Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 September 6

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation | Help desk | Archives
Help desk
< September 5 << Aug | September | Oct >> September 7 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


September 6

edit

Request on 06:27:23, 6 September 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Markusandraos

edit


I need help writing an article and making it not sound like an advertisement please.

Wiise Software Pty Ltd [Introduction] Wiise is an end-to-end, integrated, cloud-based business management platform created by KPMG Australia, built on Microsoft, and supported by the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA). Wiise is built on Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (BC) and tailored for small and medium-sized businesses in the Australian market.

[History] Wiise was created by KPMG Australia after acquiring Microsoft systems implementer, Hands-on Systems in 2015. Hands-on Systems was founded in 1985 and is one of Microsoft’s top global partners and is a complete Dynamics enterprise resource planning (AX, NAV) and CRM provider. Financials for Office 365 was spun out from Hands-On Systems in 2014 as a competitor to the likes of Xero and based on Microsoft Dynamics. The independent software vendor (ISV) was a finalist in the 2018 CRN Impact Awards and the 2014 World Wide Microsoft Dynamics Cloud Partner of the Year Awards. In July 2014, Financials for Office 365 won Microsoft’s Global Core Financials Award. After the acquisition, KPMG, CBA, and Microsoft formed a strategic partnership to co-develop Wiise, launching in the Australian market as of July 2018.

[Product] Wiise is an end-to-end business software with banking integration and built-in analytics and reporting, alongside accounting, HR, payroll, inventory and manufacturing functionality. Wiise is available on a subscription basis, as software-as-a-service. The three different packages available are Lite, Business, and Premium. All packages offer accounting, finance management and reporting, basic inventory management, receivables and payables, auto-reconciliation, HR and payroll. The more advanced packages offering more complex functionality for larger or more complicated business through advanced additional operational modules like distribution and warehousing, service management, and manufacturing.

[Awards and recognition] Wiise has been awarded Finalist for Microsoft’s 2019 Dynamics 365 Business Central Partner of the Year Award. The Microsoft Partner of the Year Awards goes to partners who demonstrate excellence in innovation and outstanding success implementing customer solutions based on Microsoft technology.

Markusandraos (talk) 06:27, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

06:58:14, 6 September 2019 review of submission by Tommylagestam

edit


Hi. I am requesting a re-review of this as it's a misinterpretation that B-Reel is the "parent company" of B-Reel Films. B-Reel Films (BRF) is an independent film and production studio. B-Reel is a creative (advertising) agency. B-Reel is in no way involved in B-Reel Film's notable work like the film Midsommar, the documentary about Greta Thunberg and the Alicia Vikander feature film Euphoria. Those are B-Reel Films (BRF) productions.

Wikipedia allows separate articles for advertising agency Saatchi & Saatchi and M&C Saatchi, even though they are intricately linked. B-Reel and B-Reel Films (BRF) are similarly separate entities. With world famous productions like those aforementioned, it is surprising why B-Reel Films (BRF) would not be considered notable.

Tommylagestam (talk) 06:58, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


07:01:19, 6 September 2019 review of submission by Sajacz

edit


May i ask you why you decide that page is advertisement? I want only inform about company here based on other services here like: monday.com trello etc. what is difference ? and why monday and trello are ok ?

Sajacz (talk) 07:01, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Sajacz: - so it was rejected on notability grounds because the only source it had came from the company itself. It also has a marketing tone, "Thanks to this overview", "saving you both time and work" etc. Normally I'd refer you to WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, which explains why you can't use one source being allowed/disallowed to justify another. However, Trello has over a dozen sources and is laid out neutrally. Nosebagbear (talk) 13:58, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Sajacz: I've tagged the page for Speedy deletion. You may want to review WP:INDEPENDENT WP:RS and WP:PUFFERY. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 05:27, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

07:27:21, 6 September 2019 review of submission by Maria Sitkina

edit

I added additional references, please check it and approve Maria Sitkina (talk) 07:27, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


07:44:39, 6 September 2019 review of submission by Purple anka

edit

Hi! My draft is declined due to being "not properly referenced by independent sources". I did add references, but they're all in the Ukrainian language. Am I only allowed to reference English-language sources when the Wiki article is in English? I was just trying to create an English copy of the existing article about a music band in Ukraine. Thanks for any tips! Purple anka (talk) 07:44, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Purple anka: - hi there. Ukrainian (or Russia etc) sources are fine - google translate does a reasonable job these days. Running through the sources, they generally aren't sufficient to prove notability for two reasons. Some aren't independent, as they are either directly from the band, or are interviews (where all the answers come from the band). Others aren't really in depth, with only a couple of lines on Karna. Nosebagbear (talk) 14:04, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

08:29:09, 6 September 2019 review of draft by Indigenus~enwiki

edit


Hello, I have been advised that the multiple references for the draft article do not meet the criteria for notability. This is quite confusing, as the following references are multiple, and apparently meet the defined criteria for significant coverage in independent, reliable and secondary sources. Please see below:

1. Coverage in BloombergQuint.com, a prominent financial news portal formed as partnership between Bloomberg and Quintillion media (reference: https://www.bloomberg.com/company/press/bloomberg-forms-new-partnership-with-quintillion-media-in-india/). Coverage link: https://www.bloombergquint.com/business/startup-street-this-startup-says-it-can-nearly-wipe-out-your-electricity-bill

2. Coverage in ETEnergyworld.com, a part of The Economic Times, India's largest English financial daily, that focuses on energy news. Coverage link: https://energy.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/renewable/we-will-achieve-rs-100-cr-annual-revenue-this-financial-year-pranesh-chaudhary-founder-zunroof/70024921

3. Coverage in The Hindu Businessline, a leading, highly-credible financial daily in India. Coverage link: https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/specials/clean-tech/lighting-up-your-home-right-from-the-roof/article27198508.ece

4. Coverage in CNBC-TV18, a leading financial news channel (an India-specific venture of CNBC), link: https://www.cnbctv18.com/young-turks/young-turks-troubled-with-high-electricity-bills-heres-how-zunroof-can-solve-your-problems-3828671.htm

5. Coverage in Moneycontrol.com, a prominent financial and business news portal owned by Network 18, a leading media company of India. Link: https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/this-startups-solar-power-solutions-is-making-indian-homes-green-and-future-ready-3971841.html

I feel that Zunroof meets the criteria for notability - however I am happy to take feedback from other editors.

Indigenus~enwiki (talk) 08:29, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have not received a response. Could someone please get back. Indigenus~enwiki (talk) 05:43, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

10:54:05, 6 September 2019 review of submission by Swansonnery

edit


I believe the topic could now be relevant to be included on Wikipedia. If you believe it still is not, I would really appreciate the reasons why, or even the criteria which needs to be met. Thanks!

Swansonnery (talk) 10:54, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

14:43:22, 6 September 2019 review of draft by 27.4.251.134

edit


Hi there, it has been more than 50 days since Draft:Foundation Holdings is not yet reviewed. I requested some time back to review it and I am requesting again to kindly review the same. Thanks in advance!


27.4.251.134 (talk) 14:43, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It was reviewed and rejected in the meantime for WP:UPE violations. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 05:13, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2019_September_6&oldid=985271006"