Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 March 16

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation | Help desk | Archives
Help desk
< March 15 << Feb | March | Apr >> March 17 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


March 16

edit

00:15:14, 16 March 2020 review of draft by MeVeOl

edit


I'm having trouble determining why my article, "Karyn Olivier" isn't being approved. Is there any advice you can give me on how to proceed? Is it due to layout? Is it due to over-sourcing? I'm trying to provide a reference for every line, but perhaps this is more than needed? This artist is undoubtedly a notable person, and I'm new to wiki so I really don't know what I'm doing wrong. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. MeVeOl (talk) 00:15, 16 March 2020 (UTC) MeVeOl (talk) 00:15, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 01:35:56, 16 March 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Christyt852

edit


May I ask which part of the articles requires more independent sources to increase credibility?


Christyt852 (talk) 01:35, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

03:46:49, 16 March 2020 review of submission by Manakshal

edit

Hi , I would like to know how this article can be saved Manakshal (talk) 03:46, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't really ands article it's entire content consists of "CEO of Arabian Industries LLC , Abu Dhabi" Wikipedia is not a business directory. Theroadislong (talk) 12:34, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

04:26:49, 16 March 2020 review of submission by 1.186.196.95

edit


Vedang Shahane is very popular youngest entrepreneur in india and u saying he isn't popular for Wikipedia? It's bad experience 1.186.196.95 (talk) 04:26, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

06:57:25, 16 March 2020 review of draft by Gaussianfilter

edit


Gaussianfilter (talk) 06:57, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Resubmitting, with the feedback, but the feedback is not specific, looking for specific recommendations to submit properly

06:58:07, 16 March 2020 review of submission by Gaussianfilter

edit


Gaussianfilter (talk) 06:58, 16 March 2020 (UTC) Looking for specific feedback to resubmit[reply]

08:01:53, 16 March 2020 review of draft by OohAahTw

edit 
Because I thought a tv show which is not aired yet is still approving by the admins, Like Ang Lihim ni Ligaya that is not yet airing. But it's already approved. I created a page "Everybody Sing!" which is upcoming show, why it is declined and rejected? I've already read the guidelines. But it's rejected again? please I need assistance.

OohAahTw (talk) 08:01, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

08:25:48, 16 March 2020 review of submission by Katikov

edit

Could you please let me know specifically how I can improve the draft to be approved. Katikov (talk) 08:25, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

12:13:28, 16 March 2020 review of submission by Kjell1918

edit

Hi! Would it be possible for you to guide me on how to moderate this article to correct standards? At the moment I don't understand why it didn't "pass". I put a lot of work into finding theses sources and writing this article and would be devastated if it was all in vain.

Kjell1918 (talk) 12:13, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kjell1918. Writing about private companies that are still in business is risky these days. Wikipedia has very little appetite for articles about such companies. It would be safer to write about public companies, defunct companies, something other than companies and their leaders, or to write for an alternative outlet with different inclusion criteria.
The problems with the tone of Draft:Eleiko may stem from its sources. Website feelsoma.wordpress.com (which redirects to u-n-motion.com) is a self-published blog, not a reliable source. Many of the other sources appear to be trade publications, which often have a too-cozy relationship with the companies in the industry they cover. Hallands Nyheter would generally be a reliable source, but that article is an obituary of the owner of the company, written by the former owner, so it too lacks independence. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:22, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

12:18:11, 16 March 2020 review of submission by 1.186.199.81

edit

vedang is very popular and got his page denied because of notability?really? i have almost 20m+ followers 1.186.199.81 (talk) 12:18, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The number of followers you have is irrelevant, you have zero independent reliable sources. As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia only summarizes information that appears in independent reliable sources Theroadislong (talk) 12:33, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

14:33:11, 16 March 2020 review of draft by Rolf robert fischer

edit


I need explanations why this is seen as advertisement, while I tried to write facts in a neutral form. There are plenty of verifiable and reliable sources of different authors. If you try to read articles of comparable softwares like Abaqus, Nastran, Ansys, I am convinced you may find more advertisements. So please help me. And I like to mention, that the article in this form is on de.wikipedia

Rolf robert fischer (talk) 14:33, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have not read the entire submission, but the words "particularly suitable" jumped out at me. This means "here is a solution to your problems" and is therefore language favorably disposed towards the topic, rather than being a dispassionate explanation. Please review your submission for other, similar lines of thought. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 19:30, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please also declare your clear conflict of interest. Theroadislong (talk) 19:31, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

19:22:19, 16 March 2020 review of submission by 2409:4040:410:191E:E11C:50AF:AC8D:F3D

edit


2409:4040:410:191E:E11C:50AF:AC8D:F3D (talk) 19:22, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


I agree with previous reviewers that the topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 19:30, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

21:03:29, 16 March 2020 review of submission by 86.135.144.186

edit

She is a popular person in my area and there are many people looking for information about her, hence why I made this wikipedia page 86.135.144.186 (talk) 21:03, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


22:02:05, 16 March 2020 review of submission by SethBrewster

edit

Why was it rejected? I talked to him, and all of it is true. No making sense. Disappointed. Why!!!??? SethBrewster (talk) 22:02, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@SethBrewster: First of all, WP:TRUTH. Secondly, WP:NPERSON applies here, presumably the section on entertainers. Since this is a WP:BLP sources are absolutely required. What is definitely required is significant coverage in independent relieable sources. Wikipedia doesn't consider itself a reliebale source. From what I see its WP:TOSOON for now. Victor Schmidt (talk) 07:34, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Need your help!

edit

23:41:38, 16 March 2020 review of draft by Timofeytv

edit


Hi there! Tibetan elections are coming up next month and i would like to ask you for your help in regards of publishing this article.

I searched and included only reputable and verifiable sources. There is NY Times, The Hill, NPR, and Forbes among others. All of the sources have been used in other articles on wiki.

Lobsang Nyandak is also included in other wiki articles:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tibetan_Centre_for_Human_Rights_and_Democracy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1996_Tibetan_Parliament_in_Exile_election https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Tibetan_Administration

The article is written in formal tone and I'm lost about what else could be done?

Thank you in advance!

Tim.

Article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Lobsang_Nyandak


Timofeytv (talk) 23:41, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2020_March_16&oldid=985275723"