Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 March 23

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation | Help desk | Archives
Help desk
< March 22 << Feb | March | Apr >> March 24 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


March 23

edit

02:19:50, 23 March 2020 review of submission by RealCapitalC99

edit

I am requesting a re-review on this page because this page has been needing to be create for a long time and I need to know specifically what edits I need to make in order to get it reapproved and some guidance through it cuz this is my very first Wikipedia page being created solely by me so if you guys can do that, make sure to message me please. RealCapitalC99 (talk) 02:19, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RealCapitalC99 Your draft has been rejected, meaning that there is almost no chance it can be improved enough to be accepted, no matter how well you write it. You have not demonstrated with significant coverage in independent reliable sources how this musician meets Wikipedia's special definition of a notable musician. 331dot (talk) 08:33, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

08:12:32, 23 March 2020 review of submission by Anyajerald

edit


Anyajerald (talk) 08:12, 23 March 2020 (UTC) I am requesting a re-review on this page, I have been trying to get approval for a long time with lots of efforts as this is y first time in posting in Wikipedia. I have added some new ref links.Pls re-review it and provide me guidance in getting this published in Wikipedia.Thank you in advance.[reply]

Anyajerald Your draft has been rejected, meaning there is almost no chance of improving it enough to be accepted, no matter how well you write it. Any Wikipedia article must only summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage say about a subject, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of notability. The sources you offer are all brief mentions with no significant coverage and only cite specific information. I'm sorry, but the app does not seem to merit an article at this time. If you are associated with this app, such as working for its maker, you must read and comply with conflict of interest and paid editing. 331dot (talk) 08:29, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

10:08:39, 23 March 2020 review of submission by 24.47.53.207

edit


I am re-reviewing this again because idk what I did wrong and I need a Wikipedia for my brand so can h bare with me here and help me out. 24.47.53.207 (talk) 10:08, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid you are not notable in Wikipedia's terms, see WP:NMUSICIAN for the specific requirements. Theroadislong (talk) 10:17, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

14:57:39, 23 March 2020 review of draft by 172.78.61.42

edit


172.78.61.42 (talk) 14:57, 23 March 2020 (UTC) Im trying to make a championship Wrestling from Arizona page & it's lock[reply]

Hello. your article is currently citing two articles right now that could possibly establish notability (although this is a definite edge case) under Wikipedia's notability criteria. But given the length of this article, more citations are required to support it. Essentially, all your citations are verifying is that the subject of the article existed (because they are passing references in the article). You need to provide citations that at least broadly cover all the other claims made in the article. Sam-2727 (talk) 15:48, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

19:43:18, 23 March 2020 review of submission by HowellSarahLouise

edit

Hello! I recently submitted an article on the topic of the Power Play Initiative by ExxonMobil. The feedback I received said my tone wasn't formal or neutral enough, but I'm having a hard time discerning exactly which sections this was in reference to. Additionally, I was told my references aren't sufficient enough to classify as significant coverage, even though every article is solely about Power Play. I am grateful for the feedback and would really like to get this page up, so any help identifying where the issues are in the current copy would be much appreciated.

HowellSarahLouise (talk) 19:43, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HowellSarahLouise For what reason do you really want to get the page up? The draft article(not just a "page") is sourced to nothing but press releases, which does not establish that this initiative meets Wikipedia's special definition of notability. Wikipedia articles should only summarize what purely independent reliable sources state about a subject. Press releases are put out by the subject itself(even if republished). 331dot (talk) 19:57, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

331dot (talk) 331dot Thank you for the response. At the 'Women’s Forum for the Economy and Society’ which I attended in Paris last November, Wikipedia representatives were present actively encouraging the creation of pages dedicated to promoting/empowering women. Of the more than 800,000 biographies on the English Wikipedia, roughly 15% of those are about women.

While this article isn't about a specific person, it can serve as a source of information on an increasingly important subject, something that’s being done about it and the notable women it that this program has actively been able to highlight (such as Jocelyne Machevo). This growing initiative, established in the General Interest, is actively supporting inclusion and diversity across the Energy industry – another area where women are woefully under represented. As for the references, while it’s true that some sources have pulled information from press releases, others have contributed their own independent research and interviews. Is there a specific number of notable, reliable sources I should be aiming for? Thanks! HowellSarahLouise (talk) 16:41, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

21:00:02, 23 March 2020 review of submission by Ecorrea5621

edit


Ecorrea5621 (talk) 21:00, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


My name is Eugene Correa I'm publishing a Biography/article here about myself it has been declined for whatever reason I would like to know? why when I am a current professional athlete world recognized if there's anything needed to get it approved I would like to hear back please thank you.

Ecorrea5621 Please read the autobiography policy to learn why attempting to write about yourself on Wikipedia is not advisable. Your draft was declined because it does not summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage say about you, indicating how you meet Wikipedia's special definition of a notable MMA fighter, please read it at WP:NMMA. 331dot (talk) 21:23, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2020_March_23&oldid=985275770"