Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 March 9

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation | Help desk | Archives
Help desk
< March 8 << Feb | March | Apr >> March 10 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


March 9

edit

01:41:01, 9 March 2020 review of submission by Tezzadiver

edit


I have adjusted the blurb in the box. I wasn't trying to push an agenda just stating we need to support marine conservation...

Tezzadiver (talk) 01:41, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tezzadiver Your submission was a personal statement and not an encyclopedia article. You should use social media for such statements, not Wikipedia. This is an encyclopedia where articles summarize what independent reliable sources state about notable subjects, not what we ourselves want to say about them. 331dot (talk) 07:35, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

01:52:18, 9 March 2020 review of submission by Salvadi Actor

edit

Please let me know where to mention that it is not an autobiography Salvadi Actor (talk) 01:52, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


03:30:26, 9 March 2020 review of submission by Spiritletters

edit


Wikipedia citations were simply removed from this draft. Is their a volunteer of Please advise of any additional issues at this point?

Spiritletters (talk) 03:30, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Spiritletters: - you've still got 2 wikipedia references, and Discogs is a non-reliable, non-independent source. The band's own site can be referenced for some things, but so that you're aware, it won't help prove that they're notable (as it obviously can't be independent). Your first source is dead-linking, and it looks like it would be quite key, so that would be worth checking. Nosebagbear (talk) 10:53, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

04:42:07, 9 March 2020 review of draft by 125.238.128.21

edit


A page I wrote was denied for the reason "There does not seem to be any individual notability apart from the charity". That's like saying Bill Gates has articles always talking about Microsoft, or Ronaldo is always talked about in the context of football. I feel as though the article was declined for a questionable reason but am open to any further reasons :) 125.238.128.21 (talk) 04:42, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@125.238.128.21: - it's not saying sources that discuss them in their main context don't suffice, but they need to have significant coverage (c. 10+ lines) about them. These sources usually have 3-4 non-quoted lines about Mussie, and then talk purely about the charity. Whereas in the Gates/Ronaldo, there are dedicated articles, plus lots more heavily about both their organisation and the individual. Nosebagbear (talk) 10:57, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

11:48:21, 9 March 2020 review of draft by Alwayslp

edit


Hello, thank you for your help. This draft had been rejected due to lack of encyclopedic tone - I re-wrote it with what I thought to be more of an encyclopedic style, but it has been again rejected at this time. I'm grateful for any help you can give me. The draft is written in chronological order, not pyramid style..I'm wondering if that could be an issue too? Thank you so much for your help on this draft overall. Alwayslp (talk) 11:48, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alwayslp, The entire article is just one long brag about the subject. My guess is that you either are Paulie Gee, work for Paulie Gee or otherwise have a close connection to the subject that is making your tone in writing inherently biased. Sulfurboy (talk) 17:40, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alwayslp (talk) 11:48, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

13:13:04, 9 March 2020 review of submission by Brenchristo

edit

My Article has been rejected and I need your assistance in rewriting it. PLEASE HELP. Brenchristo (talk) 13:13, 9 March 2020 (UTC)Brenda Mohammed[reply]

We're happy to help with questions you may have, but we're not here to write your article for you. See WP:BUILDERSulfurboy (talk) 17:39, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

14:17:21, 9 March 2020 review of submission by ThomasForti40

edit


ThomasForti40 (talk) 14:17, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ThomasForti40, Did you have a question? Sulfurboy (talk) 17:39, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


14:50:00, 9 March 2020 review of submission by Incusgmbh

edit

Hi everyone! My article has been rejected: "This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies)." I'm new here and I'd very thankful if you could help me with what sources should I add! Please help me to rewrite my draft - many thanks in advance! :) Incusgmbh (talk) 13:13, 9 March 2020 (UTC)Incusgmbh[reply]

  On hold pending paid editing disclosure, see User talk:Incusgmbh#Declare any connection. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:03, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 16:29:02, 9 March 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by 68.103.78.155

edit


They are 2 References And That The Previous season has finished the Regular season but why do we have to wait 4 Weeks. 68.103.78.155 (talk) 16:29, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

68.103.78.155 (talk) 16:29, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The vast majority of the claims made in the article are unsourced. The couple of references you do provide do not show an overwhelming need yet for this article, thus it is WP:TOOSOON unless you can show significant coverage of the subject now exists. Sulfurboy (talk) 17:38, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

17:25:37, 9 March 2020 review of submission by WPisarnik

edit


why are you not telling me what is wrong - seit nur so gemein, kein problem - I am only trying to help the professional driver to have some fun and make new friends at the Professional Driver World Championship 2020 in Croatian. if you want this article to be fetures in then help me -


LG Walter

WPisarnik (talk) 17:25, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WPisarnik, The article has been outright rejected and will not be considered further. We recommend a different outlet for advertising this race. Sulfurboy (talk) 17:37, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

21:17:23, 9 March 2020 review of submission by Timofebakare83

edit

Thanks everyone for your help so far. I need to be able to get the help to make this article comply in neutrality and notability, can you provide additional guidance to me. I do not want this article to be an advertisement. The subject is indeed notable, and I do not want my writing style to connote otherwise. I will take your advise, edit and resubmit.Thanks Timofebakare83 (talk) 21:17, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

22:09:51, 9 March 2020 review of submission by 4kingly

edit 
I edited it can you check again

4kingly (talk) 22:09, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2020_March_9&oldid=985275908"