Wikipedia:WikiProject Backpacking/Assessment


Recognized content

edit
edit
edit
edit

Good articles

edit

Did you know? articles

edit
edit

Former good articles

edit

Level 4 vital articles

edit

Level 5 vital articles

edit


Source page: Wikipedia:WikiProject Backpacking/Recognized content

Top articles by recent edit count

edit
14 edits Northern Crossing (Tararua Range)
5 edits Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park
3 edits Wild (2014 film)
2 edits Bureau of Land Management
2 edits Leeds Country Way
2 edits Alfred Wainwright
2 edits List of mountaineering equipment brands
2 edits Peace Pilgrim
2 edits Sierra Club
2 edits Recreational Equipment, Inc.

These are the articles that have been edited the most within the last seven days. Last updated 17 August 2021 by HotArticlesBot.

Source page: Wikipedia:WikiProject Backpacking/Hot articles

edit

This is a list of bot-generated pages in the scope of Wikipedia:WikiProject Backpacking along with pageviews.

To report bugs, please write on the Community tech bot talk page on Meta.

List

edit

Period: 2024-10-01 to 2024-10-31

Total views: 1,369,861

Updated: 16:01, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Rank Page title Views Daily average Assessment Importance
1 Camino de Santiago 127,079 4,099 Unknown Unknown
2 Bear Grylls 77,952 2,514 Unknown Unknown
3 Chris McCandless 76,955 2,482 Unknown Unknown
4 Appalachian Trail 40,869 1,318 Unknown Unknown
5 The North Face 29,261 943 Unknown Unknown
6 The Way (2010 film) 27,461 885 Unknown Unknown
7 Patagonia, Inc. 26,030 839 Unknown Unknown
8 Wild (2014 film) 25,002 806 Unknown Unknown
9 Arc'teryx 23,619 761 Unknown Unknown
10 First aid 23,517 758 Unknown Unknown
11 Bill Bryson 20,656 666 Unknown Unknown
12 Pacific Crest Trail 20,633 665 Unknown Unknown
13 Mountaineering 19,789 638 Unknown Unknown
14 National Park Service 19,284 622 Unknown Unknown
15 Desire path 18,995 612 Unknown Unknown
16 Hiking 16,966 547 Unknown Unknown
17 Columbia Sportswear 16,420 529 Unknown Unknown
18 Grand Canyon National Park 16,317 526 Unknown Unknown
19 Bivouac shelter 15,730 507 Unknown Unknown
20 Topographic map 15,468 498 Unknown Unknown
21 Great Smoky Mountains National Park 14,940 481 Unknown Unknown
22 Mount Katahdin 12,704 409 Unknown Unknown
23 Tarpaulin 11,255 363 Unknown Unknown
24 United States Forest Service 11,066 356 Unknown Unknown
25 Bothy 10,155 327 Unknown Unknown
26 Via Francigena 10,037 323 Unknown Unknown
27 Backpack 9,460 305 Unknown Unknown
28 Sierra Club 9,302 300 Unknown Unknown
29 Pocketknife 9,154 295 Unknown Unknown
30 REI 9,039 291 Unknown Unknown
31 Continental Divide Trail 8,926 287 Unknown Unknown
32 Bureau of Land Management 8,919 287 Unknown Unknown
33 Camping 8,345 269 Unknown Unknown
34 Tour du Mont Blanc 8,317 268 Unknown Unknown
35 Canada Goose (clothing) 7,946 256 Unknown Unknown
36 Ice axe 7,491 241 Unknown Unknown
37 Outdoor recreation 7,282 234 Unknown Unknown
38 Fjällräven 7,245 233 Unknown Unknown
39 John Muir Trail 7,079 228 Unknown Unknown
40 Freedom to roam 6,722 216 Unknown Unknown
41 Guide book 6,691 215 Unknown Unknown
42 Nordic walking 6,455 208 Unknown Unknown
43 Wild (memoir) 6,326 204 Unknown Unknown
44 Lycian Way 6,162 198 Unknown Unknown
45 Lean-to 6,014 194 Unknown Unknown
46 Wilderness 5,884 189 Unknown Unknown
47 The Nature Conservancy 5,764 185 Unknown Unknown
48 Gaiters 5,719 184 Unknown Unknown
49 A Walk in the Woods (film) 5,684 183 Unknown Unknown
50 Insect repellent 5,440 175 Unknown Unknown
51 Grandma Gatewood 5,363 173 Unknown Unknown
52 Lillian Alling 5,212 168 Start Unknown
53 Hammock 5,113 164 Unknown Unknown
54 Tent 5,034 162 Unknown Unknown
55 Fire making 4,752 153 Unknown Unknown
56 Climbing 4,750 153 Unknown Unknown
57 Scrambling 4,717 152 Unknown Unknown
58 Quechua (brand) 4,694 151 Unknown Unknown
59 Gander Mountain 4,611 148 Unknown Unknown
60 Green Mountains 4,601 148 Unknown Unknown
61 Coleman (brand) 4,588 148 Unknown Unknown
62 JanSport 4,575 147 Unknown Unknown
63 Death of Vance Rodriguez 4,555 146 Unknown Unknown
64 Survival skills 4,532 146 Unknown Unknown
65 Thru-hiking 4,343 140 Unknown Unknown
66 Kokoda Track 4,316 139 Unknown Unknown
67 List of long-distance trails in the United States 4,206 135 Unknown Unknown
68 Dyneema Composite Fabric 4,182 134 Unknown Unknown
69 Triple Crown of Hiking 4,145 133 Unknown Unknown
70 Trail 4,066 131 Unknown Unknown
71 Jack Wolfskin 4,066 131 Unknown Unknown
72 Backpacking (hiking) 3,986 128 Unknown Unknown
73 The Ridgeway 3,878 125 Unknown Unknown
74 Hadrian's Wall Path 3,624 116 Unknown Unknown
75 West Highland Way 3,591 115 Unknown Unknown
76 Swedish torch 3,586 115 Unknown Unknown
77 Canoeing 3,570 115 Unknown Unknown
78 Appalachian Trail by state 3,544 114 Unknown Unknown
79 Snowshoe 3,463 111 Unknown Unknown
80 Coast to Coast Walk 3,411 110 Unknown Unknown
81 Pennine Way 3,406 109 Unknown Unknown
82 National Trails System 3,379 109 Unknown Unknown
83 Karrimor 3,337 107 Unknown Unknown
84 Rail trail 3,306 106 Unknown Unknown
85 European long-distance paths 3,286 106 Unknown Unknown
86 A Walk in the Woods (book) 3,276 105 Unknown Unknown
87 Alfred Wainwright 3,246 104 Unknown Unknown
88 Peace Pilgrim 3,233 104 Unknown Unknown
89 Rab (company) 3,213 103 Unknown Unknown
90 Hexamine fuel tablet 3,094 99 Unknown Unknown
91 South West Coast Path 3,046 98 Unknown Unknown
92 Marmot (company) 3,041 98 Unknown Unknown
93 Regatta (clothing) 2,985 96 Unknown Unknown
94 Outside 2,954 95 Unknown Unknown
95 Cotswold Way 2,932 94 Unknown Unknown
96 Portable stove 2,865 92 Unknown Unknown
97 Mountain Equipment Co-op 2,797 90 Unknown Unknown
98 List of wilderness areas of the United States 2,738 88 Unknown Unknown
99 Campsite 2,675 86 Unknown Unknown
100 International Appalachian Trail 2,668 86 Unknown Unknown

Source page: Wikipedia:WikiProject Backpacking/Popular pages

Article alerts

edit

Articles to be merged

Source page: Wikipedia:WikiProject Backpacking/Article alerts

Other

edit

Note: the transcluded pages above are produced on our behalf by bots

Article assessment

edit

The project is using standard and extended class/importance as described in content assessment. See also assessing articles.

Priority/importance

edit
Top
Subject is extremely important, even crucial, to its specific field. Reserved for subjects that have achieved international notability within their field
High
Subject is extremely notable, but has not achieved international notability, or is only notable within a particular continent
Mid
Subject is only notable within its particular field or subject and has achieved notability in a particular place or area
Low
Subject is not particularly notable or significant even within its field of study. It may only be included to cover a specific part of a notable article

When reviewing the importance of an article to the project, consider this guidance. Your judgment as an editor will always trump this guidance.

  • The U.S. National Scenic Trails, or another nations equivalent, and many subjects related to hiking upon them should probably be High priority.
  • The Ten essentials and individual articles about the use of the essential or skills need to use it effectively should be High priority.
  • Other equipment critical to a safe and comfortable backpacking trip should be Mid priority unless it is more—or less—notable for another reason.
  • Organizations that support long-distance hikers or the trails they use should be Mid priority.
  • Hiking trails shorter that ten miles (16 km) may not belong to this project at all unless they are of notable interest to backpackers.
  • Hiking trails longer than ten miles (16 km) should be Low priority unless they are of significant interest to backpackers.
  • Manufacturers or brands of equipment used by backpackers should be Low priority unless they are essential to backpackers for an important reason.

Content quality grading

edit

Standard classes

edit

We use these classes as defined further in Wikipedia:Content assessment. Here is the relative Part of that document.

Stub-Class
A very basic description of the topic. Can be well-written, but may also have significant content issues.

The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to become a meaningful article. It is usually very short; but, if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible, an article of any length falls into this category. Although Stub-class articles are the lowest class of the normal classes, they are adequate enough to be an accepted article, though they do have risks of being dropped from being an article altogether.

Start-Class
An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources.

The article has a usable amount of good content but is weak in many areas. Quality of the prose may be distinctly unencyclopedic, and Wikipedia:Manual of Style compliance non-existent. The article should satisfy fundamental content policies, such as Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Frequently, the referencing is inadequate, although enough sources are usually provided to establish verifiability. No Start-Class article should be in any danger of being speedily deleted.

C-Class
The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains much irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup.

The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements; need editing for clarity, balance, or flow; or contain policy violations, such as bias or original research. Articles on fictional topics are likely to be marked as C-Class if they are written from an in-universe perspective. It is most likely that C-Class articles have a reasonable encyclopedic style.

B-Class
The article is mostly complete and without major problems but requires some further work to reach good article standards.

The article meets the six B-Class criteria:

  1. The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional.
  2. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.
  3. The article has a defined structure.Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
  4. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it does not need to be "brilliant". The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously.
  5. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate.Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infoboxetc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
  6. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. Although Wikipedia is more than just a general encyclopedia, the article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.
GA-Class
The article has attained good article status, having been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations.

The article meets the good article criteria:

A good article is:

  1. Well written:
    1. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
    2. it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
  2. Verifiable with no original research:
    1. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
    2. all inline citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines;
    3. it contains no original research; and
    4. it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism.
  3. Broad in its coverage:
    1. it addresses the main aspectsof the topic; and
    2. it stays focused on the topicwithout going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
  6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
    1. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
    2. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
FA-Class
The article has attained featured articlestatus by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates.

The article meets the featured article criteria:

A featured article exemplifies our very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.

  1. It is:
    1. well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard;
    2. comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context;
    3. well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiableagainst high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate;
    4. neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias; and
    5. stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process.
  2. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of:
    1. a lead: a concise lead sectionthat summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections;
    2. appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and
    3. consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using either footnotes (<ref>Smith 2007, p. 1</ref>) or Harvard referencing (Smith 2007, p. 1)—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required.
  3. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly.
  4. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style.

Other classes

edit

These are used for project maintenance.

List-Class
Any list page falls under this class
Disambig-Class
Any disambiguation page falls under this class
Category-Class
Any category falls under this class
Draft-Class
Any draft falls under this class. These are typically found in the Draft namespace, but may also be in the User namespace
Project-Class
Any project page falls under this class; may also include help pages
Template-Class
Any template falls under this class; may also include modules or userboxes

Statistics

edit