WikiProject
Contemporary Christian Music
General Information
Main Project Page talk
 → Articles Needing Attention talk
 → Requests talk
 → New Articles talk
 → Assessment talk
 → Collaboration talk
 → Outreach talk
 → Peer Review talk
Project Organization
Members talk
Project Navigation talk
Project Banner talk
Project Userbox talk
Project Categories talk
Guidelines
Policies and Guidelines
Editing Wikipedia
 → Naming Conventions
 → Article Structure
 → Infobox Templates
edit · changes



Welcome to the assessment department of the Contemporary Christian music WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Contemporary Christian music related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Contemporary Christian music}} banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Contemporary Christian music articles by quality and Category:Contemporary Christian music articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Current status

edit


Frequently asked questions

edit
How can I get my article rated?
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles?
Any member of the Contemporary Christian music WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article.
Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
What if I don't agree with a rating?
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective?
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions

edit

Quality assessments

edit

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Banner Shell}}. Articles that have the {{WikiProject Contemporary Christian music}} project banner on their talk page will be added to the appropriate categories by quality.

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Contemporary Christian music articles)   FA
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Contemporary Christian music articles)   GA
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Contemporary Christian music articles) B
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Contemporary Christian music articles) C
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Contemporary Christian music articles) Start
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Contemporary Christian music articles) Stub

For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:

??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Contemporary Christian music articles) ???

After assessing an article's quality, any comments on the assessment can be added to the article's talk page.

Quality scale

edit

Importance assessment

edit

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Contemporary Christian music}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Contemporary Christian music| ... | importance=??? | ...}}
Top
High
Mid
Low
???

The following values may be used for importance assessments:

Importance scale

edit
Label Criteria Reader's experience Editor's experience Example
Top The article is one of the core topics about Contemporary Christian music. A reader who is not involved in the field of Contemporary Christian music will have high familiarity with the subject matter and should be able to relate to the topic easily. Articles in this importance range are written in mostly generic terms, leaving technical terms and descriptions for more specialized pages. Contemporary Christian music
High The article covers a topic that is vital to understanding Contemporary Christian music.
Mid The article covers a topic that has a strong but not vital role in the history of Contemporary Christian music. Many readers will be familiar with the topic being discussed, but a larger majority of readers may have only cursory knowledge of the overall subject. Articles at this level will cover subjects that are well known but not necessarily vital to understand Contemporary Christian music. Due to the topics covered at this level, Mid-importance articles will generally have more technical terms used in the article text. Most people involved in Contemporary Christian music will be rated in this level.
Low The article is not required knowledge for a broad understanding of Contemporary Christian music. Few readers outside the Contemporary Christian music field or its fans may be familiar with the subject matter. It is likely that the reader does not know anything at all about the subject before reading the article. Articles at this range of importance will often delve into the minutiae of Contemporary Christian music, using technical terms (and defining them) as needed. Topics included at this level include most practices and infrastructure of Contemporary Christian music.

Given the number and variety of articles with which this project shall be dealing, I believe that we should devote a good deal of attention in the short run to determining which of the articles we consider to be of greatest importance to the project. We now have a page at Wikipedia:WikiProject Contemporary Christian music/Assessment/Top-importance articles where we can discuss which articles should receive top-importance ranking. Any and all input is more than welcome.

Requesting an assessment

edit

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

Referenced, now is between Start and B class, probably needs more refs before it is truely B. Dan, the CowMan 03:36, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • I would like to request a reassesment for Across The Sky there has been some work done on this article. It needs some improvement. Part of the rush is that it is up for deletion. Any help would be appreciated.74.138.202.34 10:28, 31 March 2007 (UTC) I've also added some content and ref. to page. It does need clean up and wikification (is that a word?) but it was enough content to prevent deletion of article. M-BMor 02:20, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Definately comming along low B here needs picture. 74.138.202.34 19:11, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Can someone assess the two album pages I created (All Because of You (Lisa Whelchel album) and Fire and Ice (Steve Camp album))? WAVY 10 13:25, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment log

edit
Contemporary Christian music articles:
Index · Statistics · Log
The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

February 25, 2013

edit

Removed

edit

February 17, 2013

edit

Assessed

edit

February 1, 2012

edit

Assessed

edit

May 13, 2011

edit

Removed

edit

January 18, 2010

edit
(No changes today)

January 10, 2010

edit
(No changes today)

January 4, 2010

edit
(No changes today)

December 28, 2009

edit
(No changes today)

December 20, 2009

edit
(No changes today)

December 14, 2009

edit
(No changes today)

December 8, 2009

edit
(No changes today)

December 3, 2009

edit
(No changes today)

November 28, 2009

edit
(No changes today)

November 23, 2009

edit
(No changes today)

November 18, 2009

edit
(No changes today)

November 12, 2009

edit
(No changes today)

November 8, 2009

edit
(No changes today)

November 5, 2009

edit
(No changes today)

October 28, 2009

edit
(No changes today)

October 24, 2009

edit
(No changes today)

October 19, 2009

edit
(No changes today)

October 14, 2009

edit
(No changes today)

October 9, 2009

edit
(No changes today)

September 30, 2009

edit
(No changes today)

September 25, 2009

edit
(No changes today)

September 21, 2009

edit
(No changes today)

September 18, 2009

edit
(No changes today)

September 14, 2009

edit
(No changes today)

September 9, 2009

edit
(No changes today)

September 5, 2009

edit
(No changes today)

August 29, 2009

edit
(No changes today)

August 24, 2009

edit
(No changes today)

August 20, 2009

edit
(No changes today)

August 14, 2009

edit
(No changes today)

August 10, 2009

edit
(No changes today)

August 7, 2009

edit
(No changes today)