Please help with our current collaboration on this subject: Dacian language
Since there are many possibilities and theories around Dacians and their language, we are proposing to all involved to use their creativity, knowledge and energy in creating separate articles for different language affinities.
It is suggested to avoid changing the main Dacian language article, the origins of Dacian tribes, the maps of Dacia and the Wikipedia language tree without prompting conversations on corresponding talk pages and thoroughly verifying sources. Please pay attention to not introduce original research and to keep a neutral point of view, per Wikipedia policies and guidelines.
As an alternative, it is suggested that you expand or create these articles, using as much academic evidence you can gather:
- Daco-Romanian, with related articles
- Daco-Moesian
- Moesi, Moesia
- Dacia Aureliana
- See Sorin Olteanu's Thraco-Daco-Moesian Languages Project (TDML)
- Daco-Thracian
- Thracian language
- Thraco-Roman
- Aromanians
- Megleno-Romanians
- See Sorin Olteanu's Thraco-Daco-Moesian Languages Project (TDML)
- Daco-Illyrian
- Dacian-Albanian connection - the theory about Albanians as Dacian migrations
- Dacian-Sarmatian connection
- Dacian-Schythian connection
- Dacian-Greek connection
- See Sorin Olteanu's Thraco-Daco-Moesian Languages Project (TDML)
- Dacian-Baltic connection - the theory about Dacians migrating to the Baltic
- Dacian-Slavic connection
- Dacian-Bactrian connection
- Dacian-Latin connection - the controversial theory about Latin descending from Dacian
- some of the above articles apply as well
- Napoleon Săvescu - very controversial, now merged into Protochronism
- Dacian script - controversial theories
- Limes Dacicus - the Roman defensive system from Dacia
Once these separate articles went through scrutiny and review, please propose the addition of links or sections about the various theories into the main articles, and/or prompt collaborative discussion for changes to important maps.
Thanks for your support!