Wikipedia:WikiProject Demographics of Australia/Booian Australian importance

Rating of Importance of articles on remaining articles on Booian Australians to the project

Need: A measure of a subject's importance, regardless of its quality

Top {{top-importance}}	Subject is a must-have for a print encyclopedia.	place of birth > 100,000
High {{high-importance}}	Subject is exceptionally important.	> 100,000 respondents for ancestry
Mid {{mid-importance}}	Subject contributes a depth of knowledge.	ancestry declared for <100,000 but more than 20,000 respondents
Low {{low-importance}}	Subject fills in important details.	remaining articles on Booian Australians
NA {{NA-importance}}	Subject importance is not applicable.

This is a first and minimum attempt to determine importance for articles on remaining articles on Booian Australians. The rating might increase if the topic is particularly newsworthy or notable in some other way.

Top: place of birth > 100,000

Australia, England, New Zealand, China (excluding SARs (Hong Kong and Macau) and Taiwan Province), Italy, Viet Nam, India, Scotland, Philippines, Greece, Germany, South Africa

• no article on New Zealander Australian

High: responses of > 100,000 as declared ancestry (ranked order)

Australian, English, Irish, Scottish, Italian, German, Chinese, Greek, Dutch, Indian, Lebanese, Vietnamese, Polish, New Zealander, Filipino, Maltese, Croatian, Australian Aboriginal, Welsh

Medium: ancestry declared for <100,000 but more than 20,000 respondents

French, Serbian, Maori, Spanish, Macedonian, South African, Sinhalese, Hungarian, Russian, Korean, Turkish, American, Danish, Austrian, Portuguese, Japanese, Samoan, Ukrainian, Indonesian, Egyptian, Swedish, Thai, Canadian, Swiss, Khmer, Chilean, Malay, Assyrian/Chaldean, Iranian, Mauritian, Czech, Finnish, Norwegian, Latvian

• No article yet on French Australian nor Hungarian Australian nor Austrian Australian nor Portuguese Australian nor Canadian Australian nor Cambodian Australian (could also have been Khmer Australian ) nor Mauritian Australian nor Czech Australian nor Finnish Australian nor Norwegian Australian (nor a covering article on Scandinavian Australian although there is a category, also missing Latvian Australian

Low importance - but worth registering anyway

• Difficult ancestries - complex ancestries sometimes might have enclaves of people with invisible status in census stats - the generation of anglo indians ex india in the mid 50's are now dying off here in australia - but their specific categorisation might not catch them in sats - similarly dutch/indonesian ancestry people in australa - although very small might not get caught either.

• Administrative patchwork items that build a larger picture - smaller impact than the early 1900 acts - but when joined together exhibit attitudes and policies that affect entry and status of parts of the population - low importance but nevertheless component parts.