Wikipedia:WikiProject Highways/Assessment/A-Class Review/Interstate 94 in Michigan
Interstate 94 in Michigan
editThis uninvolved editor deems the conditions for promotion as met, and hereby promotes this article to A-Class. -happy5214 02:05, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Toolbox |
---|
Interstate 94 in Michigan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) review
- Suggestion: Promote to A-Class
- Nominator's comments: This is the last of Michigan's primary Interstates to be promoted up from GA and part of a drive to promote the Interstate Highways in Michigan topic from GT to FT status.
- Nominated by: Imzadi 1979 → 20:33, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- First comment occurred: 22:55, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Review by Fredddie
Comments by Fredddie |
---|
It's been a while since I've reviewed something so here goes. –Fredddie™ 22:55, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The rest of the sections look fine to me. –Fredddie™ 01:26, 20 July 2016 (UTC) Replies:
More to come... Imzadi 1979 → 02:20, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
@Fredddie: that should be the first pass on all of your comments. Imzadi 1979 → 07:53, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
|
- Support. Nothing that we may have disagreed upon is enough to hold up this review. I will note for posterity, though, that for concurrencies, I always say "the two highways go..." or "US X and US Y pass through...". Thus it's appropriate then to consider them a plural. –Fredddie™ 17:18, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Review by Dough4872
editReview by Dough4872
|
---|
I will review this article. Dough4872 01:42, 22 July 2016 (UTC) Here is my review:
|
- Support - I will support the article for A-class. I still would prefer for the lane count changes to be added in the route description, though I will let it slide with the summary mention in the mini-lead. Dough4872 00:09, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Inactivity
edit- Note: The review has been suspended for being inactive for 30 days and having outstanding comments. It may be reactivated at any time in the next 6 months. --Rschen7754 07:16, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- Reply—and I'm reactivating it now. Imzadi 1979 → 07:53, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Fredddie, Dough4872, and Rschen7754: since this isn't garnering a lot of attention, any thoughts on whether or not this review can be closed and jump right to FAC? Maybe someone can at least do an image review and quick source review to have that done before FAC? Imzadi 1979 → 13:46, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- I believe that a spotcheck is technically required as well - it is required once a year for every editor, and it has been a year since we have done one (for any editor) at ACR. Note that it could be done for I-675 first, it doesn't have to be for this particular ACR. Or, we could drop the requirement altogether. --Rschen7754 03:28, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Image review by Dough4872
edit- File:I-94.svg - PD-MUTCD
- File:I-94 MI map.svg - CC-BY-3.0, GFDL, has GIS data
- File:Non Interchange Signage with Mileage Signage.jpg - PD-self
- File:Interstate 94 & U.S. 23 interchange.JPG - CC-BY-3.0
- File:Interstate 94 Landing at Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County International Airport, Romulus, Michigan (14017169320).jpg - CC-BY-SA-2.0
- File:Interstate 94 MI at Exit 271.jpg - CC-BY-SA-2.0
- File:Michigan's Indian trails.png - PD US not renewed, image from 1959
- File:Interstate Highway plan June 27, 1958 (MI).jpg - PD US no notice, image from 1958
- File:Uniroyal tire1.jpg - CC-BY-SA-3.0-migrated, GFDL
- File:NW255 crashsite.jpg - PD-US-NTSB
- File:Edsel Bryant Ford.jpg - PD-US-1923, image from 1921
- File:James G. O'Hara.jpg - PD-USGov-Congress
- File:Interstate 194 Michigan.jpg - CC-BY-SA-2.0
- Captions look fine. Dough4872 01:22, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Source review by Rschen7754
edit- Refs 52, 89, 73, 75 are dead.
- 86 - perhaps the location should be added?
- Also, for the map scales, sometimes you surround it in brackets, sometimes you don't.
- Michigan Department of State Highways linked twice. --Rschen7754 18:55, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
- Map scales are bracketed if they were obtained from library catalog records and not from the cited maps themselves, in keeping with standard citation practices. n 86 doesn't need the location as it's contained in the title of the cited newspaper.
As for the supposedly dead links, n52 links to a clipping, n73 still links to the target, although I just pre-emptively archived it, and n75 was flipped to its archive. I'll do some more pre-emptive archiving today. Imzadi 1979 → 19:20, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
- Done and ready to close. --Rschen7754 19:26, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.