Wikipedia:WikiProject Highways/Assessment/A-Class Review/U.S. Route 31 in Michigan

U.S. Route 31 in Michigan

edit
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Consensus has been established by this review to promote this article to A-Class.  V 02:47, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

U.S. Route 31 in Michigan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) review

Suggestion: Promote to A-Class
Nominator's comments: This is the third-longest highway in the state of Michigan (after I-75 and US 23), so it's part of my long-term goal to get all of the top 10 to FAC. Note, I do plan to add some additional photos, and weather permitting, I'll be in the Traverse City area later this week.
Nominated by: Imzadi 1979  21:07, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
First comment occurred: 01:14, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Image review by Dough4872

edit

Image review:

  1. File:US 31.svg - PD-author, should be relicensed as PD-MUTCD
  2. File:U.S. Route 31 in Michigan map.png - CC-BY-SA-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0. Map needs source for GIS data. Also the map is missing Canada and seems to imply there is a large ocean to the northeast of Michigan.
    The sources have now been added at Commons. --Rschen7754 21:01, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. File:1-196 BLACK RIVER BRIDGE SOUTH HAVEN.jpg - PD-user. I would indicate this is a concurrency between I-196 and US 31 in the caption.
  4. File:US 31, Manistee, Michigan.jpg - CC-BY-SA-2.0
  5. File:Grandview Parkway Traverse City.jpg - CC-BY-SA-3.0
  6. File:US31 Sign Looking North Bay View Michigan.jpg - CC-BY-SA-3.0
  7. File:Alanson Michigan Downtown 2 US31.jpg - CC-BY-SA-3.0
  8. File:Michigan's Indian trails.png - PD US not renewed, published in 1959
  9. File:Mitchell's Satyr butterfly.jpg - CC-BY-3.0, OTRS permission confirmed. I would add a little more context in the caption as to how this pertains to US 31. Dough4872 04:31, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Tweaks applied to the captions, and of course the bot run still needs to be done for the US Highway shields, but that's been updated too. @Algorerhythms: the GIS sources needs to be added to the map. Imzadi 1979  05:46, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I will support the images with one reservation. The map needs to be fixed before the article goes to FAC. Dough4872 03:16, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review by Admrboltz

edit
Resolved issues from Admrboltz

A more complete review will come over the following days but below are some of the first issues that pop out.

--AdmrBoltz 23:53, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Word and I did a grammatical and spelling check. I fixed one spacing issue, but other than that I don't see anything wrong on that end.

Review by Evad37

edit
Review by Evad37

I will review this article - Evad37 [talk] 02:48, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

Route description

History

Future

RJL

The rest looks good - Evad37 [talk] 04:29, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review by Rschen7754

edit
Review by Rschen7754

I will pick up the third review. --Rschen7754 03:18, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Preliminary checks
  • Everything looks good.
Lead
Route description
  • They trade places again - could be a bit more clear
  • A-2 has a duplicate link 2 paragraphs away from the first one (also run the script...)
  • runs as four-lane expressway - as a four-lane expressway
  • linear state park? linear-shaped?
  • "The highway" starting two consecutive sections in the second paragraph of NW Michigan.
  • In this area, the highway passes through an area ...
  • southeast of Charlevoix - missing a period
  • "the highway" used a lot in the rest of the paragraph. --Rschen7754 01:54, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Memorial
Future
  • it was listed an endangered species - as?
  • Until the freeway is complete, US 31 follows - I don't think the preposition and the verb go very well together.
  • Currently - as of (several times in the section) --Rschen7754 08:01, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
History
  • Do we know much about when the Mackinac Trail was built?
  • through down... town?
  • At that time... at this time... could be more clear

This concludes the review. --Rschen7754 09:14, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Imzadi1979: --Rschen7754 06:11, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • The Mackinac Trail was an Indian trail, and all of those Indian trails predated European settlement in the region, so I can't tell you when it was built/created/etc.
  • Other items copy edited. Imzadi 1979  20:16, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Spotcheck by TCN7JM

edit

As promised earlier, I will do this spotcheck. I will try to do it by the end of this weekend. TCN7JM 17:22, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I will be checking:

  • Source 10 –   Good
  • Source 11 –   I got confused at first...with where Petoskey was. The information itself is correct, but Petoskey isn't marked on the map, and I, having only visited Michigan a few times, had no clue where it was located. Is this an issue?
  • Source 12 –   Good
  • Source 13 –   Good, but Apple screenshot hurts my brain. Please switch to Windows immediately.
  • Source 14 –   Good
  • Source 15 –   Good
  • Source 16 –   Good
  • Source 17 –   Good
  • Source 18 – Cannot find, will discuss on IRC when you arrive.
  • Source 19 – Is in same document as Source 18; cannot find.
  • Source 20 –   Good
  • Source 71 –   Good
  • Source 73 –   Slight error...the source mentions a 9.5-mile stretch, not 9.1-mile.
  • Source 74 –   Good
  • Source 76 –   Good
  • Source 77 –   Good
  • Source 80 –   Good
  • Source 82 –   Good
  • Source 83 –   Good
  • Source 86 –   Good

The source numbers are as of this revision. TCN7JM 18:19, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Progress? --Rschen7754 00:08, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@TCN7JM: you have mail for the first batch (footnotes 10–20). I will compile the others here in a little bit. Imzadi 1979  00:46, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
And second batch taken care of as well. Imzadi 1979  01:14, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Alright. Unfortunately, I will be mainly unavailable until next Monday, so I'm afraid this will have to wait almost another week. I will get this done, though; I promised I would. TCN7JM 01:17, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding footnotes 18 and 19. On page 27, there is the photo of the opening of the last segment of I-96 which splits the paragraph in two.

In the spring of 1973, Gov. William G. Milliken issued an executive order reorganizing the state highway department giving it jurisdiction over all state transportation programs. He directed the highway commission and the department to develop and deliver a unified, coordinated program for total transportation for the people of Michigan.

Symbolic of this sweeping change, Milliken signed legislation Aug. 23, 1973, adding "and Transportation" to the department's traditional designation of highways only

As for footnote 19, that is split on pages 30 and 31. The bottom of 31 has the photo of M-28 along Lake Superior. Above that is another photo of airplanes which is below the start of the cited passage, the second paragraph of which is located on the lower corner of page 31:

The year-by-year need for extra dollars for roads and transportation was met in 1978 with a legislative act informally known as "Transpack."It was an abbreviated nametag for a collection of highway laws and a constitutional amendment that put the department solidly in the business of moving people as well as vehicles.

The gasoline tax was raised from nine to 11 cents a gallon, the diesel fuel levy from seven to nine cents. The weight tax went up by 30 percent, truck fees by 35 percent. The distribution formula of the newly named Michigan Transportation Fund was rewritten to give the Michigan Department of Transportation, also a new title, 46 percent of gas and weight tax revenues.

I hope that helps.

I fixed the typo related to fn 73, and I don't think it should be an issue regarding fn 11. Imzadi 1979  22:33, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

They both look fine to me. I support this article's promotion. TCN7JM 01:45, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.