Please don't be discouraged by our mess; this task force will be under construction until the start of the Fall semester. Do add yourself to our list of members |
or go shopping at WP:Law/UBX |
Welcome to the JD curriculum task force of WikiProject Law
CASEBOOK subpages
editThis list seeks to group casebooks into the recognizable categories of course title & year. Please propose potentially confusing changes at the talk page.
I think we might eventually settle for broader categories, e.g. "corporate classes," "1L classes," "constitutional classes", "intellectual property," "international law," "litigation," etc.
1L Classes
Upperclass electives
Resources
editProfessional briefs.
|
Student outlines and casebriefs.
|
Analysis.
|
Young caselaw articles should, at bare minimum, consist of case briefs. WP:SCOTUS employs the following article outline, and we should not diverge from it without their consensus. (In the long run, WP:LAW should have a "manual of style task force"/"Wikibluebook task force", whose members determine the standards for article layout, citation usage, template usage, etc. for all law-related content.)
Todo
editParticipants
edit- Andrew Gradman talk/WP:Hornbook 18:30, 28 July 2009 (UTC) (founder)
- User:Smith Jones 22:37, 7 August 2009 (UTC) (admit, specialist in International Trade and surrogatcy law and expert on procedural administration)
- Elliott Ash talk/WP:Hornbook 23:55, 01 August 2009 (UTC) (co-founder)
- Bearian (talk) 12:24, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- Pharos (talk) 03:46, 31 July 2009 (UTC) Not a law student, but I'd be glad to help from Wikimedia New York City and reaching out to the Students for Free Culture chapter at Columbia.
- Lawyer2b (talk) 05:03, 31 July 2009 (UTC) Will do what I can with limited time available. Love the project!
- DAFMM (talk), very interesting. 31st July 2009.
- Cdogsimmons (talk) 14:22, 31 July 2009 (UTC) I look forward to participating.
- ⇒SWATJester Son of the Defender 23:13, 31 July 2009 (UTC) IP and technology attorney focusing on the entertainment industry. Special focus on FOSS and open licensing.
- Ramsquire (throw me a line) 23:21, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- Riotrocket8676 You gotta problem with that? 17:21, 1 August 2009 (UTC) Am a High School student, but want to be a lawyer!
- Ute in DC (talk) 06:26, 2 August 2009 (UTC) Focus on criminal law.
- Eastlaw talk ⁄ contribs 06:58, 2 August 2009 (UTC) I will try to accomplish something here. I am not sure how much time I will have in the near-term future though.
- DizFreak talk Contributions 21:20, 2 August 2009 (UTC) Will focus on copy editing and vandalism as time allows.
- FireEscape (talk) 01:01, 3 August 2009 (UTC) Law student and new Wikipedian -- recruited by Andrew.
- Walshga (talk) 18:35, 3 August 2009 (UTC) Attorney and law school librarian, also recruited by Andrew.
- 須藤 (talk) 20:09, 3 August 2009 (UTC) As a 1L at Syracuse University, I will be certainly in the midst of the material being discussed. However, also as a 1L, I may not have a great amount of free time.
- Snarky Boy (talk) 16:29, 6 August 2009 (UTC) Sounds like an interesting project, though I've been out of law school for nearly 10 years (TEN years!?!?), I'm more than happy to help.
- Macman202 (talk) 01:15, 11 August 2009 (UTC) Just graduated from University of Nebraska College of Law.
- Harrykirk (talk) 20:30, 12 August 2009 (UTC) Attorney focusing on environmental law.
- Stephen LaPorte (talk) 02:03, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- Kermitmorningstar (talk) 05:22, 08 March 2010 (UTC) Graduate - Michigan Law. I'm incredibly busy, but I'll be happy to help when I can. :-)
- LegalSkeptic 14:19, 10 March 2010 (UTC) current 2L at Rutgers-Camden. Will try to help out with my current electives.
- Onefinalstep (talk) 14:35, 6 May 2010 (UTC) About to graduate from NYU Law. I'll help out if I can.
Other stuff
editCategories
editTemplates
editFor main project templates, see the main project page for WikiProject Law.
Infobox template
editStub templates
edit- {{Example}}
Featured/Good content
editSince few of our articles are of broad public interest, I currently feel (July 28 2009) that we should be aiming to bring articles up to "Good Article" status. Once we establish a consensus on the discussion page, we'll revise this text to be more objective.