The Black Parade - Recently just failed it's first GA nomination. Was suggested to be submitted here for help. I have tried to help this article out, however, I think I could use some more help as it was stated in the GA failed comment that it had prose and redundancy problems. OrfenUser Talk | Contribs00:55, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I copyedited this, but have since become heavily involved in it, so I don't feel comfortable being the one to proofread it and slap the done tag on it. --Moralis06:24, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Done I added a couple of new ref tags and cited some issues in hidden comments in the text. See edit history for details. Galena1120:23, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Iraklis: was in bad shape this morning. This is my first major copyedit in a long time. Please let me know if it's about finished. --Moralis
Done Nice job on the c/e, Croberts1! Just did some cleanup to eliminate wordiness, reordered sections to make sense (e.g., the Overview was at the bottom, moved it to top) etc. Galena1123:37, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Cricket World Cup — Currently a Featured Article Candidate. I feel that the quality of the prose is not up to mark, and there is also marked variation in writing style because of numerous contributors. May require light–medium copyedit. — Ambuj Saxena (☎) 06:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note this is no longer an FAC and was promoted recently as a matter of fact it's due on the main page March 13, 2007. I would remove it from here but I'm not a member of the league and don't know the policies. Quadzilla9901:09, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Done Gave it another read through, and a few (very) minor changes. I must say, I love this article - it's thorough and interesting! Hillbillygirl22:52, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I looked this over and made a couple minor grammatical corrections; however, I am uncomfortable placing it in the "done" category right now because I am not very familiar with the topic.Croberts104:10, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You asked for it, you got it. :o) I put quite a few notes in about content that didn't make sense to me. I also only lightly c/e'ed the Themes and Symbolism section, due to its "unverified/original research" tag. Galena1116:28, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I should also note that this article inspired me to create my first disambiguation page. So, a check to make sure I did that correctly would be appreciated. Galena1116:32, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The disambiguation page looks good; so good, in fact, I'm going to nominate it for Featured disambiguation. Anyway, thanks so much for your help! Mr. Happy is happy now. :o) Rintrah16:42, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]