Wikipedia:WikiProject Martial arts/Article Review/10th June 2010
- Merge what seems to be merely a technical term (if anything salvageable) with Burmese martial arts. --Bradeos Graphon Βραδέως Γράφων (talk) 14:39, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- AfD No indication subject meets WP:MANOTE. Notability is not inherited. Papaursa (talk) 21:24, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- AfD No indication subject meets WP:MANOTE. Papaursa (talk) 21:24, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- AfD Doesn't meet notability standards. Article lacks independent sources. Papaursa (talk) 21:24, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- AfD Article is currently up for PROD as unreferenced non-notable martial art. Papaursa (talk) 22:45, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- AfD No indication of notability in independent sources. Article has no independent sources. Papaursa (talk) 22:45, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- AfD article gives no reason subject is notable and has no independent sources. Papaursa (talk) 22:45, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- AfD. No sources found yet to support notability. Janggeom (talk) 15:02, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- already redirected to Osamu Noguchi Papaursa (talk) 21:24, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- AfD Article gives no reason why it's notable, although I'm not really sure this belongs under WPMA. Papaursa (talk) 22:45, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- AfD or PROD Their Taijiquan seems to be so much advertising filler for this 99% primarily sourced article. --Bradeos Graphon Βραδέως Γράφων (talk) 14:43, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- AfD I don't believe he meets WP:MANOTE and I don't see independent sources. Papaursa (talk) 22:45, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- AfD article is up for PROD since there's no real claim of notability. Papaursa (talk) 22:45, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- AfD Article doesn't show notability. Papaursa (talk) 22:45, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- AfD Subject fails WP:MANOTE and needs better sources. Papaursa (talk) 22:45, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
