Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Alexandru Averescu
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I just found it and it looks very well in my opinion, and it's proper referenced and organized. I really think this article deserves to be more than B-class! --Eurocopter tigre 14:59, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Hell yeah! very good article--Phoenix 15 (Talk) 19:26, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Support there are a rather large number of red links on the page, otherwise it looks good. TomStar81 (Talk) 20:25, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- So what? Per Manual of Style, they are welcome as long as relevant to the context. --Eurocopter tigre 20:35, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support but i agree with Tomstar that the red links need to be brought down. Kyriakos 21:04, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support but reduce the red links and I think the article should have a full bibliography, not just a list of footnotes. Cla68 13:49, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support — Well-referenced, comprehensive, and easily accessible to someone unfamiliar with the subject. As stated earlier, there are a lot of red links, and I'd support the creation of stubs to fill them up as soon as possible, particularly since they seem to cover important Romanian subjects that have been previously neglected. JKBrooks85 15:11, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.