Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Allan Walters
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Promoted -MBK004 23:21, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
| Toolbox |
|---|
Nominating this article for A-Class review because... now that Eurocopter's very enjoyable WWI contest is over, it's time to get back to some WWII and Cold War subjects! A highly regarded operational commander in the Pacific War, Walters also just missed out (twice!) on getting the RAAF's top job of Chief of the Air Staff. Any and all comments welcome... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 07:10, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 01:34, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Tks mate. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 10:43, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support This is a great article which easily meets the criteria. My only comment is that the sentence combining Walters' interest in horse racing with his death seems a bit odd unless there was a link between the two things. Nick-D (talk) 09:18, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Tks Nick - you never know...! No, you're right, and I've modifed it. It's true, I sometimes join disparate thoughts and am probably overly fond of commas. Possibly stems from reading the bible too much as a young'un (my wife, who calls herself "cautiously Catholic", likes to describe me as the most biblically-literate athiest she knows)... ;-) Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 10:43, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support No problems reported with dab links, external links, or alt text. Well Done! TomStar81 (Talk) 02:18, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Tks for reviewing, Tom! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 06:45, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.