Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Cedric Howell

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history‎ | Assessment
The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Passed by Parsecboy (talk) 02:23, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cedric Howell

edit
Nominator(s): Abraham, B.S. (talk)
Toolbox

I am nominating this article for A-Class review because I have recently expanded this article on an Australian First World War flying ace from a stub and believe it now meets the criteria. Has been passed as a Good article. Any and all comments welcome. Thanks, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 07:22, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support Comments -- Looks good, before reviewing further, here's some info from Newton, pp.40-41, that'd be worthwhile:

  • He attempted to enlist in the AIF on the outbreak of WWI but was rejected (no reason mentioned here but perhaps because he expected to be an officer and his age precluded it), before resigning his AMF commission to join the AIF as a private "early in 1915" - the last date contradicts by a year what you have but the fact he tried in 1914 is useful/usable.
  • He went with the 16th to Gallipoli, "gained the reputation of being an expert marksman", and came down with malaria.
    • In regards to his enlistment and the mention of service at Gallipoli, this is not feasible as official records state he did not enlist in the AIF until January 1916 and embark for overseas until March that year. There were some minor mentions in newspaper articles that he was a sniper, so atleast that is confirmed now, though. Abraham, B.S. (talk) 06:25, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • He was a sniper with the 46th in France.
  • He got his nickname at No. 45 Sqn due to his "tall, thin and dismal looking" appearance, brought on by a second bout of malaria just before he arrived in France.
  • He was on patrol on 15 June when German and Austrian forces struck Allied lines across the Piave River, being the first to bring news of the attack after landing back at base at 11:40am. With the aircraft refuelled and 'bombed up', in company with the rest of the squadron, he then led his flight on a total of four sorties against the enemy insurgents. No. 45 Squadron succeeded in destroying with its bombs a pontoon bridge, a boat, and a trench filled with soldiers, before inflicting at least a hundered casualties with machine-gun fire. Heavy rain washed other bridges away and by 18 June the stranded Austrian forces on the Allied bank of the river were routed by a counterattack. Foregoing is in my own words, so you can safely use as is or alter at your pleasure...
  • Claim-by-claim list of Howell's victories confirms four "destroyed" and one "out of control" on 12 July 1918. He certainly made a habit of multiple kills: four on 13 May 1918; two on 8 June; two on 19 June; five on 12 July; and two on 15 July. Whew!
  • On the drowning: "Peasants on the shores of Corfu reported later that they heard cries for help coming from the sea that night but it was too rough to attempt a rescue".

I'll come back when you've reviewed and added any of the above as and how you see fit. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 05:08, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Will definately get to adding this info in. Thanks, Ian! Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 05:30, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Aside from the Gallipoli bit, added in all the information I coulrd. I really have to get a copy of/access to this bloody book! Thanks very much for that, Ian. :) Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 06:25, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well, yes, it's a good 'un - shame it seems to be a bit scarce. That said, my use of quotes from him above was more so you could see just what he wrote for your own information, not because I thought all the quotes were memorable in themselve - hence my further light copyedit where I paraphrase a few of them...! Anyway, it's all good so altered to support - well done. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 08:53, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
One thing I forgot earlier that did trouble me a bit: not sure that employing the term "Central" as shorthand for "Central Powers", and equivalent to "Allied", is very common - who uses it? Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 10:32, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I can't quite specificially remember where I have seen it used before, but I have seen it used just as "Allied", etc, is. Also, I used it in Raymond Brownell without any issues/concerns being raised. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 00:29, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SupportComments

  • Lead, "In one particular combat on 12 July 1918" is odd phrasing. Perhaps, "one particular encounter" or "engagement"?
  • Fighter pilot over Italy, "Two days later, Howell was credited with bringing a Central plane," What?
    • Sorry, missing word there. Corrected to "... bringing down..."
  • English to Australia flight, "Warringal Cemetry". Should this be "Cemetery"?

Once these are taken care of, I will be happy to support. Nice work on another article! Dana boomer (talk) 02:24, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the review. :) Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 02:45, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good and thanks for the prompt response. Changed to support. Dana boomer (talk) 16:46, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_history/Assessment/Cedric_Howell&oldid=342193781"