Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Dęblin–Irena Ghetto

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 22:20, 2 July 2020 (UTC) « Return to A-Class review list[reply]

Dęblin–Irena Ghetto

Instructions for nominators and reviewers

Nominator(s): Buidhe (talk)

I think this article meets the A-class criteria and I'm hoping to get some feedback in order to polish it for a future FAC. Dęblin–Irena was an anomaly in the history of the Holocaust in Poland. While 99% of the Jews in surrounding areas were murdered, in Dęblin–Irena the chance of surviving was as high as ten percent. The article explains why. (In short: some were able to make themselves indispensable to the Luftwaffe, which had a key airfield nearby, and this prevented them from being murdered.) Thanks in advance. b uidhe 01:34, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CommentsSupport by CPA-5

Because I have Polish ancestry it's my duty to review this nomination as soon as possible. Am happy another concentration camp in modern-day Poland is nominated for A- and maybe later FA-class. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 20:52, 2 March 2020 (UTC) Lead[reply]

Dęblin–Irena was a Nazi ghetto for Jews in Irena (merged into nearby Dęblin in 1953), a Polish town located in the Lublin District I'm a little bit confused here. First why is this article called "Dęblin–Irena" if the Ghetto was only in Irena? Or is this the most commonly used term in the source?
- Only one source has "Irena" and several have "Dęblin", while others call it "Dęblin–Irena" so that seemed a reasonable compromise between commonname and historical accuracy.
In 1942, two thousand Jews arrived from Slovakia and hundreds more from nearby ghettos that had been liquidated Pipe Slovakia to the First Slovak Republic.
- I ended up wikilinking to List of Holocaust transports from Slovakia, which has a link to that article.
The first deportation was on 6 May 1942 and took around 2,500 Jews to Sobibór extermination camp --> "The first deportation was in May 1942 and took around 2,500 Jews to Sobibór extermination camp"
- Done
In October 1942, the ghetto was liquidated; about 2,500 Jews were deported --> "In October that same year, the ghetto was liquidated; about 2,500 Jews were deported"
- Done
retained as inmates of forced-labor camps Link forced-labor camps.
- I don't see how that article (Labor camp) would be helpful to understanding this subject. In my opinion, "forced-labor camp" is pretty self explanatory.

To me, it shouldn't be helpful to understand the subject, this might be a common term but sometimes common terms like this use information which most of the readers don't know. Like an example do you know when the first labour camp was in use? I don't think so, that's why it might be helpful to link it. If you disagree I'm fine with that because this is just my view about labour camps.

Background

Dęblin and Irena (Yiddish: מאדזשיץ‎, Modzhitz)[3] are located 68.7 kilometres (42.7 mi) northwest of Lublin in Poland In this sentence you used British kilometres and it's a little bit weird that both towns have only one word in Yiddish?
- As stated below the two towns were long considered one unit. The majority of sources imply that the Yiddish word covered the entire area although some state that it was just one neighborhood.
- Fixed British spelling
and at an important point on the Lublin–Warsaw rail line Was this an important station or an important rail intersection?
- Both, but the junction was more important, I think
The two municipalities, having long been considered one unit, were officially merged in 1953. Weird spot to have this sentence in the background, I'd put them in the aftermath except you have a good reason?
- I think it helps explain the confusion between Dęblin and Irena in many of the sources. Moved to footnote.
Local Jews supported the January Uprising of 1863 --> "Local Jews supported the January Uprising in 1863"
- Done
Modzitz Rebbe Yisrael Taub settled in the town in 1889.[6][5] Re-oder the refs here.
- Done
later participated in the development of the town as a summer resort.[7][3] Same as above.
- Done
In 1927, the civilian population of Dęblin and Irena was 4,860, including 3,060 Jews You mean populations?
- I think both of these are technically correct. The first usage seems to be more common.
Since 1927, Dęblin housed the Polish Air Force Academy --> "Dęblin also housed the Polish Air Force Academy in that same year"
- I think that your suggestion would be confusing. The Polish Air Force Academy was founded in 1927.
the airfield was one of the largest in Poland. --> "its airfield was one of the largest in Poland."
- Done
During the German invasion of Poland, the Luftwaffe bombed Dęblin between 2 and 7 September Add the year here?
- Done
Link Polish Army
- Done
on 11 September the remaining Polish forces detonated the ammunition and withdrew[10] The Wehrmacht arrived on 12 or 20 September --> "on 11 September the remaining Polish forces detonated their ammunition and withdrew,[10] while on the 12th or the 20th the Germans arrived in the region" and pipe German to Nazi Germany.
- I don't think that's an improvement. "Germans" is less specific than "Wehrmacht" and the suggested sentence structure reads awkwardly to me.
community was forced to pay a fine of 20,000 złoty.[4][11][3] Re-order the refs.
- Done
The Judenrat ("Jewish Council") was formed at the end of 1939[4][3] Same as above and change "1939" to "the year".
- Done
later than other Judenräte in the region I assume "Judenräte" is the plural form of "Judenrat"?
- Yes
conscripted for forced labor in Janiszów, Bełżec, and Pawłowice Link these places.
- Done
The first chair of the Judenrat, Leizer Teichman, and the secretary were expelled in 1941 You mean chairman?
- Yes, the words are synonymous
and then a Konin native named Drayfish in September 1941 Remove the year here.
- Not done—although the last reference is to 1941, I think this could lead to confusion.

The rest will follow soon. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 21:25, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Staromiejska Street was removed from the ghetto in September 1942; its residents moved to Bankowa Why was it removed?
- None of the sources say
so many of the Jews were able to survive by trading material goods for food With the Poles?
- Yes, clarified this
A Polish-language secular school, run by Aida Milgroijm-Citronbojm, instructed 70 to 100 pupils When?
- I would guess that this occurred throughout the existence of the ghetto, but this is not made explicit.
In late 1941, Poles were banned from entering the ghetto Wait a second in the above paragraph you told that Poles were allowed to enter and live in the ghetto why does this sentence do not support this, this doesn't make sense? Also we should go chronically because here we have a sentence about late 1941 but this sentence "Staromiejska Street was removed from the ghetto in September 1942;" tells us it's not chronically?
- I'm not being completely chronological here, but a mix of chronological and topical. If I moved the second part about the boundaries changing, I feel that would be more confusing because readers would have to check back to find out what Staromiejska Street was. The first paragraph deals with the original situation/overview; the second discusses changes that happened in late 1941/early 1942.
at a thirty-bed hospital run by Dr. Isaar Kawa from Konin; See MOS:DOCTOR and what kinda doctor?
- Fixed MOS. Source doesn't say.
some Jews fled to towns there including Dęblin–Irena;[19] twenty Jews were shot for being unregistered refugees When?
- Source doesn't say explicitly but it is in the section dealing with late 1941/early 1942.
The Judenrat's command altered again as Drayfish was executed, accused of filing complaints with the Puławy County administration Name is needed here.
- I'm not sure whose name you're looking for? Source says "In April 1942, Drayfish, among a group of local Jews sent to a penal camp in Kazimierz Dolny reportedly for registering complaints with the Pulawy Kreishauptmann’s office, was shot. Timber merchant Yisrael Weinberg replaced him."
These consisted mainly of Jews expelled from Puławy Ghetto and the Warthegau region Where was the Puławy Ghetto?
- In Puławy. Linked in article now.
On 13 and 14 May 1942, two transports of 2,042 Slovak Jews arrived from Prešov.[20][18] Link Slovak Jews and re-oder the refs.
- Done
These included 300 people from Ryki, 300 from Gniewoszów and Zwoleń, and a group from Stężyca A group of how many?
- Not known.
In August 1942, 5,800 Jews were reported to be living in the ghetto, of whom only 1,800 were from Dęblin Remove the year here the last time mentioned date also used 1942 so I think it's clear to the readers.
- Done

More coming. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 17:06, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- Thank you! b uidhe 03:09, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I don't really have the time to continue this. 'Cause of our lockdown, school and real life issues I won't be that much online for a week or longer. :/ Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 22:30, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There's WP:NODEADLINE. Thanks for your comments and I hope your real life issues resolve in your favor. b uidhe 22:35, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Forced labor

Until late 1942, Jews earned wages as forced laborers I assume they got low wages paid?
- That's the implication, although it's not stated explicitly.
Many were conscripted to work for German companies such as Schwartz and Hochtief They were specialised in?
- Reworded this part
Schultz was under contract for construction on the Ostbahn.[24][13] Re-order the refs here.
- Done
The municipality conscripted other Jews for tasks such as street cleaning or snow clearing; these workers were not paid I would move this sentence to the first one and add "with exceptions to tasks such as street cleaning and snow clearing; these workers were not paid" These workers weren't paid even before late 1942; I think this needs clarification.
- Reworded
The Jews from Dęblin–Irena tried to take the best jobs, so 200 of the Slovak --> "The Jews from Dęblin–Irena tried to take the best jobs; 200 of the Slovak"
- Done
so 200 of the Slovak deportees ended up working for the municipality. Another 200 of the Slovaks worked for the Schultz firm following an expansion Do we know who they were? Communists, Jews, Poles or others?
- The only Slovaks mentioned in this article are the Slovak Jews who were deported from Presov in May, which is discussed in the paragraph immediately preceding this section. Do you think this would benefit from additional clarification here?
Survivors recalled that although German soldiers supervising the forced laborers tended to treat them relatively well, some Polish supervisors beat Jews, and the Ukrainian guards at the railway camp were especially harsh This doesn't look neutral in my view; in the last few years Isreal and Poland had a controversial topic about the Holocaust. Especially when Israelians call those camps Polish after the Polish Government passed a law which would criminalise the use of the expressions "Polish death camp" and "Polish concentration camp" or Poles collaborated with the Nazis. Even if it was written by a professor I think (and I try to be neutral here) a second independent source who supports Farkash's claims is needed. And probably because this is a controversial topic without a second independent source it'd probably be removed by someone who thinks this claim is "bull shit".
- All this says is that the postwar testimony of survivors stated something, which could be verified by looking at the individual testimonies that Farkash cites. Furthermore, the German soldiers were in this case Wehrmacht troops, and there's evidence that Wehrmacht soldiers did not mistreat Jewish forced laborers as much as the SS. This sentence has already been discussed on the talk page and was kept in.
Jews had to work twelve hours a day, but were treated relatively well by the Luftwaffe personnel This is the second time that let's say Germans treated the Jews relatively well; maybe add the "Luftwaffe" to "although German soldiers supervising the forced laborers tended to treat them relatively well".
- Removed as redundant.
Link typhus epidemic (it has a separate article then typhus itself).
- typhus epidemic is a redlink. b uidhe 21:18, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Epidemic typhus not.

"Epidemic typhus" refers to a specific type of typhus, rather than typhus epidemics.

More is coming. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 10:18, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I look forward to it! Thanks again. b uidhe 21:18, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

First deportation (6 May 1942)

The first deportation was on 6 May 1942,[30][18] Re-order the refs here.
- Done
Slovak deportees who arrived a week later.[31][18][32] Same as above.
- Done
Jews to assemble in the main square at 09:00 hours Hours isn't needed.
- Removed
Most of the Jews from neighboring communities Does this sentence miss something?
- Removed, as it is discussed in the next paragraph
and 2,300 to 2,500 from Dęblin—mainly the elderly --> "and 2,300–2,500 from Dęblin—mainly the elderly"
- Not done.
fter the deportation, the bodies of the dead were collected at the synagogue and removed from the ghetto in carts To where?
- Source doesn't say.
deportations in the Lublin district --> "deportations in the Lublin District" Proper noun?
- Capitalized

That's it for now; more coming. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 16:04, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Second deportation (15 October 1942)

I'm not sure why the dates are needed in both the First and Second deportation?
- I thought that the dates were helpful, but since you disagree I've removed them.
Under the command of SS-Obersturmführer Grossman; gendarmes Did Nazi Germany had a gendarme?
- I wasn't sure exactly what force Crago was referring to, so I followed the source.
Many Jews tried to enter the Luftwaffe camp I'm a little bit confused why they did that?
- Clarified
Talia Farkash estimates that about 500, including 60–90 young children A little introduction of hers is helpful?
- Moved descriptor to first mention
were shot while clearing the houses.[18][10] Re-order the refs here.
- Done
about 100 total --> "about 100 in total"
- Done
retained to clean up the ghetto.[18][10] Re-order the refs here.
- Done
Perhaps another 100 Jews were hiding illegally in the ghetto
- I'm not sure what change you're suggesting here?

Oops, I forgot to add the question here. How can Jews illegally hide in their own ghetto? Didn't they want to work? And if they hide weren't the Germans not hunting them?

The Germans ordered all the Jews to report and be deported; these are those who refused without permission. Changed "illegaly" to "without permission" to make this more clear. The Germans were probably looking for them.^{[original research?]}

Dęblin Fortress and 200–500 of the Luftwaffe's workers.[18][10] --> "Dęblin Fortress and 200–500 of the Luftwaffe's workers.[18][10]" Re-oder the refs here.
- Done
Estimates of the number at the Luftwaffe camp range frmo 1,000 (Encyclopedia of Camps and Ghettos) A from typo here.
- Fixed
rest were deported in late 1943.[18][10] Re-order the refs here.
- Done
hundreds of Jews were still alive, they were murdered during Operation Harvest Festival Because this was part of an operation I'd change "murdered" to "killed".
- The operation was exclusively to murder Jews.

More coming. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 11:41, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Camp leader

The camp leader (German: Lagerälteste) at the Luftwaffe Unlink German because it's too common.
- Done
Is there a better picture than this "File:UT_2_w_Szkole_Orlat_w_Deblinie.jpg"? It doesn't really make sense to add an image about the Polish Air Force in the town in 1947 if we are talking about the camp leader and the conditions.
- That was the closest in time photograph that I could find of the airfield, which I think is good to show a picture of. You can see other photographs of the airfield in Commons:Category:Lotnicza Akademia Wojskowa, although many of them are under dubious licensing. There are no free German photographs that I'm aware of.

More coming. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 12:33, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Conditions

good compared to other camps.[48][42] Re-order the refs.
were allowed to practice their religion.[49][29] Same as above.
The children received education in Polish, but had to hide when the SS conducted inspections This is so confusing; they received education by whom?
- Clarify
with the camp command was partially responsible for the good conditions What was the other responsible part?
- Farkash is vague on this point, and I think it would be misreprenting her to say that it was entirely responsible, but she doesn't explicitly mention any other factors.
What's a Volkesdeutscher?
friction between the two communities.[55][27] Re-order the refs.

More coming. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 15:43, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Aftermath

it was illegal for them to settle in town --> "it was illegal for them to settle in the town"
- Done
prisoner of the ghetto,[18][10] Re-order the refs here.

Second review

It looks like that the lead doesn't summarise the background, Ghetto, Forced labor and the Aftermath section which it should by MOS:LEAD.
- Done
pay a fine of 20,000 złoty.[5][4][12] Re-order the refs here and do we know how much that is in the major currencies (US dollar, Euro or British pounds) today?
- It's very difficult to say given the unsettled situation of the Polish currency just after the German invasion, before a fixed exchange rate (with reichsmarks) was established.
consisting of local Volksdeutsche and Ukrainian auxiliaries Can you add here a note what Volksdeutsche means?
- done
the Dęblin train station (some 2.5 kilometers (1.6 mi) away) Per MOS:UNITNAMES; this is the second time we mention here km fully written.
- done
received kosher food for the week of Passover.[52][44] Re-order the refs here.
Link Sergeant Major.
- done

That's it I believe. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 14:54, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- Thanks so much for your review; I have made the requested changes.

I'd like to support this article but I first want to see if PM's comments could be addressed and become a support. Originally their comments were also my comments but I dropped them because he already comment it and I'm not gonna comment something which is already mentioned by another review. But he got a point and I believe their comments should be first addressed before I could give you my support. Anything else looks great. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 19:31, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
CPA-5, As I stated below, I don't think the ghetto and labor camp are independently notable from each other, or that a split would improve the article. I'm happy to retitle to something like The Holocaust in Dęblin–Irena or History of the Jews in Dęblin–Irena (1939–1945) but both these titles are basically WP:OR as sources don't use them. b uidhe 23:57, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Long time no see Buidhe, hopefully you are all right? But that's true and sadly sometimes OR is needed to settle down the discussion or follow the guidelines. Of course I'm not saying that ORs' titles like those are needed here and now. Anyway, the title was, in general, okay to me and all my comments are now addressed; which means I can give it a support. Am happy to see another Polish Holocaust article getting an FA-class (and hopefully it will maintain like that). Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 10:30, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Piotrus

I have reviewed this before GA, and the article is still solid. There was some sock activity in early January but I think the sock has been weeded out in a wide range proxy range ban, so the article is stable. I am still mildly concerned whether the aftermath section isn't overly detailed, and would welcome further comments on this. Still, I cannot figure out which article any of the information from it would belong instead, and it would be a shame to lose referenced content. So right now I don't have any changes to suggest, nor errors to point out. Good job :) --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:59, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, since the last review the article name has been changed, I would like to hear the rationale, since none is given on article's talk. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:37, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Piotrus: Both CPA-5 and Peacemaker67 objected to the fact that the article's content did not exactly match what the title suggested it would be. This is a fair objection, but it wouldn't be appropriate to split the article because 1) any split would involve large amounts of duplication and 2) the ghetto and Luftwaffe camp are not independently notable and 3) it would lead to the deletion of encyclopedic material, for instance on the other labor camps besides the Luftwaffe camp or detail on deportations which passed through Deblin. (t · c) buidhe 01:51, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the explanation. I have no objections or concerns to raise. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:07, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image review - pass

All images are appropriately licenced, positioned, captioned and alt texted. Gog the Mild (talk) 11:24, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reluctant opposeCommentsSupport by PM

Great work on this so far, but I am having trouble with what the scope of the article is. I have a few comments:

the Background section goes into things that happened after the ghetto was established (in the last para). I suggest moving this down into the Ghetto section and integrating it with the material in that section
- Not done—since sources disagree over which of the Judenrat were in charge at one time, splitting this material up would increase confusion.
Sonderdienst means "special service" (dienst meaning service) not "special forces" (Spezialeinheiten) which has a totally different connotation relating to elite troops.
- Fixed
suggest "local Volksdeutsche who were later supplemented by Ukrainian auxiliaries recruited after the Axis invasion of the Soviet Union in June 1941."
- Source doesn't say so, so it would be original research
"More Jews arrived in May 1941: 1,000 from the ghettos at Warsaw, Częstochowa, and Opole, although they were not housed in the ghetto but at work sites in the area" really isn't about this ghetto
"On 13 and 14 May 1942, two transports totalling 2,042 Slovak Jews"
- Done
link Hochtief
- Done
The Forced labor section is all over the place chronologically, and also strays from sticking to information about the ghetto and its occupants, and seems to refer to other forced labor camps and projects in the district for which the link to the ghetto isn't clear
- All the camps were located in the town of Deblin/Irena.
this also applies in the Deportation, murder, and liquidation section, where there are details of deportations from places other than this ghetto
- I do think it's relevant to mention deportations that passed through the town in a substantial way and would have been noticed by the local Jews, and to contexualize the deportation of Irena's Jews as part of a systematic operation.
was the Luftwaffe camp part of the ghetto? The ghetto has been defined in geographical terms earlier, and doesn't appear to include the Luftwaffe camp
I'm reluctantly putting this review on hold as an oppose, because I don't think it sticks to the existing scope of the ghetto, and ranges across Holocaust-related activities throughout the district or region, including Jews who were apparently never held in the ghetto and forced laborers who didn't live in the ghetto. I suggest it be trimmed down to focus much more closely on ghetto-related material only, or properly expanded to cover all Holocaust-related activities in the district or region, with appropriate retitling. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:30, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I considered a split, but I'm not sure that either the ghetto or the Luftwaffe forced-labor camp are independently notable, since there is only one source which goes into detail on the ghetto and two for the forced labor camp. Such a split would also require duplicating a lot of material. I am happy to retitle but I don't think a title such as "The Holocaust in Dęblin–Irena" would be suitable since it does not occur in any of the sources and I've never seen such a descriptor applied to towns (only countries and regions). b uidhe 22:20, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How's the review going PM? A couple of weeks have been passed without any replies here? This just reminds me I should continue mine too. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 18:52, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've settled on the oppose based on my scope concerns. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:58, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retitle

I've retitled the article "History of the Jews in Dęblin–Irena during World War II" and rewritten the lead to address the scope concerns. @Peacemaker67 and CPA-5: Thanks so much for your comments, I wonder if you would consider supporting? Thanks, b uidhe 21:33, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have another look. I'm conscious that this is getting a bit old, and that I'm procrastinating about several of your noms. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:47, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I really appreciate your feedback, you always have something helpful to say. b uidhe 03:23, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Restart

the scope issue is resolved as far as I am concerned
Slovakia needs a link in the lead, as does Austria (suggest Austria under National Socialism
- Done
"Thousands of Jews lived in the towns" as we are talking about two municipalities at the time
- done
"became a collection centers"
- done
you could link Lublin District
- done
"returned to the towns"
- Reworded
link Vistula
- Not done, already linked at first mention in Background section
The Wehrmacht arrived - I think you mean the German Army? Unless the Luftwaffe also arrived?
- Done. (Source actually says Wehrmacht but it's being used as a synonym for the German Army)
just be consistent with the hyphenation of compound adjectives like forced-labor ie "forced labor units"
- done
move the link to Konin to first mention
- Done
suggest "and after the ghetto was established, warned residents of searches" as the ghetto hasn't been mentioned to this point
- Done
link Warsaw District
- These are references to the city, linked to that.
do you mean "winter clothing ~~requisitioned~~confiscated"?
- done
"twenty young women being shot" when?
"twenty Jews were shot" when?
- The source doesn't say exactly when these events happened, but implies that it happened over the winter of 1941–1942.
link Puławy County
- Not done because our article on Puławy County is a new administrative division (since 1999) that does not include Deblin (which is currently in Ryki County). I think a link would be more confusing than helpful especially since neither article has any information on the Nazi administration in the area.
suggest using "German-annexed Reichsgau Wartheland" instead of Warthegau region
- Done
when referring to Dęblin or Irena do you mean Dęblin–Irena? Suggest being consistent and using the hyphenated one
- Well, both the ghetto and the Luftwaffe camp were in Irena, so deleted many of the references to Deblin and made sure that references were consistent.
"the Ukrainian guards at the railway camp were especially harsh" what railway camp? First mention I can see
- Clarified
suggest linking Ukrainian Auxiliary Police
- Done
link SS
link Obersturmführer
- done
"About 215 to 500 Jews were shot while the Germans and their helpers were clearing the houses"
- Done
"Estimates of the number at the Luftwaffe camp range from 1,000 ~~(Encyclopedia of Camps and Ghettos)~~[17] to 2,000 ~~(Silberklang)~~,[28]"
- Done
Poniatowa→ Poniatowa concentration camp
- Done
suggest "Hundreds of Jews were still alive in the remaining labor camps in Puławy County, but they were murdered during Operation Harvest Festival (2–3 November 1943)."
- Done
for collaborator link collaborationism
- Done
suggest Shabbat→the Sabbath, as that is by far the most common word used in English
- Not for the Jewish Sabbath, which is overwhelmingly called "Shabbat" in English-language sources.
do the sources say what sergeant major rank these men were? Stabsfeldwebel?
- Unfortunately, they just say "Sergeant Major" without further clues.
drop the comma from "Although Kattengel was distrusted, because he roamed the camp with a dog and whip"
- Done
link Red Army
- Done
"being run by the ~~Wehrmacht~~Luftwaffe"
- No, the source specifically states "Wehrmacht"
"Milicja Obywatelska police chief"
- done
suggest adding that Brandt was tried by a Soviet military court and shot
- Done
you may not have any another image for the top, but the top image would be better in the relevant section
- since most readers won't read past the lead, I think it's better to keep the image where it will be seen.

That's it. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:37, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! b uidhe 07:41, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source review - pass

The sources are almost entirely scholarly, the trivial exceptions are used appropriately. The article appears to be well sourced. Gog the Mild (talk) 13:32, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.