Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/HMS Argus (I49)
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Nominator(s): Sturmvogel 66 (talk)
I am nominating this article for A-Class review because I believe that it meets the criteria. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:37, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright check: Both images have dead links as sources. Can you find their current location? Cambalachero (talk) 18:21, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The link to the image in the infobox is valid. I fixed the other one.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:33, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Not sure about this, both are dead when I try them. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 05:47, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Both are valid and working.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:55, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Not sure about this, both are dead when I try them. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 05:47, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Why not add File:Aircraft in hangar of HMS Argus (I49) c1942.jpg to the article? It's a fairly rare photo of the inside of a carrier hangar, which I think would be a useful addition. It's also fine copyright-wise. Parsecboy (talk) 21:35, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Excellent idea.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:55, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The dazzle camo image appears to be from the IWM database there are several othere there which could be suitable. [1] Jim Sweeney (talk) 20:23, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not really seeing anything there that offers something we don't already have.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:55, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
_c1942.jpg){kind=link}
Support, conditional on the image links being resolved. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 05:47, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Copyedited so pls check I haven't stuffed any meaning by accident.
- Happy with structure, prose and detail now, only caveats are:
- While I understand what "flying off" means and it might even be intuitive to a non-military audience, the term "launching" may be better if you're taking to FAC. I'm pretty sure it's also a term used in military literature re. carriers and might be better for the population at large...
- What does "power-worked" mean? Do you simply mean "powered"?
- Citing and referencing look okay to me; no spotchecks as there are no online refs. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 05:47, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support
- Apologies, I'd read this ages back and thought I'd added my support in! Hchc2009 (talk) 07:47, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support
- Another first rate article. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:21, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.