Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Liberté-class battleship
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Article promoted by Zawed (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 08:20, 11 November 2019 (UTC) « Return to A-Class review list
Instructions for nominators and reviewers
Liberté-class battleship (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Toolbox |
---|
As a bit of a break from the German warships I've been doing lately, here's another French one. These ships had interesting careers; the first one blew up in 1911 and the other three saw action in World War I and two of them got involved in the Allied intervention in the Russian Civil War in 1919. Thanks to everyone who reviews the article. Parsecboy (talk) 12:32, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
CommentsSupport by CPA-5
edit
Happy to see you again Nate. I hope you had a great holiday. :]
- It was pretty good - my wife ran the Chicago Marathon on Sunday
- Great to hear, my holiday would start from 26 to 30 October. We're going to Paris in la France.
- In 1916, the ships were sent to Greece to put pressure Pipe Greece to the Kingdom of Greece.
- Done
- were sent to the Black Sea to monitor German forces Pipe German to the German Empire.
- Done, but linked in the first para instead
- were sold for scrap in 1921 and broken up in Italy Pipe Italy to the Kingdom of Italy.
- Done
- in the Fleet Law of 1900, which called for No link for the Fleet Law of 1900?
- No, unfortunately - articles on the French Navy are poorly developed at this point (hopefully we'll fix that eventually!)
- The law was a reaction to the German 1898 Naval Law Pipe German to the German Empire.
- Done
- battleship displacing 13,600 metric tons (13,400 long tons) Link for both tonnes?
- Done
- Link full load.
- Done
- the arrangement proved to have several problems --> "proved to have several problems one of them was the conning tower was"?
- I'm not sure I follow your suggested wording
- their crews were increased to 44 officers and 765 enlisted men to include an admiral's staff Why were they increased?
- The admiral's staff
- with six electric generators; two 500-amp generators Shouldn't it be "with six electric generators; two 500-ampere generators"
- I suppose on first usage, yeah
- It extended from .5 m (1 ft 8 in) below Americanised ".5 m" usage.
- Fixed
- with a 216 mm (8.5 in)-thick rear wall Remove hyphen.
- Done
- tube that was 200 mm-thick protected Same as above.
- Done
- in the western Mediterranean and Atlantic Link Mediterranean.
- Done
- the battleships of the fleet withdrew to Corfu and Malta Island or the Crown Colony of Malta?
- Eventually I'll fix these beforehand, like the ".0"s and "0 in"s ;)
- At the outbreak of war in August 1914 Pipe "outbreak of war" to WWI.
- Linked directly
- Dardanelles Division fighting in the last stages of the Gallipoli Campaign --> "Dardanelles Division fighting in the last stages of the Gallipoli campaign"
- Done
- Capitalise and link "Greek army"
- Done
- were sent into the Black Sea to oversee the demilitarization of Russian warships To where?
- Jordan & Dumas aren't specific, unfortunately - presumably Sevastopol, though I know the Germans seized Imperator Aleksandr III in Novorossiysk (though the Brits took control of her, not the French - the point being there were other ports with Russian warships.
- including visits to Spain, Monaco, and Italy Pipe Italy to the Kingdom of Italy.
- Done
That's anything from me. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 21:57, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks CPA. Parsecboy (talk) 17:32, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
- You're welcome, mate. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 17:11, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
CommentsSupport by PM
edit
This article is in great shape. I have some comments:
- Lead
- suggest "The Liberté class consisted of four pre-dreadnought battleships"
- Works for me
- suggest "In 1909, Liberté, Justice, and Vérité visited the United States" as "three of the ships" is redundant
- Done
- suggest "Vérité was briefly deployed to the Dardanelles in September 1914" if that is right?
- Yep
- "where
itthey saw little activity"- Fixed
- link Toulon
- Done
- Body
- suggest "France's primary enemy"→"France's principal potential opponent" as they weren't exactly enemies, just potential ones
- Fair enough, but I wager if you asked your average Frenchman in 1913 who their enemy was...
- lk=on for the first displacement conversion in the Design section
- It is linked in the second para
- "draft was limited
atto 8.4 m (28 ft)"- Done
- you could put lk=on for the displacement in the infobox
- Done
- suggest putting a note in the infobox about the variation in boilers for Justice
- Done
- suggest adding the range to the infobox
- Done
- where were the secondary guns located?
- Added a description
- "their propellant charges before ammunition"?
- The turrets had a storage capacity of 12 shells and their associated propellant charges (each divided into three bagged charges) - does adding a comma at "...charges, before..." make it clearer?
- I take it all the tertiary battery guns were in open mounts in the superstructure? Is there any information about their location that could be added?
- Added details on this
- suggest putting the lower belt range in the infobox
- Added
- is there a link for cemented steel?
- There is, and it's there
- "metropolitan France"→"Metropolitan France" and link
- Done
- no damage from the collision between Justice and Démocratie?
- Added a bit on that
That's all I could find. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:21, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks PM. Parsecboy (talk) 19:21, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
- No worries, supporting. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:33, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
Source review
edit- Add ampersands to multi-author works to match those in the refs
- Done
- Why is Alger important for Wells?
- Don't know that he is, but I figure if I have the editor, I'll add the info, seeing as it doesn't hurt
- I don't agree, but not going to fuss about it.
- Don't know that he is, but I figure if I have the editor, I'll add the info, seeing as it doesn't hurt
- Footnotes are properly formatted
- References otherwise properly formatted
- References are from RS authors and publishers--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:52, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks Sturm. Parsecboy (talk) 17:37, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
- Good to go.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:01, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks Sturm. Parsecboy (talk) 17:37, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
Image review - pass
edit- "File:Liberté class battleship diagrams Brasseys 1906.jpg" needs a US PD tag.
- Added
- Alt text?
- Maybe left justify the image of Justice?
- There's not room to do that (at least not on the size monitors I have access to) but I can move the one below to the left side.
- That works for me. Thanks.
Parsecboy (talk) 12:06, 21 October 2019 (UTC) Gog the Mild (talk) 19:12, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
- Passing. Gog the Mild (talk) 12:19, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Comments by AustralianRupert
editSupport: G'day, Nate, nice work. Not a lot stood out to me for A-class. I have a few minor comments/suggestions: AustralianRupert (talk) 01:55, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- there are no dab or duplicate links (no action required)
- ext links all work (no action required)
- everything in the infobox is mentioned and referenced in the body (no action required)
- in the lead, Liberté was destroyed by an accidental explosion of unstable propellant charges in 1911 -- maybe mention this happened in Toulon here, as it is implied in the last paragraph of the lead
- Good idea
- Though earlier French battleships had carried a mix of several types of shells, including armor-piercing (APC), semi-armor-piercing (SAPC), cast iron, high-explosive, and shrapnel shells, the Libertés standardized on a load-out of just APC and SAPC shells --> "Though earlier French battleships had carried
a mix ofseveral types of shells, including armor-piercing (APC), semi-armor-piercing (SAPC), cast iron, high-explosive, and shrapnel shells, the Libertés standardized on a load-out of just APC and SAPC shells"- Done
- Early on 25 September, Liberté was destroyed by an accidental magazine explosion that killed nearly three hundred of her crew. --> "Early on 25 September, while at Toulon, Liberté was destroyed by an accidental magazine explosion that killed nearly three hundred of her crew"?
- Works for me
- followed, and in later August --> "followed, and later that month"?
- Done
- 2nd Squadron ships then were --> "2nd Squadron ships were then"
- Done
- Justice was involved in a mutiny of war-weary sailors in April 1919 --> "Justice's war weary crew were involved in a mutiny in April 1919"?
- Works for me
- in the References, is there an ISSN or OCLC for the Wells source (United States Naval Institute Proceedings)?
- Added an ISSN
- in the References, is there an ISSN or OCLC for the Windsor source (Popular Mechanics)?
- Added an OCLC. Thanks AR. Parsecboy (talk) 15:57, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- No worries, great work as usual. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 07:27, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Added an OCLC. Thanks AR. Parsecboy (talk) 15:57, 4 November 2019 (UTC)