Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tom Derrick
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Closed as promoted by Woody (talk) 17:52, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am requesting this article be reviewed for A-Class as I believe it meets the criteria. I have significantly expanded this article over the past few weeks, with Nick-D adding a substantial proportion of information to the "Later war service" and "Legacy" sections. The article is also currently a Good article nominee, and I have ambitions to take it to FAC some time in the future. Thanks, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 07:22, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I've made too many contributions to this article to be able to give an unbiased vote on it, but for what it's worth, I think that this article meets the A-class criteria. Nick-D (talk) 07:37, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support
- I found some typos, which I corrected myself
- Thanks for that, Hawkeye. I'm notoriously bad with spelling. Abraham, B.S. (talk) 23:16, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- You can tell from the photo that the "Australian flag" he raised on Sattelberg was actually the Australian Red Ensign.
- I have now changed the caption to reflect that. Abraham, B.S. (talk) 23:16, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I found some typos, which I corrected myself
Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:27, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks mate. Abraham, B.S. (talk) 23:16, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - I added in the fact that the bridge was on a freeway, just so people know it is a major structure and not some mickey mouse one. YellowMonkey (click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 03:21, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for that, mate. Abraham, B.S. (talk) 03:47, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Eurocopter (talk) 20:41, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.