Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Peer review/I Corps (United States)

I Corps (United States)

Article is a GA nominee, looking to get it to FA eventually. Please pay special attention to referencing and sources, they seem to be the biggest obstacle. -Ed!^(talk) 01:58, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Abraham, B.S.

Just a few minor points that stick out:

All dates should be delinked.
- Done. —Ed!^(talk) 02:18, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Endashes are required in date ranges used in the article, and page ranges used in citations.
- Done. —Ed!^(talk) 02:18, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Level headings should not begin with "The" per MoS.
- Done. —Ed!^(talk) 02:18, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure how those listed as "Notable commanders" in the infobox have been ordered, but I think it would be preferable if the were ordered chronologically by the first of those men to command the corps down to the most current of them.
- Done. —Ed!^(talk) 02:40, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The "References" section should probably be renamed "Notes", and "Sources" to "References".

Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 05:55, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Patar knight

I just skimmed the article, but I did pick up some things:

In the Korean War section, only two engagements are wiki-linked (Inchon landings & Operation Ripper)
- Done. —Ed!^(talk) 02:40, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
In the Cold War section, you wrote: "The eastern half of the border was handled by the South Korean Army while I Corps took charge in the east.[30]" Is the 2nd east supposed to be "west"? Or were they in command of the South Korean Army in the east? This should be fixed or clarified.
- Done. —Ed!^(talk) 02:40, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Honours section should be cited
- Done. —Ed!^(talk) 02:40, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

--Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 14:24, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gaia Octavia Agrippa

Just a few things:

There are a lot of identical links in some sections, this need to be sorted out
Years could be added to the notable commanders in the infobox to make things clearer
- Done. —Ed!^(talk) 02:40, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The image that shows the structure of the Corps is not clear. It needs to be made bigger or moved.
The history section is very large, it may need trimming down a bit.

Gaia Octavia Agrippa^Talk |_Sign 15:20, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]