Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2016/June
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
Proposals, June 2016
Retool {{Mil-philres-stub}}
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was create.
Don't know if this should go to WP:TFD. I came across it while checking redlinked stub code; it feeds into Category:Military unit and formation stubs but isn't big enough for its own category yet. My guess is that it should be re-formed as {{Philippines-mil-unit-stub}}. Any other ideas? Her Pegship (talk) 19:35, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- that category could do with some thinning, but the name of the template is horrible! Yeah, your suggested name sounds good. Grutness...wha? 14:44, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was create.
{{US-mil-unit-stub}} is at 61, speedy? Her Pegship (talk) 19:32, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- Cretainly. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 03:29, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories for upmerged India geography stubs
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was create.
S1 speedy creation proposing:
- Category:Adilabad district geography stubs for {{Adilabad-geo-stub}} - 69 pages
- Category:Hyderabad district geography stubs for {{Hyderabad-geo-stub}} - 75 pages
- Category:Khammam district geography stubs for {{Khammam-geo-stub}} - 69 pages
- Category:Kurnool district geography stubs for {{Kurnool-geo-stub}} - 68 pages
- Category:Nellore district geography stubs for {{Nellore-geo-stub}} - 66 pages
- Category:Warangal district geography stubs for {{Warangal-geo-stub}} - 67 pages
– Nocowardsoulismine (talk) 17:42, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support all of them based on these numbers. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:40, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories for upmerged India university stubs
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was create.
S1 Speedy creation proposals:
- Category:Kerala university stubs for {{Kerala-university-stub}} - 83 pages
- Category:Rajasthan university stubs for {{Rajasthan-university-stub}} - 64 pages
- Category:Uttar Pradesh university stubs for {{UttarPradesh-university-stub}} - 114 pages
Nocowardsoulismine (talk) 14:57, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
- Since it's been 5 days without objection, I went ahead and created the categories. Nocowardsoulismine (talk) 01:19, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.