Wikipedia:WikiProject Tree of Life/Cladogram requests/Archive 8
This is an archive of past discussions about Wikipedia:WikiProject Tree of Life. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
Does anyone have a cladogram from the recent redescription of Cumnoria? Miracusaurs (talk) 01:02, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- Pinging Trilletrollet and SlvrHwk. I want to add it to the page. Miracusaurs (talk) 02:34, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- If you can get me a picture, I'll do it. I don't have access. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 05:10, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- Here is the relevant figure: [1] -SlvrHwk (talk) 05:30, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- I had an opportunity to do it, so here it is: Cougroyalty (talk) 17:42, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- Here is the relevant figure: [1] -SlvrHwk (talk) 05:30, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- If you can get me a picture, I'll do it. I don't have access. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 05:10, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'll add it to the page. Miracusaurs (talk) 01:04, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Isoxyida
Can anyone do a cladogram for the Isoxyida page?. This cladogram seems to work https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Interpretative-cladogram-based-on-a-consensus-tree-from-a-Bayesian-analysis-using-a_fig7_337226782. Fossiladder13 (talk) 18:13, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- On it. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 18:22, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- Let me know if you want this more or less collapsed. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 18:32, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Lythronaxargestes It looks good to me, Thank you!. Fossiladder13 (talk) 03:50, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
| ||||||||||
Stem Ruminantia + Crown Ruminantia
Hello, can I have two cladograms created from the 50% majority consensus tree and the strict consensus tree as seen on page 13 of this 2015 article?: Mosaicomeryx gen. nov., a ruminant mammal from the Oligocene of Europe and the significance of ‘gelocids’ I'll need it for articles on Paleogene ruminants including a draft of Bachitherium that I'm working on. I would also like to see group labels as seen on both cladograms (i.e. "Gelocidae" and the larger "Stem Ruminantia," ending with the Gelocidae where "Crown Rumantia" begins on the Tragulidae). Thanks! PrimalMustelid (talk) 16:26, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- @PrimalMustelid: will do soon —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 16:43, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- @PrimalMustelid: Wasn't sure what to do with Pseudomeryx in the second cladogram. Should it be labelled as a stem-pecoran or not? the figures in the paper are badly designed and ambiguous —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 17:41, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- Although its status within the phylogeny of Ruminantia is not quite stable, Bachitherium is definitely belongs to Tragulina rather than Pecora, so as the text states, the Stem Pecora group in the cladograms begin with Gobiomeryx and end with Dremotherium in the first or Pseudomeryx in the second. Not really sure what to make of Pseudomeryx, though, maybe leave it unlabelled?
- I have a slight change of plans, so I do apologize for having to request a third cladogram: I saw that a 2021 source "New remains of Nalamaeryx (Tragulidae, Mammalia) from the Ladakh Himalaya and their phylogenetical and palaeoenvironmental implications" made an updated version of the cladogram from 2015 [2] removing "stem pecorans" and "crown pecorans," so this should be easier to interpret. Oh, and also in case you're wondering, D. feignouxi and D. guthi belong to Dremotherium while A. elegans and A. quercyi belong to Amphitragulus. PrimalMustelid (talk) 18:23, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- @PrimalMustelid: done —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 18:49, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- Looks good, thanks! PrimalMustelid (talk) 19:00, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- @PrimalMustelid: done —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 18:49, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- @PrimalMustelid: Wasn't sure what to do with Pseudomeryx in the second cladogram. Should it be labelled as a stem-pecoran or not? the figures in the paper are badly designed and ambiguous —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 17:41, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Paleogene Artiodactyls
Hello again, may I have a phylogenetic cladogram of the Paleogene artiodactyls from figure 4 of the article "A new Cainotherioidea (Mammalia, Artiodactyla) from Palembert (Quercy, SW France): Phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary history of the dental pattern of Cainotheriidae?" I am planning on using it for the page Anoplotherium and possibly other pages about Paleogene artiodactyls if I ever get to them. I need all of the genera that were included in the research's cladogram to be included here as well. Thanks in advance! PrimalMustelid (talk) 15:37, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- There is also some alternate cladograms that include Anoplotherium plus Diplobune and Dacrytherium, both of which are considered anoplotheriids. There are the 50% majority consensus, strict consensus, and maximum likelihood consensus trees. They mainly focus on the anthracotheres though, so the cladograms are longer because of them. If necessary, separate the non-anthracotheres (black color) from the anthracotheres (blue color). PrimalMustelid (talk) 15:46, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- Do you want all three of those trees? Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 17:37, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- I'll just take a strict consensus tree and maximum-likelihood tree, thanks! PrimalMustelid (talk) 18:00, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- Do you want all three of those trees? Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 17:37, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- I'll take this one. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 17:16, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- One down. That's a lotta redlinks... Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 17:36, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- Pretty much a common problem with Wikipedia lacking Cenozoic fossil specialists unfortunately (not much casual interest in the Paleogene and to some extent the Neogene and early Quaternary). Might need to become a Cenozoic artiodactyl specialist at this rate, been looking to do either the cainotherioids or tragulids after after working on some anoplotheriids. PrimalMustelid (talk) 18:03, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- Strict consensus done. Up to you if you want to split anthracotheres. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 18:51, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- And here's maximum likelihood. I think this is right but haven't checked it carefully (it was a copy-paste job from the other one). Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 21:18, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- All look good to me, thanks! PrimalMustelid (talk) 22:29, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
Addition to Mimodactylus cladogram
While expanding the Mimodactylus article, I realised the cladogram (added below as is) might need more context. Per this[3] figure, could the cladogram instead branch from Pteranodontoidea, with Pteranodontia added (without subclades) to the base of the current cladogram, and Ornithocheirae as more derived (without subclades), with the two genera Ikranodraco and Lonchodraco in between? FunkMonk (talk) 11:50, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- Is the above as what you want? — Jts1882 | talk 14:14, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- That doesn't look right. I've taken the liberty of expanding it. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 14:18, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, that was incomplete. I missed the second part of the request and edit conflicted with your addition. — Jts1882 | talk
- Thanks, guys, that's it! FunkMonk (talk) 18:19, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, that was incomplete. I missed the second part of the request and edit conflicted with your addition. — Jts1882 | talk
- That doesn't look right. I've taken the liberty of expanding it. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 14:18, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Amphicticeps and stuff
Hello, I'd like to request that Figure 17 in this paper be made into a cladogram usable for Wikipedia. I intend to use it on the Amphicticeps page, maybe also the pages of some other taxa in the tree. Preferably with all the taxa and the groups labelled, thanks! Olmagon (talk) 21:36, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Olmagon: I can do that, just wait a moment. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 21:47, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Olmagon: I hope this is fine. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 22:12, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, started using it. Olmagon (talk) 22:25, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Olmagon: I hope this is fine. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 22:12, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Bears and stuff
Hello, can somebody please make figure 82 of this paper (it's the Eoarctos description) into a cladogram usable on wiki? Preferably with all the group named and branches present (I realize that's a massive tree but I can simplify it on each page I use it to match what suits each page best). Thanks in advance to whoever does this. Olmagon (talk) 21:35, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks so much, you've been a great help. Olmagon (talk) 11:39, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Rhinoceros cladogram
I can a request that the bayesian phylogeny from "Reassessing the phylogeny of Quaternary Eurasian Rhinocerotidae" (fig 2) be coded up? Fig 2 specifically because its phylogeny alligns with that found in genetic studies. Thanks. Hemiauchenia (talk) 19:33, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- I can do that, just wait a little moment —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 19:38, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- Template:Ping Done. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 20:02, 10 October 2023 (UTC)