Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Assessment/A-Class review/Washington State Route 527

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was Withdrawn by nominator. --Rschen7754 (T C) 07:41, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Washington State Route 527 (0 net support votes)

Suggestion: Promote to A-Class

Nominator's comments: This is another Washington GA that has potential for FA. This highway has a longer history than SR 531, and may be FACed in 2009. Comments?

Nominated by: ~~ This page was edited by ĈĠ 00:58, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Considering that this article made it to GA by the mercies of a copyeditor, this is a bad idea. --Rschen7754 (T C) 06:54, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Just taking a look through, the article is a mess. If you don't take the time to clean the article up *without* dumping the work on somebody else, then I don't see why I have to take the time to review it. This is insulting. --Rschen7754 (T C) 11:05, 19 October 2008 (UTC) I don't think this should be promoted, but this isn't exactly actionable. --Rschen7754 (T C) 02:02, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments Close, could use a couple of tweaks

The first mentions of I-405, SR 524, SR 96, I-5, SR 99, SR 526 should be linked and not abbriviated.
"expanding the SR 527/SR 96 intersection dramatically" the word dramatically sounds too, well dramatic, for a road article. Perhaps find a word that isn't as strong?

Dave (talk) 04:48, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw this nomination. ~~ C o m p u t e r G u y 21:24, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.