Wikipedia:WikiProject United States Public Policy/Assessment/DQ

DQ PPI Assessment Page

edit

DQ - Wikipedia expert

Assessment 1, part 1

edit

The purpose of this evaluation in not to gauge variability in article quality, but to look at the metric itself. How consistent is this assessment tool? and Is there a difference in scores between subject area expert assessment and Wikipedian article assessment?

James Q Wilson (1 July 2010)

edit
  • Link to Revision before 1st of July: [1]
  • Comprehensiveness: 3
  • Sourcing: 1
  • Neutrality: 2
  • Readability: 2
  • Illustrations: 0
  • Formatting: 1
  • Total: 9
  • Link to Revision before 1st of July: [2]
  • Comprehensiveness: 7
  • Sourcing: 3
  • Neutrality: 2
  • Readability: 2
  • Illustrations: 1
  • Formatting: 1
  • Total: 16
  • Link to revision: [3]
  • Comprehensiveness: 4
  • Sourcing: 2
  • Neutrality: 1
  • Readability: 2
  • Illustrations: 0
  • Formatting: 0
  • Total: 9

  Working Huge Article. -- DQ (t) (e) 02:47, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comprehensiveness
  • Sourcing
  • Neutrality
  • Readability
  • Illustrations
  • Formatting
  • Total

War on Drugs (1 July 2010)

edit

  Highly Edited Article

  • Comprehensiveness
  • Sourcing
  • Neutrality
  • Readability
  • Illustrations
  • Formatting
  • Total

State school (1 July 2010)

edit

  Working Huge Article. -- DQ (t) (e) 02:47, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comprehensiveness
  • Sourcing
  • Neutrality
  • Readability
  • Illustrations
  • Formatting
  • Total


Assessment 1, Part 2

edit

Assessment request 2, please use article version from 1 October 2010. There are a couple of rereviews, hopefully those will go fast for you. This set will tie up the first assessment, which tests the quantitative metric and compares Wikipedian assessment to expert assessment.

edit
  • Comprehensiveness
  • Sourcing
  • Neutrality
  • Readability
  • Illustrations
  • Formatting
  • Total
edit
  • Comprehensiveness
  • Sourcing
  • Neutrality
  • Readability
  • Illustrations
  • Formatting
  • Total
edit
  • Comprehensiveness
  • Sourcing
  • Neutrality
  • Readability
  • Illustrations
  • Formatting
  • Total
edit
  • Comprehensiveness
  • Sourcing
  • Neutrality
  • Readability
  • Illustrations
  • Formatting
  • Total
edit
  • Comprehensiveness
  • Sourcing
  • Neutrality
  • Readability
  • Illustrations
  • Formatting
  • Total
edit
  • Comprehensiveness
  • Sourcing
  • Neutrality
  • Readability
  • Illustrations
  • Formatting
  • Total
edit
  • Comprehensiveness
  • Sourcing
  • Neutrality
  • Readability
  • Illustrations
  • Formatting
  • Total