Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States Public Policy/Assessment/Student Post Assessment

< Wikipedia:WikiProject United States Public Policy | Assessment

This group of assessments is to establish whether students improved the quality of articles on Wikipedia throughout the semester. Each version linked here is to the version after the student worked on it.

  • Again, please use the quantitative metric described on the Assessment page.
  • Ideally, there will be 5-6 assessments for each article on this list, which means that each team member will assess approximately 12 articles. As some of these are quite short, please assess more than 10 if you can.
  • If possible, please assess the requested articles within 2 weeks, we are hoping to present these results in January, so if possible please do your assessments by 5 January 2011.
  • For this assessment, please assess as many and whichever articles you choose from the list below. You can assess the same article as from the Student Pre Assessment to look for improvement, or you can choose different articles. Each article needs at 3-5 assessments and each reviewer will assess approximately 10 articles, but you all know Amy is a data nerd and would love more data if you are motivated.
  • The articles links below all link to the version immediately after students' activity.
  • If all of the assessments have been completed, please choose a different article to assess.
  • Please add "(done)" in the header of a review once it's been done so other reviewers can easily see what still needs to be worked on from the TOC.


Alaska Ballot Measure 2 (1998)

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Ronk01 (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 02:47, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 9

Sourcing 5.5

Neutrality 2.5

Readability 2

Formatting 2

Illustrations 1

Total 22

Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer:JayJasper (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 14:25, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 9/10

Sourcing 5/6

Neutrality 2/3

Readability 3/3

Formatting 2/2

Illustrations 1/2

Total 22/26

Reviewer 3 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Mabeenot (talk)

Assessment date: 01:11, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 8/10

Sourcing: 3/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 1/2

Total: 17/26

Reviewer 4 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Bejinhan (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 13:13, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 6/10

Sourcing 5/6

Neutrality 1/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 1/2

Total 16/26

Reviewer 5 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 15:14, Tuesday January 4, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 5/10

Sourcing: 3/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 0/2

Total: 13/26

Cyber ShockWave

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: JayJasper (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 14:39, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 7/10

Sourcing 6/6

Neutrality 2/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 2/2

Total 20/26


Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Mabeenot (talk)

Assessment date: 01:16, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 5/10

Sourcing: 4/6

Neutrality: 1/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 2/2

Total: 15/26

Reviewer 3 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Cordless Larry (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 12:42, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 4/10

Sourcing 5/6

Neutrality 1/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 2/2

Total 15/26

Reviewer 4 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Bejinhan (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 13:15, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 7/10

Sourcing 5/6

Neutrality 2/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 2/2

Illustrations 1/2

Total 19/26

Reviewer 5 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 15:13, Tuesday January 4, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 5/10

Sourcing: 2/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 2/2

Total: 14/26

Food Quality Protection Act

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: JayJasper (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 14:49, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 9/10

Sourcing 5/6

Neutrality 3/3

Readability 3/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 2/2

Total 23/26


Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Mabeenot (talk)

Assessment date: 01:20, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 9/10

Sourcing: 6/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 3/3

Formatting: 2/2

Illustrations: 2/2

Total: 24/26

Reviewer 3 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Cordless Larry (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 12:48, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 7/10

Sourcing 5/6

Neutrality 2/3

Readability 3/3

Formatting 2/2

Illustrations 2/2

Total 21/26

Reviewer 4 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Bejinhan (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 13:19, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 5/10

Sourcing 2/6

Neutrality 1/3

Readability 1/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 1/2

Total 11/26

Reviewer 5 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 15:11, Tuesday January 4, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 5/10

Sourcing: 3/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 1/2

Total: 14/26

Fair Sentencing Act

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: JayJasper (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 18:45, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 9/10

Sourcing 5/6

Neutrality 2/3

Readability 3/3

Formatting 2/2

Illustrations 2/2

Total 23/26

Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Bejinhan (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 13:22, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 7/10

Sourcing 2/6

Neutrality 2/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 1/2

Total 15/26

Reviewer 3 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 12:57, Sunday January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 6/10

Sourcing: 3/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 1/2

Total: 15/26

Reviewer 4 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Cordless Larry (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 15:03, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 7/10

Sourcing 4/6

Neutrality 2/3

Readability 3/3

Formatting 2/2

Illustrations 1/2

Total 19/26

Reviewer 5 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Ronk01

Assessment date: 14:38, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 7/10

Sourcing 4/6

Neutrality 2/3

Readability 2.5/3

Formatting 1.5/2

Illustrations 1/2

Total 18/26

Homeland Security Act

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: JayJasper (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 18:55, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 8/10

Sourcing 4/6

Neutrality 2/3

Readability 3/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 2/2

Total 20/26


Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Bejinhan (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 13:24, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 7/10

Sourcing 3/6

Neutrality 2/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 1/2

Total 16/26

Reviewer 3 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 12:56, Sunday January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 5/10

Sourcing: 2/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 2/2

Total: 14/26

Reviewer 4 (done)

edit

Reviewer: CasualObserver'48 (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 11:07, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 7/10

Sourcing: 3/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 1/2

Total: 16/26

Reviewer 5

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total

California Voting Rights Act

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: /ƒETCHCOMMS/

Assessment date: /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 03:26, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Scores

Comprehensiveness 8/10

Sourcing 6/6

Neutrality 3/3

Readability 3/3

Formatting 2/2

Illustrations 2/2

Total 24/26

Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: JayJasper (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 19:13, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 8/10

Sourcing 5/6

Neutrality 3/3

Readability 3/3

Formatting 2/2

Illustrations 2/2

Total 23/26

Reviewer 3 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Bejinhan (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 13:26, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 8/10

Sourcing 5/6

Neutrality 2/3

Readability 3/3

Formatting 2/2

Illustrations 1/2

Total 21/26

Reviewer 4 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Cordless Larry (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 15:07, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 6/10

Sourcing 5/6

Neutrality 2/3

Readability 3/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 1/2

Total 18/26

Reviewer 5 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 15:08, Tuesday January 4, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 5/10

Sourcing: 3/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 1/2

Total: 14/26

John Gilbert Winant

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 18:14, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 6/10

Sourcing 4/6

Neutrality 2/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 2/2

Illustrations 0/2

Total 16/26

Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: JayJasper (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 19:02, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 6/10

Sourcing 4/6

Neutrality 2/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 0/2

Total 15/26

Reviewer 3 (done)

edit

Reviewer: CasualObserver'48 (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 01:47, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 7/10

Sourcing: 4/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 1/2

Total: 17/26

Reviewer 4 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Bejinhan (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 13:28, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 6/10

Sourcing 3/6

Neutrality 2/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 0/2

Total 14/26

Reviewer 5 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 15:07, Tuesday January 4, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 5/10

Sourcing: 2/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 0/2

Total: 12/26

Absentee ballot

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: /ƒETCHCOMMS/

Assessment date: 03:06, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 9/10

Sourcing 3/6

Neutrality 2/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 2/2

Illustrations 1/2

Total 19/26

Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 22:04, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 5/10

Sourcing 2/6

Neutrality 3/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 1/2

Total 14/26

Reviewer 3 (done)

edit

Reviewer: JayJasper (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 20:02, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 7/10

Sourcing 3/6

Neutrality 2/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 1/2

Total 16/26

Reviewer 4 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Bejinhan (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 12:07, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 3/10

Sourcing 2/6

Neutrality 1/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 1/2

Total 10/26

Reviewer 5 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 15:06, Tuesday January 4, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 5/10

Sourcing: 3/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 2/2

Total: 15/26

Public diplomacy

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: /ƒETCHCOMMS/

Assessment date: /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 03:21, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Scores

Comprehensiveness 7/10

Sourcing 4/6

Neutrality 1/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 0/2

Total 15/26

Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: JayJasper (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 19:51, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 6/10

Sourcing 4/6

Neutrality 2/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 0/2

Total 15/26

Reviewer 3 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Mabeenot (talk)

Assessment date: 01:49, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 3/10

Sourcing: 3/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 1/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 0/2

Total: 10/26

Reviewer 4 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Bejinhan (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 12:09, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 6/10

Sourcing 4/6

Neutrality 2/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 2/2

Illustrations 0/2

Total 16/26

Reviewer 5 (done)

edit

Reviewer: CasualObserver'48 (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 04:12, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 6/10

Sourcing: 3/6

Neutrality: 1/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 0/2

Total: 13/26

Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: JayJasper (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 20:14, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 8/10

Sourcing 3/6

Neutrality 1/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 1/2

Total 16/26


Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Bejinhan (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 12:11, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 8/10

Sourcing 3/6

Neutrality 2/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 1/2

Total 17/26

Reviewer 3 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 12:54, Sunday January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 6/10

Sourcing: 3/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 1/2

Total: 15/26

Reviewer 4

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 5

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total

Carbon emissions reporting

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 17:56, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 3/10

Sourcing 1/6

Neutrality 0/3

Readability 1/3

Formatting 2/2

Illustrations 1/2

Total 8/26

Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: JayJasper (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 19:44, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 5/10

Sourcing 2/6

Neutrality 0/3

Readability 1/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 1/2

Total 10/26

Reviewer 3 (done)

edit

Reviewer: CasualObserver'48 (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 01:11, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 5/10

Sourcing: 3/6

Neutrality: 0/3

Readability: 1/3

Formatting: 0/2

Illustrations: 2/2

Total: 11/26

Reviewer 4 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 12:50, Sunday January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 5/10

Sourcing: 3/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 1/2

Total: 14/26

Reviewer 5

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Negawatt power

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: JayJasper (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 19:54, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 3/10

Sourcing 4/6

Neutrality 0/3

Readability 1/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 0/2

Total 9/26


Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Bejinhan (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 12:14, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 6/10

Sourcing 3/6

Neutrality 2/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 0/2

Total 14/26

Reviewer 3 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 12:49, Sunday January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 5/10

Sourcing: 3/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 0/2

Total: 13/26

Reviewer 4 (done)

edit

Reviewer: CasualObserver'48 (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 08:51, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 5/10

Sourcing: 3/6

Neutrality: 1/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 0/2

Total: 12/26

Reviewer 5

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total

Community wind energy

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: /ƒETCHCOMMS/

Assessment date: 02:40, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 9/10

Sourcing 5/6

Neutrality 2/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 0/2

Total 19/26

Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: JayJasper (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 20:12, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 8/10

Sourcing 5/6

Neutrality 2/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 0/2

Total 18/26

Reviewer 3 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 12:46, Sunday January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 4/10

Sourcing: 3/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 1/2

Total: 13/26

Reviewer 4

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 5

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Power Purchase Agreement

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Mabeenot (talk)

Assessment date: 02:18, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 7/10

Sourcing: 2/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 0/2

Total: 14/26

Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: CasualObserver'48 (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 09:13, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 4/10

Sourcing: 3/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 0/2

Total: 12/26

Reviewer 3 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 12:45, Sunday January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 5/10

Sourcing: 3/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 0/2

Total: 13/26

Reviewer 4

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 5

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Energy demand management

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: CasualObserver'48 (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 04:44, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 4/10

Sourcing: 2/6

Neutrality: 1/3

Readability: 1/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 0/2

Total: 9/26

Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 12:43, Sunday January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 3/10

Sourcing: 1/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 0/2

Total: 9/26

Reviewer 3

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 4

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 5

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Energy security

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Mabeenot (talk)

Assessment date: 02:25, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 3/10

Sourcing: 2/6

Neutrality: 1/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 0/2

Illustrations: 1/2

Total: 9/26

Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: CasualObserver'48 (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 13:21, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 3/10

Sourcing: 3/6

Neutrality: 0/3

Readability: 1/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 1/2

Total: 9/26

Reviewer 3 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 14:06, Sunday January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 5/10

Sourcing: 3/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 1/2

Total: 14/26

Reviewer 4

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 5

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Nationalization of oil supplies

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 20:52, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 8/10

Sourcing 5/6

Neutrality 3/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 0/2

Total 19/26

Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 14:07, Sunday January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 6/10

Sourcing: 3/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 0/2

Total: 14/26

Reviewer 3 (done)

edit

Reviewer: CasualObserver'48 (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 01:55, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 8/10

Sourcing: 4/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 0/2

Total: 17/26

Reviewer 4

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 5

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Workforce Innovation in Regional Economic Development

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 21:01, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 7/10

Sourcing 1/6

Neutrality 1/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 0/2

Total 12/26

Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 14:09, Sunday January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 5/10

Sourcing: 2/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 0/2

Total: 12/26

Reviewer 3

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 4

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 5

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Economy of Pittsburgh

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: /ƒETCHCOMMS/

Assessment date: 03:02, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 9/10

Sourcing 5/6

Neutrality 2/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 2/2

Illustrations 2/2

Total 22/26

Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 14:11, Sunday January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 6/10

Sourcing: 3/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 1/2

Total: 15/26

Reviewer 3

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 4

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 5

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Arctic policy of the United States

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: /ƒETCHCOMMS/

Assessment date: 02:53, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 8/10

Sourcing 4/6

Neutrality 1/3

Readability 1/3

Formatting 0/2

Illustrations 0/2

Total 14/26

Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 14:12, Sunday January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 7/10

Sourcing: 3/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 1/2

Total: 16/26

Reviewer 3

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 4

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 5

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Computer Associates Int. Inc. v. Altai Inc.

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Bejinhan (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 12:16, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 4/10

Sourcing 1/6

Neutrality 1/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 0/2

Total 9/26

Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 14:14, Sunday January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 6/10

Sourcing: 1/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 0/2

Total: 12/26

Reviewer 3

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 4

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 5

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc.

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer:JayJasper (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 04:33 29 December 2010

Scores

Comprehensiveness 9/10

Sourcing 4/6

Neutrality 2/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 2/2

Illustrations 0/2

Total 19/26


Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 14:40, Sunday January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 5/10

Sourcing: 3/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 0/2

Total: 13/26

Reviewer 3

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 4

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 5

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total

Visual Artists Rights Act

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: /ƒETCHCOMMS/

Assessment date: 03:17, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 3/10

Sourcing 1/6

Neutrality 2/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 0/2

Total 9/26

Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 14:48, Sunday January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 3/10

Sourcing: 2/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 0/2

Total: 10/26

Reviewer 3

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 4

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 5

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total



De-Ba'athification

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: /ƒETCHCOMMS/

Assessment date: 03:11, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 10/10

Sourcing 6/6

Neutrality 2/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 2/2

Illustrations 0/2

Total 22/26

Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Mabeenot (talk)

Assessment date: 01:33, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 10/10

Sourcing: 6/6

Neutrality: 3/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 0/2

Total: 22/26

Reviewer 3 (done)

edit

Reviewer: CasualObserver'48 (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 09:18, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 8/10

Sourcing: 5/6

Neutrality: 3/3

Readability: 3/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 1/2

Total: 21/26

Reviewer 4 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 14:59, Tuesday January 4, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 7/10

Sourcing: 5/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 1/2

Total: 18/26

Reviewer 5

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total

United States security assistance to the Palestinian Authority

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: CasualObserver'48 (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 04:51, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 6/10

Sourcing: 4/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 1/2

Total: 16/26

Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 11:10, Sunday January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 7/10

Sourcing: 4/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 1/2

Total: 17/26

Reviewer 3

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 4

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 5

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Arab immigration to the United States

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 18:28, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 6/10

Sourcing 5/6

Neutrality 2/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 1/2

Total 17/26

Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: CasualObserver'48 (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 01:50, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 6/10

Sourcing: 4/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 1/2

Total: 16/26

Reviewer 3 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 11:09, Sunday January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 6/10

Sourcing: 4/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 1/2

Total: 16/26

Reviewer 4

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 5

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total

Massachusetts Development Finance Agency

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 19:44, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 3/10

Sourcing 3/6

Neutrality 1/3

Readability 1/3

Formatting 2/2

Illustrations 0/2

Total 10/26

Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 11:07, Sunday January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 5/10

Sourcing: 4/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 0/2

Total: 14/26

Reviewer 3

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 4

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 5

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Five-Star Quality Rating System for Medicare Advantage Plans

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: /ƒETCHCOMMS/

Assessment date: 03:12, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 2/10

Sourcing 0/6

Neutrality 1/3

Readability 1/3

Formatting 0/2

Illustrations 0/2

Total 4/26

Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Cordless Larry (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 15:31, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 2/10

Sourcing 0/6

Neutrality 0/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 0/2

Illustrations 0/2

Total 4/26

Reviewer 3 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 10:55, Sunday January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 2/10

Sourcing: 0/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 1/3

Formatting: 0/2

Illustrations: 0/2

Total: 5/26

Reviewer 4

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 5

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total

Office of Special Education Programs

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: /ƒETCHCOMMS/

Assessment date: 03:15, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 4/10

Sourcing 3/6

Neutrality 2/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 1/2

Total 13/26

Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 10:24, Sunday January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 4/10

Sourcing: 2/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 1/2

Total: 12/26

Reviewer 3 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 03:45, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 3/10

Sourcing 2/6

Neutrality 3/3

Readability 1/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 1/2

Total 11/26

Reviewer 4

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 5

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total

Asset Marketing Systems, Inc. v. Gagnon

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 10:23, Sunday January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 6/10

Sourcing: 2/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 0/2

Total: 13/26

Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Cordless Larry (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 15:58, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 6/10

Sourcing 3/6

Neutrality 2/3

Readability 1/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 1/2

Total 14/26

Reviewer 3 (done)

edit

Reviewer: {{user|Mike Christie

Assessment date: 03:36, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 7/10

Sourcing 5/6

Neutrality 3/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 2/2

Illustrations 0/2

Total 19/26

Reviewer 4

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 5

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total

Adobe Systems, Inc. v. Southern Software, Inc.

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 10:22, Sunday January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 6/10

Sourcing: 3/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 1/2

Total: 15/26

Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Bejinhan (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 09:37, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 4/10

Sourcing 3/6

Neutrality 1/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 1/2

Total 12/26

Reviewer 3 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 03:24, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 7/10

Sourcing 3/6

Neutrality 3/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 1/2

Total 17/26

Reviewer 4

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 5

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total

Lane v. Facebook, Inc.

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: JayJasper (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 04:00, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 6/10

Sourcing 4/6

Neutrality 1/3

Readability 1/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 0/2

Total 13/26

Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 10:06, Sunday January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 5/10

Sourcing: 3/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 0/2

Total: 13/26

Reviewer 3 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 03:13, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 7/10

Sourcing 4/6

Neutrality 1/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 2/2

Illustrations 0/2

Total 16/26

Reviewer 4

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 5

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total

Microsoft Corp. v. DAK Industries, Inc.

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 18:46, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 7/10

Sourcing 6/6

Neutrality 3/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 2/2

Illustrations 1/2

Total 21/26

Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 09:42, Sunday January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 5/10

Sourcing: 2/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 0/2

Total: 12/26

Reviewer 3

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 4

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 5

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total

Micro Star v. FormGen Inc.

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 21:15, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 7/10

Sourcing 6/6

Neutrality 3/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 2/2

Illustrations 0/2

Total 20/26

Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 09:40, Sunday January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 6/10

Sourcing: 3/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 2/2

Illustrations: 0/2

Total: 15/26

Reviewer 3

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 4

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 5

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total

Specht v. Netscape Communications Corp.

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 09:38, Sunday January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 4/10

Sourcing: 2/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 0/2

Total: 12/26

Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 02:20, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 6/10

Sourcing 5/6

Neutrality 2/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 0/2

Total 16/26

Reviewer 3

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 4

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 5

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total

RealNetworks, Inc. v. DVD Copy Control Association, Inc.

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 09:25, Sunday January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 6/10

Sourcing: 3/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 0/2

Total: 14/26

Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 02:34, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 8/10

Sourcing 6/6

Neutrality 2/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 2/2

Illustrations 0/2

Total 20/26

Reviewer 3

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 4

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 5

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total

Viacom International Inc. v. YouTube, Inc.

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 09:24, Sunday January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 5/10

Sourcing: 3/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 0/2

Total: 13/26

Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: CasualObserver'48 (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 01:46, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 7/10

Sourcing: 5/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 1/2

Total: 18/26

Reviewer 3 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 03:05, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 6/10

Sourcing 4/6

Neutrality 1/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 2/2

Illustrations 0/2

Total 15/26

Reviewer 4

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 5

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total

1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. WhenU.com, Inc.

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 09:22, Sunday January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 5/10

Sourcing: 2/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 0/2

Total: 12/26

Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Cordless Larry (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 15:43, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 4/10

Sourcing 2/6

Neutrality 1/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 1/2

Total 11/26

Reviewer 3 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 02:54, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 5/10

Sourcing 3/6

Neutrality 3/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 2/2

Illustrations 0/2

Total 15/26

Reviewer 4

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 5

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total

Rescuecom Corp. v. Google Inc.

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: /ƒETCHCOMMS/

Assessment date: 02:44, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 7/10

Sourcing 4/6

Neutrality 3/3

Readability 3/3

Formatting 2/2

Illustrations 1/2

Total 20/26

Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 09:21, Sunday January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 5/10

Sourcing: 3/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 0/2

Total: 13/26

Reviewer 3 (done)

edit

Reviewer: JayJasper (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 22:33, 03 January 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 6/10

Sourcing 4/6

Neutrality 2/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 2/2

Illustrations 0/2

Total 16/26

Reviewer 4

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 5

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total

AT&T Corp. v. Excel Communications, Inc.

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 20:10, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 7/10

Sourcing 5/6

Neutrality 3/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 0/2

Total 18/26

Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 09:16, Sunday January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 6/10

Sourcing: 3/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 0/2

Total: 14/26

Reviewer 3 (done)

edit

Reviewer: JayJasper (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 22:25, 03 January 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 7/10

Sourcing 4/6

Neutrality 2/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 0/2

Total 16/26

Reviewer 4

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 5

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total

Perfect Web Technologies, Inc. v. InfoUSA, Inc.

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 09:15, Sunday January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 6/10

Sourcing: 2/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 0/2

Total: 13/26

Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Cordless Larry (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 15:36, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 5/10

Sourcing 2/6

Neutrality 2/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 1/2

Total 13/26

Reviewer 3 (done)

edit

Reviewer: JayJasper (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 22:15, 3 January, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 5/10

Sourcing 2/6

Neutrality 2/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 0/2

Total 12/26

Reviewer 4

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 5

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total

Fujifilm Corp. v. Benun

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: /ƒETCHCOMMS/

Assessment date: 02:47, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 6/10

Sourcing 3/6

Neutrality 3/3

Readability 3/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 1/2

Total 17/26

Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 19:28, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 6/10

Sourcing 5/6

Neutrality 3/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 0/2

Total 17/26

Reviewer 3 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 09:14, Sunday January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 5/10

Sourcing: 2/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 0/2

Total: 12/26

Reviewer 4 (done)

edit

Reviewer: CasualObserver'48 (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 10:52, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 6/10

Sourcing: 4/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting:1/2

Illustrations: 1/2

Total: 16/26

Reviewer 5

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


National Basketball Association v. Motorola, Inc.

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 19:08, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 6/10

Sourcing 5/6

Neutrality 3/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 0/2

Total 17/26

Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 09:08, Sunday January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 4/10

Sourcing: 1/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 0/2

Total: 10/26

Reviewer 3 (done)

edit

Reviewer: JayJasper (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 15:59, Friday January 21, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 6/10

Sourcing 3/6

Neutrality 2/3

Readability 2/3

Formatting 1/2

Illustrations 0/2

Total 14/26

Reviewer 4

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Reviewer 5

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Sega v. Accolade

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 08:32, Friday January 21, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 4/10

Sourcing: 2/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 1/2

Total: 12/26

Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Bejinhan (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 09:32, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 3/10

Sourcing: 1/6

Neutrality: 1/3

Readability: 1/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 0/2

Total: 7/26

Reviewer 3 (done)

edit

Reviewer: JayJasper (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 15:49, Friday January 21, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 5/10

Sourcing: 2/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 0/2

Total: 12/26

Reviewer 4 (done)

edit

Reviewer: CasualObserver'48 (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 10:12, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 7/10

Sourcing: 4/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 3/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 1/2

Total 18/26

Reviewer 5

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness

Sourcing

Neutrality

Readability

Formatting

Illustrations

Total


Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act

edit

Reviewer 1 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 08:34, Friday January 21, 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 4/10

Sourcing: 1/6

Neutrality: 2/3

Readability: 2/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 0/2

Total: 10/26

Reviewer 2 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Bejinhan (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 09:34, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness: 3/10

Sourcing: 3/6

Neutrality: 1/3

Readability: 1/3

Formatting: 1/2

Illustrations: 0/2

Total: 9/26

Reviewer 3 (done)

edit

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs)

Assessment date: 02:10, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Scores

Comprehensiveness 3/10

Sourcing 1/6

Neutrality 3/3

Readability 1/3

Formatting 2/2

Illustrations 0/2

Total 10/26

Reviewer 4

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness: /10

Sourcing: /6

Neutrality: /3

Readability: /3

Formatting: /2

Illustrations: /2

Total: /26

Reviewer 5

edit

Reviewer:

Assessment date:

Scores

Comprehensiveness /10

Sourcing /6

Neutrality /3

Readability '/3

Formatting /2

Illustrations /2

Total /26

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_United_States_Public_Policy/Assessment/Student_Post_Assessment&oldid=409691194"