Wikipedia:WikiProject Unreferenced articles/Deletion review/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

January 2011

Proposed deletion of National Conservative Unity Party

The article National Conservative Unity Party has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found two minor mentions in published works (gBooks), was unable to verify the article content beyond "it exists", fails WP:N and WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:51, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

• Result = Delete Expired prod JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:49, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

February 2011

Proposed deletion of NEIU Physical Education Complex

The article NEIU Physical Education Complex has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found a few promotional web hits and no published (gbook) WP:RS, fails WP:V and WP:N, Does it exist; yes, are there reliable sources for any of the article content; No

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:52, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Results = Delete Expired prod. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 17:31, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nero prediction

The article Nero prediction has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found a few promotional web hits and no published (gbook) independent references WP:RS, fails WP:V and WP:N, Does it exist; yes, are there independent reliable sources for any of the article content; No

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 17:44, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Results = Delete Expired prod, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 17:31, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of New Leinster Province for deletion

The article New Leinster Province is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Leinster Province until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:19, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

• Result = Keep, I should have searched for "New Leinster" after "New Leinster Province" came up empty. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:47, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of New Music Canada, Vol. 1

The article New Music Canada, Vol. 1 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found promotional references only, no references on article, no mention of notability, fails WP:V and WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:28, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Results = Keep. References added, Notability remains questionable. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 17:35, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of A New Starsystem Has Been Explored

The article A New Starsystem Has Been Explored has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Singles generally do not meet WP:V and WP:N, no mention of notability no references.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:30, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Results = Delete Expired prod, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 17:44, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The New Year (song)

The article The New Year (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Singles generally do not meet WP:V and WP:N, mention of notability was not able to validate with references searched theofficialcharts.com without finding the song.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:41, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Results = Merge & Redirect, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 17:43, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nick's Boogie

The article Nick's Boogie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Singles generally do not meet WP:V and WP:N, no mention of notability no references.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:32, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Results = Delete Expired prod, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 17:47, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dali's Dilemma

The article Dali's Dilemma has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage found in reliable sources to make them notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattg82 (talk) 23:19, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Results = Delete Expired prod, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 17:47, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nilgiri Christian Guest Homes Association

The article Nilgiri Christian Guest Homes Association has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found no published (gBooks) mentions and mostly/only mirrors online. No mention of notability, fails WP:V and WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 17:26, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Results = Keep References added JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 17:48, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of No Vendrá

The article No Vendrá has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Singles generally do not meet WP:V and WP:N, no mention of notability no references.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 17:45, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Results = Delete Expired prod, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16

• 23, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Noisebox Records

The article Noisebox Records has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found two minor published (gBook) mentions, and a few online. Does not seem to meet WP:V or WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 17:52, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

• Results = Keep Multiple References added. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:22, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of 1991 BDO World Darts Championship for deletion

The article 1991 BDO World Darts Championship is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1991 BDO World Darts Championship until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jeepday (talk) 02:14, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Results = Keep References supplied in AfD, and applied to article. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 17:49, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Novita

The article Novita has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found no support in published (gBooks) WP:RS for the content of this article. I did not find novita used in the fashion indicated by the article. Fails WP:V and WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 18:03, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Results = Delete Expired prod JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 17:25, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nyan Wheti

The article Nyan Wheti has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found only mirrors, fails WP:N and WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:09, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Results = Keep, references added. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 17:26, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

March 2011

Proposed deletion of Ocean City Convention Center

The article Ocean City Convention Center has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found the external link just added to this article. I am pretty sure the roland-e-powell-convention-center is not what is being described in this article. I looked around ococean.com and did not find support for this article as written. Fails WP:N and WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 17:13, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Results = Keep, knowledgeable user corected name and moved article, while adding references. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 15:50, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Daisy Ogle

The article Daisy Ogle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

a search for references found no published (gBooks) support for this subject. Fails WP:V and WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 17:21, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Results = Keep Reference found and added. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 15:49, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Omega Gang

The article Omega Gang has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found no published (gBooks) support for the article content or subject. A few blog and fan sites have the subject, no WP:RS found, fails WP:N and WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:32, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Result = Merge and redirect to Quentin Quire#Omega Gang, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 15:28, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of One Day at a Time (Em's Version)

The article One Day at a Time (Em's Version) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find support for the notability claim "charted at #80 on The Billboard Hot 100", fails WP:N and WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 10:52, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Results = Keep added ref supports notability, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 17:40, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Operation Matterhorn (1963)

The article Operation Matterhorn (1963) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found no published (gBook) support for this article. Fails WP:V and WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 15:43, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Result = Delete Expired Prod, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 15:28, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mark Osowski

The article Mark Osowski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found a couple published (gBooks) very minor mentions of the subject. Fails WP:N and WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 15:35, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Results = Keep, obit in USA Today added as references. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 10:52, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Otierre

The article Otierre has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No mention of notability no references, only potential source is a dead link at it:Otierre

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 15:59, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Results = Keep, Reference added, note left on my talk page probably notable based on other articles at itWP. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 10:43, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Our Home Is Gone

The article Our Home Is Gone has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No mention of notability, no references "only about 1000 albums were sold". Fails WP:N and WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:12, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Result = Redirect to Meg & Dia. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:01, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Our Planet

The article Our Planet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found no published (gBooks) mentions of the subject. Is not mentioned at CBeebies, did find several hits online for T.V. guide type listings, but nothing showing WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:24, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Results = Keep, Primary source added as reference, Notability not addressed. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 10:45, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Palilula neighbourhood, Niš

The article Palilula neighbourhood, Niš has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Neighborhoods generally don't meet W:N. No mention of notability no references

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 17:19, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Pending - Possible category Delete, Discussion at User_talk:WhiteWriter#Neighborhoods interested group will attempt to meet WP:V and WP:N.

Proposed deletion of Grupo Desportivo Palmeira

The article Grupo Desportivo Palmeira has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found "Your search - "Grupo Desportivo Palmeira" site:RSSSF.com - did not match any documents". Fails WP:N and WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 17:25, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Results = Keep References found and added JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 15:30, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of 1981–1982 United States network television schedule (Saturday morning) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1981–1982 United States network television schedule (Saturday morning) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1981–1982 United States network television schedule (Saturday morning) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jeepday (talk) 11:44, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Results - Keep, AfD decision. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 15:46, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Penn (Tamil drama)

The article Penn (Tamil drama) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found no published (gBooks) support for the content of this article, fails WP:N and WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 15:24, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Results = Delete Expired prod JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:52, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pentagram (Mezarkabul album)

The article Pentagram (Mezarkabul album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of meeting WP:NALBUMS, a couple of minor mentions in published (gBooks) works found. No references available in the Turkish article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 15:42, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Results = Delete Expired prod JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:53, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of People's Choice Heavyweight Tournament

The article People's Choice Heavyweight Tournament has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found one published (gBooks) minor reference to the fight.Craig Peterson and Burt Cooper are the only mentioned fighters and neither is mentioned in this article. Fails WP:N and WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 10:53, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Results = Delete Expired prod JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:53, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

May 2011

Nomination of The Phrase That Pays for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Phrase That Pays is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Phrase That Pays until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 15:16, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Results = Delete Afd Decision JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 15:12, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pierre Werner Cricket Ground

The article Pierre Werner Cricket Ground has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found no published (gBooks) references to support this article, nor any mentions of the subject. Fails WP:N and WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:00, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

• Results = Keep References added, Notability remains questionable. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 15:30, 27 May 2011 (UTC)