Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/Trent University/Politics and Creativity (Fall)

This Course

Wikipedia Resources

Interactive training

Editing guidelines (PDF)

Help pages (PDF)

More resources

Connect

Other courses

Questions? Ask us:

contactwikiedu.org

Course name: Politics and Creativity

Institution: Trent University

Instructor: Nadine Changfoot

Wikipedia Expert: Shalor (Wiki Ed)

Subject: Political Studies

Course dates: 2017-09-12 00:00:00 UTC – 2017-12-12 23:59:59 UTC

Approximate number of student editors: 10

This course will introduce the relationship between creativity and politics, where creativity is manifest in arts practices. Human beings make things and in that process they are creative. Just think of the things you like to do, especially activities that are labeled “extracurricular” or “hobbies” (e.g. photography, visual art, music making, theatre, dance, collaging, poetry, journaling, etc.). In this class we will explore some of the reasons why and how individuals pursue these activities. This class will reflect upon creativity harnessed for purposes of political and social change. In the latter part of the course, the class will examine the relationship between culture industries and political and social change, and examples of action (e.g., music, visual art, theatre) where creativity and citizenship, more specifically political and social change, intersect. Students will reflect upon “doing politics differently” with the help of examples where political resistance has been expressed through culture.

Student	Assigned	Reviewing
EmmaSG		Food Not Bombs
Alexrush1996		Food Not Bombs
DrezWiki	Food Not Bombs	Food Not Bombs

Timeline

Week 1

Course meetings

Tuesday, 12 September 2017

In class - Introduction to the Wikipedia project

Welcome to your Wikipedia project's course timeline. This page will guide you through the Wikipedia project for your course. Be sure to check with your instructor to see if there are other pages you should be following as well.

This page breaks down writing a Wikipedia article into a series of steps, or milestones. These steps include online trainings to help you get started on Wikipedia.

Your course has also been assigned a Wikipedia Content Expert. Check your Talk page for notes from them. You can also reach them through the "Get Help" button on this page.

To get started, please review the following handouts:

Editing Wikipedia pages 1–5
Evaluating Wikipedia

Assignment - Get started on Wikipedia

Create an account and join this course page, using the enrollment link your instructor sent you. (To avoid hitting Wikipedia's account creation limits, this is best done outside of class. Only 6 new accounts may be created per day from the same IP address.)
It's time to dive into Wikipedia. Below, you'll find the first set of online trainings you'll need to take. New modules will appear on this timeline as you get to new milestones. Be sure to check back and complete them! Incomplete trainings will be reflected in your grade.
When you finish the trainings, practice by introducing yourself to a classmate on that classmate’s Talk page.

Assignment - Wikipedia assignment blog

Begin a blog about your experiences. You can use discussion questions to frame your entries, or reflect on the research and writing process. Create at least one blog entry each week during the Wikipedia assignment. These blogs will help you with the Reflective Essay assignment.

Milestones

This week, everyone should have a Wikipedia account.

Week 2

Course meetings

Tuesday, 19 September 2017

Assignment - Evaluate Wikipedia

It's time to think critically about Wikipedia articles. You'll evaluate a Wikipedia article related to the course and leave suggestions for improving it on the article's Talk page.

Complete the "Evaluating Articles and Sources" training (linked below).
Choose an article on Wikipedia related to your course to read and evaluate. As you read, consider the following questions (but don't feel limited to these) and write answers, submitting them to Nadine via Blackboard.

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

In class - Discussion: What's a content gap?

Now that you're thinking about what makes a "good" Wikipedia article, consider some additional questions.

Wikipedians often talk about "content gaps." What do you think a content gap is, and what are some possible ways to identify them?
What are some reasons a content gap might arise? What are some ways to remedy them?
Does it matter who writes Wikipedia?
What does it mean to be "unbiased" on Wikipedia? How is that different, or similar, to your own definition of "bias"?

Week 3

Course meetings

Tuesday, 26 September 2017

Assignment - Propose 3 edits

Propose 3 edits to the Wikipedia Food Not Bombs article. See assignment on the course Blackboard.

Week 4

Course meetings

Tuesday, 3 October 2017

In class - Discussion: Thinking about sources and plagiarism

Blog posts and press releases are considered poor sources of reliable information. Why?
What are some reasons you might not want to use a company's website as the main source of information about that company?
What is the difference between a copyright violation and plagiarism?
What are some good techniques to avoid close paraphrasing and plagiarism?

Milestones

Make sure everyone in the group is assigned to the same Wikipedia article on the Students tab of this course page.
Select one group member whose Sandbox space you'll all share to draft your article. Each person should link to that shared Sandbox from their own Sandbox page. A sandbox is like any other page on Wikipedia, and anyone can edit it.
Wikipedia doesn't allow multiple people to edit from different devices at the same time. If you're working together in person, one person should add the work to the Sandbox. If you are all working independently, make small edits and save often to avoid "editing conflicts" with classmates. Make sure that you're logged in under your own Wikipedia account while editing in your classmate's sandbox to ensure your edits are recorded.
Don't create a group account for your project. Group accounts are prohibited.

Assignment - Choose your topic / Find your sources

It's time to choose an article and assign it to yourself.

Review page 6 of your Editing Wikipedia guidebook.
Write a few sentences about what you plan to contribute to the selected article.
- Think back to when you did an article critique. What can you add?
- Compile a list of relevant, reliable books, journal articles, or other sources. Post that bibliography to the talk page of the article you'll be working on, and in your sandbox. Make sure to check in on the Talk page to see if anyone has advice on your bibliography.

Week 5

Course meetings

Tuesday, 10 October 2017

Milestones

You've picked a topic and found your sources. Now it's time to start writing.

Editing an article?

Write an edit to a section of an article

Improving an existing article?

Identify what's missing from the current form of the article. Think back to the skills you learned while critiquing an article. Make notes for improvement in your journal that will also support your reflective essay.

Keep reading your sources, too, as you prepare to write the body of the article.

Resources: Editing Wikipedia pages 7–9

Milestones

Everyone has begun writing their article edits.

Week 6

Course meetings

Tuesday, 17 October 2017

In class - Discussion: Thinking about Wikipedia

What do you think of Wikipedia's definition of "neutrality"?
What are the impacts and limits of Wikipedia as a source of information?
On Wikipedia, all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. What kinds of sources does this exclude? Can you think of any problems that might create?
If Wikipedia was written 100 years ago, how might its content (and contributors) be different? What about 100 years from now?

Milestones

Keep working on transforming your article edits for incorporation into the article. Get draft ready for peer-review.
If you'd like a Content Expert to review your draft, now is the time! Click the "Get Help" button in your sandbox to request notes.

Assignment - Peer review and copy edit

First, take the "Peer Review" online training.
Select two classmates’ articles that you will peer review and copyedit. On the Articles tab, find the articles that you want to review. Then in the "My Articles" section of the Home tab, assign them to yourself to review.
Peer review your classmates' drafts. Leave suggestions on on the Talk page of the article, or sandbox, that your fellow student is working on. Other editors may be reviewing your work, so look for their comments! Be sure to acknowledge feedback from other Wikipedians.
As you review, make spelling, grammar, and other adjustments. Pay attention to the tone of the article. Is it encyclopedic?

Milestones

Every student has finished reviewing their assigned articles, making sure that every article has been reviewed.

Week 7

Course meetings

Tuesday, 31 October 2017

Assignment - Respond to your peer or instructor's review

You probably have some feedback from other students and possibly other Wikipedians. It's time to work with that feedback to improve your article!

Read Editing Wikipedia pages 12 and 14.
Return to your draft or article and think about the suggestions. Decide which ones to start implementing. Reach out to your instructor or your Content Expert if you have any questions.

Week 8

Course meetings

Tuesday, 7 November 2017

Assignment - Begin moving your work to Wikipedia

Once you've made improvements to your article based on peer review feedback, it's time to move your work to Wikipedia proper - the "mainspace."

Editing an existing article?

NEVER copy and paste your draft of an article over the entire article. Instead, edit small sections at a time.
Copy your edits into the article. Make many small edits, saving each time, and leaving an edit summary. Never replace more than one to two sentences without saving!
Be sure to copy text from your sandbox while the sandbox page is in 'Edit' or 'Edit source' mode. This ensures that the formatting is transferred correctly.

Creating a new article?

Read Editing Wikipedia page 13, and follow those steps to move your article from your Sandbox to Mainspace.
You can also review the [[../../../training/students/sandboxes|Sandboxes and Mainspace]] online training.

Week 9

Course meetings

Tuesday, 14 November 2017

Assignment - Continue improving your edits

Do additional research and writing to make further improvements to your article, based on suggestions and your own critique.

Read Editing Wikipedia page 12 to see how to create links from your article to others, and from other articles to your own. Try to link to 3–5 articles, and link to your article from 2–3 other articles.
Consider adding an image to your article. Wikipedia has strict rules about what media can be added, so make sure to take the 'Contributing Images and Media Files' training before you upload an image.

Week 10

Course meetings

Tuesday, 21 November 2017

Assignment - Polish your work and Final Edit

Continue to expand and improve your work, and format your edit (addition/revision) to match Wikipedia's tone and standards. Remember to contact your Content Expert at any time if you need further help!

Assignment - Prepare for in-class presentation

Prepare for an in-class presentation about your Wikipedia editing experience.

Week 11

Course meetings

Tuesday, 28 November 2017

In class - In-class presentation Nov 28

Present about your Wikipedia editing experience.

Consider the following questions as you reflect on your Wikipedia assignment/experience:

Critiquing articles: What did you learn about Wikipedia during the article evaluation? How did you approach critiquing the article you selected for this assignment? How did you decide what to add to your chosen article?
Summarizing your contributions: include a summary of your edits and why you felt they were a valuable addition to the article. How does your article compare to earlier versions? What was the process by which you created your contribution (i.e., the main steps you took)?
Peer Review: If your class did peer/instructor review, include information about the peer review process. What did you contribute in your review of your peers article? What did your peers/instructor recommend you change on your article?
Feedback: Did you receive feedback from other Wikipedia editors, and if so, how did you respond to and handle that feedback?
Wikipedia generally: What did you learn from contributing to Wikipedia? How does a Wikipedia assignment compare to other assignments you've done in the past? How can Wikipedia be used to improve public understanding of our field/your topic? Why is this important?

Assignment - Prepare for Reflective Essay

Prepare reflective essay (5 pages) on your Wikipedia contributions.

Consider the following questions as you reflect on your Wikipedia assignment:

Critiquing articles: What did you learn about Wikipedia during the article evaluation? How did you approach critiquing the article you selected for this assignment? How did you decide what to add to your chosen article?
Summarizing your contributions: include a summary of your edits and why you felt they were a valuable addition to the article. How does your article compare to earlier versions? What was the process by which you created your contribution (i.e., the main steps you took)?
Peer Review: If your class did peer/instructor review, include information about the peer review process. What did you contribute in your review of your peers article? What did your peers/instructor recommend you change on your article?
Feedback: Did you receive feedback from other Wikipedia editors, and if so, how did you respond to and handle that feedback?
Wikipedia generally: What did you learn from contributing to Wikipedia? How does a Wikipedia assignment compare to other assignments you've done in the past? How can Wikipedia be used to improve public understanding of our field/your topic? Why is this important?

Week 12

Course meetings

Tuesday, 5 December 2017

Assignment - Reflective Essay

Reflective essay (5 pages) on your Wikipedia contributions due today, Dec 5.

Consider the following questions as you reflect on your Wikipedia assignment:

Critiquing articles: What did you learn about Wikipedia during the article evaluation? How did you approach critiquing the article you selected for this assignment? How did you decide what to add to your chosen article?
Summarizing your contributions: include a summary of your edits and why you felt they were a valuable addition to the article. How does your article compare to earlier versions? What was the process by which you created your contribution (i.e., the main steps you took)?
Peer Review: If your class did peer/instructor review, include information about the peer review process. What did you contribute in your review of your peers article? What did your peers/instructor recommend you change on your article?
Feedback: Did you receive feedback from other Wikipedia editors, and if so, how did you respond to and handle that feedback?
Wikipedia generally: What did you learn from contributing to Wikipedia? How does a Wikipedia assignment compare to other assignments you've done in the past? How can Wikipedia be used to improve public understanding of our field/your topic? Why is this important?

Week 13

Course meetings

Tuesday, 12 December 2017

Assignment - Original research essay

Write a paper going beyond your Wikipedia article to advance your own ideas, arguments, and original research about your topic. See course syllabus.