Wikipedia talk:Don't be quick to assume that someone is a sockpuppet
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | Text and/or other creative content from Wikipedia talk:Sockophobia was copied or moved into Wikipedia:Don't be quick to assume that someone is a sockpuppet with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
 | This page was nominated for deletion on 24 May 2009. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
"reference"
editwhat Allstarecho has added as a "reference" is no such thing - it is his personal opinion, which is opposed to the gist of this essay. That's not acceptable. If you are opposed to the POV of this essay, you are free to write an essay of your own - but you may not introduce"re that POV into this essay, masquerading as a "refernce". NoCal100 (talk) 14:11, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, it's perfectly acceptable to present an equal and balanced view to any essay. Essay's are POV themselves. - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 18:12, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
New Shortcut
editI removed WP:PARANOID redirect shortcut, per Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2009_May_24#Wikipedia:PARANOID. How about WP:NOASSUMESOCK as a suggestion. If no one objects I will add it. — Becksguy (talk) 12:42, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- That's good. Add it. MC10 | Sign here! 02:50, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Done! — Becksguy (talk) 03:19, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
This speaks truth in so many ways.
editIt is a shame the original creator of this essay has to suffer the same fate that I had to go through for almost a year. Pickbothmanlol 02:29, 21 November 2009 (UTC)