Wikipedia

Wikipedia talk:Education program archive/Boston College/Developmental Biology (Spring 2013)/Grading

< Wikipedia talk:Education program archive | Boston College/Developmental Biology (Spring 2013)
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Smallman12q in topic Notes from Online Ambassador

Notes from Online Ambassador

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  • Please login when making edits so we'll know who you are (and can keep track of your contributions).
  • Please sign comments with ~~~~
  • Please add the following to the bottom of your userpage(copy-paste):
'''Course Page'''
*[[Education Program talk:Boston College/Developmental Biology (Spring 2013)]]
{{User USEP student}}
  • When using sources, please make sure they are reliable (WP:RS). Additionally, use secondary (WP:SECONDARY) and (WP:TERTIARY) sources. This means reviews/metastudies/text books. Original studies should not be used unless there isn't another way.
  • When sourcing a journal/book, automated forms are available if your professor permits. When editing a page, on the toolbar, click 'Cite', under 'Templates' select 'cite journal'. Fill in the fields and click insert. If you provide a pmid/doi, it may autofill the citation (though you'll need to verify).
  • When choosing an article, please make sure you down the actual article name, not a redirect or disambiguation page.

Grading

edit

The project is worth 100 points total, and will be graded in parts:

  • Part 1: Proposal--10 points

As long as you post your proposal by the due date, you will receive the points. If you do not get your subject approved, you will not get credit for any of the assignment.

  • Part 2: Written Article--75 points
  • Part 3: Peer Review--15 points

Ways to Lose Points

As mentioned above, if you are late turning in any portion of the assignment, you will lose 5 points per day (including weekend and holidays) late. I will try and remind you of due dates, but turning things in on time is ultimately up to you and your partner. If you create a separate mainspace page for your topic instead of using your user subpage during the proposal period or instead of editing the stub directly after your proposal is accepted, you will lose 10 points.

Grading rubric Wikipedia Writing Assignment (Written article = 75 of 100 points)

edit

Format (15 pts):

  • Paper is on one of the assigned topics and was approved
  • Paper is at least 6 paragraphs in length of actual writing
  • Paper follows the standard Wikipedia structure for good, full length articles
  • There is no more than one grammatical/spelling error throughout the paper (everybody gets 1 mistake for free!). Note that this includes spurious capitalisation, eg. Frontal Lobe Epilepsy rather than frontal lobe epilepsy.

Content (60 pts):

______ Introduction summarizes the subject according to Wikipedia standards

______In-paper citations are present and used correctly according to Wikipedia format see Wikipedia:Citing sources

______ Bibliography includes at least 5 secondary resources, and is formatted correctly according to Wikipedia format

______ Body of the paper encompasses all reasonably researched information on the subject. Paper should conform to Wikipedia writing standards (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view) and explore chosen subject in adequate detail. (Note: “adequate detail” means I shouldn’t be able to do a quick literature search and find information not included in the paper. I want you to search current and past literature and summarize all the information you find into an easy-to-read and understand paper. If you are missing major bits of information, or have included incorrect information without citations to back up your findings, you will lose points here).

______ Body includes a section on “current” or “future” research that touches on any on-going investigations in chosen area which may not be published yet, or are in the process of being published.

______ All attempts were made to address and fix any and all comments/suggestions given by the course and Wikipedia community during peer review. If the change was not made, adequate explanation was given (which did not include "this is for an research assignment, so leave us alone)

Ways to Lose Points

______ Minus 5 points per day late

______ Creating a separate topic page outside of your user space

______ Evidence of plagiarism found (Please see BC's Academic Integrity Policy for more information)

______ More than 2 direct quotes in the paper, minus 5 points per extra quote

Extra Credit

______ If your article is chosen as a Good Article, you will receive 25 extra credit points



(Click to return to your main course page and continue.)

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Education_program_archive/Boston_College/Developmental_Biology_(Spring_2013)/Grading&oldid=1029541899"