Wikipedia talk:Education program archive/Duquesne University/Global and Cultural Perspectives (Fall 2013)/Grading
Grading
editRubrics for Wikipedia Entry
20 points possible
Approved Article (20%) 0 pt. The article was not from a peer reviewed article. 2 pt. The article was from a peer-reviewed source but dated more than six years ago. 4 pt. The article was from a peer-reviewed journal within the last 10 years
Appropriately Situated into Wikipedia (20%) 0 pt. Unaware of the topic themes and how they interrelate. 2 pt. Demonstrates knowledge of the topic but places information out of context. 4 pt. Themes are addressed in proper context.
Knowledge of Hinduism (20%) 0 pt. Failure to tie the article into the topic of Hinduism. 2 pt. Summarizes the article’s outline. 4 pt. Illustrates several unique insights into Hinduism the article communicated.
Idea Analysis (20%) 0 pt. Lacks basic understanding of the issue or assignment, little or no analysis. 2 pt. Demonstrates basic understanding of the issue or assignment, at times resorts to summarizing rather than analysis 4 pt. Original, thoughtful and perceptive, demonstrating complete command of the material
Grammar (20%) 0 pt. Numerous errors that show lack of care and impede understanding of argument, notable mechanical errors. 2 pt. Some errors, uneven use of language, occasionally errant sentence structure or inappropriate word choice. 4 pt. Free of errors; good use of language, correctly formatted Chicago/Turabian bibliographic entry, no or few mechanical errors and on time.