Wikipedia talk:Education program archive/Duquesne University/UCOR 143 Global and Cultural Perspectives (Spring 2015)/Grading
Grading
editWikipedia contributions will be graded as follows:
0 points | 2 points | 4 points | |
---|---|---|---|
20% Approved Article | The article referenced was not from a peer reviewed article. | The article was from a peer-reviewed source but dated more than six years ago. | The article was from a peer-reviewed journal within the last 6 years. |
20% Appropriately Situated into Wikipedia | Unaware of the topic themes and how they interrelate. | Demonstrates knowledge of the topic but places information out of context. | Themes are addressed in proper context. Citation is correctly formatted. |
20% Knowledge of Religion or Spirituality | Failure to tie the article into the topic of religion or spirituality. | Summarizes the article’s outline. | Illustrates several unique insights into the religion and spirituality the article communicated. |
20% Idea Analysis | Lacks basic understanding of the issue or assignment, little or no analysis. | Demonstrates basic understanding of the issue or assignment, at times resorts to summarizing rather than analysis. | Original, thoughtful and perceptive, demonstrating complete command of the material. |
20% Grammar | Numerous errors that show lack of care and impede understanding of argument, notable mechanical errors. | Some errors, uneven use of language, occasionally errant sentence structure or inappropriate word choice. | Free of errors; good use of language, none or few mechanical errors and on time. |