Wikipedia talk:Fact stuffing

Latest comment: 17 years ago by 209.79.199.107 in topic Recommended improvements
edit
  • Needs a Ying and Yang along the contrary viewpoint. Emphasis should be on the positive aspects of this article. The first improvement will be pictures added in a very specific order to convey a positive image. 71.142.210.148 15:08, 15 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
I bet the ideal editor cares (like picture). 71.143.3.205 20:12, 23 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
Can't find one. Xiner (talk, email) 21:55, 23 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
Surely someone has written an essay along the lines that Wikipedia Cares because from my short time here, that seems to be an overriding concern of the encyclopedia. How does your email thingie work? Do you check your inbox regularly or frequently? 71.143.3.205 15:16, 7 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Agree. Somebody must care at Wikipedia HQ. Harumpt 69.234.115.9 14:34, 9 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Is there a way I can watch this article? 71.142.249.58 21:06, 16 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Not with your IP address. Xiner (talk, email) 21:08, 16 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Then, do I need a fresh one? 71.142.249.58 21:19, 16 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
i do not mean to be over possessive like a bear over its young, but may i edit this article? 71.142.249.58 00:16, 17 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Be my guest, cub, whatever. Xiner (talk, email) 00:32, 17 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, sometimes I feel like a dolphin out of water. 71.142.249.58 00:24, 19 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Or like "JR" Ewing. I will consider what improvements I can make to this essay.71.142.249.58 14:27, 19 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Nice pics. Is that Snidely? 209.79.199.107 21:04, 4 April 2007 (UTC)Reply