Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/Cataract surgery/archive1
Latest comment: 5 months ago by Pbsouthwood
Welcome to FAC
editHi Pbsouthwood and welcome back to FAC. It's been a while since we saw you here, so a few pointers on the process and how to get the best from it:
What to expect
- As a first time nominator at FAC, the nominated article will need to pass a source-to-text integrity spot check and a review for over-close paraphrasing in addition to all of the usual requirements.
- You should be aware that every aspect of the article will be rigorously examined, including the standard of prose; breadth, standard and formatting of sources; image licencing; and adherence to the Manual of Style.
Dealing with reviewers
- Try to deal with comments in a timely and constructive fashion.
- Remember that reviewers are constructively giving their opinion on the article.
- Keep calm when dealing with criticism of any aspect of the article.
- Don't take the criticism personally: reviewers are examining the article – not you!
How to get the best from the process
- Reviewing the work of others is a good way to get a grasp of the process from the other side.
- Reviewing other FACs also increases the likelihood that others will review your nomination – although remember there is no quid pro quo at FAC.
Good luck with your nomination. Gog the Mild (talk) 13:52, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your welcome, Gog the Mild, I remember the process well, although it has been years. I will be well satisfied if Cataract surgery is improved during the process as much as Underwater diving was. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 15:27, 1 March 2024 (UTC)