Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy/archive3

Resolved Comments from Squeamish Ossifrage

• This may be the result of template oddities, but the language of sources is indicated in two different ways (cf. Note 2 and Note 5). Ideally, this would be consistent, one way or the other.

 Done

• Note 11: "Diversityand"

 Done

• Note 25: This isn't formatted at all.

 Done

• Note 36: This is such a dead link, it has the template twice!

 Done

• Note 43: Incorrectly formatted. "BBC" is not part of the article title.

 Done

• Note 44: Does not match other reference formats (comma before date instead of period).

 Done

• Note 50: One of the dates does not match the date format in use elsewhere.

 Done

• Note 80: You have a location for this periodical/web publisher, but you don't generally provide them (and they're not required).

 Done

• And fixed an author formatting error I'd neglected to mention, too! Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 00:48, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

• Note 81: This is a journal publication, with volume and issue numbers that need to be cited.

 Done

• Note 83: There's no need for publication timestamps.

 Done

• Note 84: Not sure what's going on with the bullet-pointed dead link; there's a live link to the article. There's no compelling need to document where it used to be.

 Done

• Note 86: Why is this a reliable source?

 Done (removed)

• Note 87: This is not literally by an author named "National Post". Rather, it was originally written by the National Post and republished at canada.com by Postmedia News.

 Done

• Note 90: Your link is dead, but this is a print source, so that's tolerable. The WorldCat listing doesn't mention Rytkonen, just Hvidt and Mourtizen, so I'm not sure what's going on with the authorship. In any case, you should include that this source has OCLC 473198795.

 Done

• Note 92: I'd be very surprised if this wasn't archived somewhere.

removed - link to secondary source added.

• Note 102: This should be a footnote or something, but not an actual reference to other Wikipedia pages.

 Done

• Note 104: In other sources where the language is indicated this way, it appears at the end, not in the middle. Also, you usually capitalize "Retrieved" but do not here (nor in 105); also, retrieval date is elsewhere offset by a period, but here with a comma.

 Done

• Note 108: This press release is cited as little more than a bare link. Consider Template:Cite press release, perhaps?

 Done

• Note 110: Ritzau is the agency, not the author. Language needs to be indicated.

 Done

• Note 115: "Commerci al"

 Done

• Note 124: Author not correctly formatted, among other issues already noted.

 Done

• Note 128/129: Page numbers are not part of the title. Also, these are dead links.

 Done

• Note 141: This should also probably be a footnote, rather than a reference.

 Done

• Note 145: This a journal, with an issue and page numbers for this article, and should be cited as such.

 Done

• Note 150: This isn't really an adequate reference format.

 Done