Wikipedia talk:Fourth opinion

Latest comment: 4 years ago by TransporterMan in topic Proposal failed

Text copied from 3O

edit

I admit and declare that most of the text on this page was copied from WP:3O. However, I don’t see a reason that this is wrong, because the only difference between 4O and 3O is the number of original disputants, so the content on the project pages should be the same to avoid confusion. Therefore, I am reusing and adapting the content under CC BY-SA 3.0, giving full credit to Wikipedia and any editors of the 3O page, and lastly invoking WP:IAR. Also see WP:CWW. MrSwagger21 (talk) 22:29, 20 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Discussion at Village Pump

edit

A discussion about the addition of Fourth Opinion as a means of dispute resolution is ongoing. See Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Proposal to add 'Fourth opinion' as a means of dispute resolution. MrSwagger21 (talk) 23:28, 20 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Appropriate use of draft namespace?

edit

See this enquiry. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 21:45, 21 June 2020 (UTC) No longer relevant. — TransporterMan (TALK) 16:36, 23 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposal failed

edit

This proposal, having gained no traction or consensus, has been marked as failed. Please do not list disputes as they will not be answered. See Dispute Resolution for other dispute resolution options.TransporterMan (TALK) 17:06, 30 August 2020 (UTC)Reply