Wikipedia talk:Historical archive/Policy/What's in, what's out

Please see previous discussion at the /Archive 1.

Status

The commentary currently on the page is becoming less and less useful as more notability guidelines are developed. Some sections should probably just be replaced with links. Ardric47 23:42, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Done. --unforgettableid | talk to me 01:20, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

For historical reasons, though, perhaps the entire page could be archived as it is now? Ardric47 23:42, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Why not just make it not policy? I have been bold and done so; feel free to revert and explain why you disagree. --unforgettableid | talk to me 01:20, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:What's in, what's out

Shall we revive Wikipedia:What's in, what's out? It will never become policy, but it is a useful reference as to whether certain things, like, say, most radio stations should normally be AfDed or not. Cheers, --unforgettableid | talk to me 19:27, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

"It will never become policy" = "{{historical}}" --Francis Schonken 07:10, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

WIWO is back!

It's offical! WIWO is back! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.66.35.10 (talk) 19:56, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

No, it isn't. This is not how we elevate things to policy, and as it seems clear that you are aware of this I have simply rolled back your changes. Hans Adler 20:18, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Deletion

Can we please reach a consensus because I don't understand why it's kept for historical purposes — Preceding unsigned comment added by Typo385.5 (talk • contribs) 08:59, 14 December 2013 (UTC)