Wikipedia talk:List of Wikipedians by number of DYKs
This is the talk page for Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by number of DYKs. Comments should be made at Wikipedia talk:Did you know, the main talk page for this group, or at Help talk:Template for technical questions. Because of this page's obscure location, comments made here are unlikely to get a quick response.
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of Wikipedians by number of DYKs page. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
25 DYKs!
edit- Hello there! Per this I have 26 DYK credits. Can someone add my name in the list? Thanks. -- Frankie talk 18:45, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Oh! oh! Me too! — LlywelynII 11:24, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- You do it yourself ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:30, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Is it still the protocol to self add and also to move oneself in the list as needed? I am in there but my number is wrong. See User:Lar/DYK. ++Lar: t/c 15:34, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Lar: yes that is the usual. I don't know of many (any?) people updating others than themselves. Chris857 (talk) 15:40, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks. Done. ++Lar: t/c 17:31, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Red link in source of data
editUser:Blnguyen (206) changed his name to User:YellowMonkey before retiring in 2010 in the aftermath of Wikipedia:Requests for comment/YellowMonkey which is perfectly OK, but shouldn't we follow a general rule of thumb that DYK confirmation links remain working if the update is to be upheld? YellowMonkey also deleted his page User:Blnguyen/DYK. Thanks, Poeticbent talk 14:20, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- I have been cleaning up the list, and awarding long overdue awards. @Gerda Arendt and Moonraker:, do you hve any comments? --evrik (talk) 16:09, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Good thinking, evrik. I remember Yellow Monkey all too well. Let’s just say De mortuis nil nisi bonum. I take your point about the confirmation links and I see no harm in taking names out of the list once those are gone. For anyone interested in the archaeology of these things, all is preserved in the deep history of the page. Moonraker (talk) 13:02, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Adding myself
editI have 28 DYKs. The majority of them I created/got to GA and then nominated myself, but one or two were created by somebody else and I was a co-nom for doing work on the article. I understand that most users just list themselves here, but I want to get it straight first. Do I list myself in creations/expansions with all 28, or in noms with the number I nominated myself? My documentation is at User:White Arabian Filly/My DYKs. White Arabian Filly Neigh 21:38, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
- While there may be some checking, much of it is on the honor system. @White Arabian Filly:, does that answer your question? --evrik (talk) 16:09, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Adding myself
editHey, I found out that I qualify! User:Adityavagarwal/DYK Here, it could be seen that I have 25 DYK articles. One might only see 24 because the Philippine cuckoo-dove and ruddy cuckoo-dove were together, although due to some bot error at the time, the credit was only given for the Philippine cuckoo-dove and not the ruddy cuckoo-dove. Adityavagarwal (talk) 06:18, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- I qualify too. Should I add me myself?-Nizil (talk) 05:26, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Adityavagarwal and Nizil Shah:. Add yourselves. --evrik (talk) 16:09, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- How come I'm not on this list? Per my userpage, I've got 131.--Launchballer 19:03, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Launchballer: Add yourself. This list is self-nominated. --evrik (talk) 19:11, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
25 and 50 DYK awards
editI just realized I haven’t gotten medals for reaching 25 and 50 DYK. Can someone award me them or can I pin them to my chest myself? Thank you, Thriley (talk) 01:30, 21 May 2022 (UTC)