Wikipedia talk:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia/Curtis James
Latest comment: 14 years ago by 24.211.249.203 in topic Untitled
This is an archive of the discussion of Curtis James, a hoax article that was deleted. It has been copied here solely for the purpose of documenting hoaxes on Wikipedia, in order to improve our detection and understanding of them. If you would like to actually make a comment on this page or the discussion you see below, please go to Wikipedia talk:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Untitled
This article needs a lot of work. Given its quality, I am surprised that it is rated a "B". Racepacket (talk) 21:16, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
I agree, what we could do is combine his stats from 2001-2003 into one section and then his 2004 2006 2008 stats into one aswell, this would shorten the article also and keep more emphasis on his recent running. Im surprised it was rated this way without work. Wilson172 (talk) 12:30, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Guys, this is all made up.... anyway a 10.68 guy is non-notable anyway —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.211.249.203 (talk) 06:46, 10 November 2010 (UTC) It was rated B class by the IP who pulled the hoax. Racepacket (talk) 02:39, 14 November 2010 (UTC)