Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2009-08-03/Little Richard

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Smoovedogg

Agenda for Mediation

edit

These texts are for the mediator only. Mediation case for Little Richard:

[0%] Getting started.
[5%] Garner party agreement to ground rules.
[10%] Establish party stances in dispute; ascertain what each party wishes to get out of the mediation.
[20%] Discuss the problem, and if necessary obtain help from relevant wikiprojects, or noticeboards.
[40%] Develop and propose compromises as possible solutions to the dispute.
[50%] Establish which possible solutions show promise.
[80%] Refine and tailor solutions.
[85%] Evaluate proposed solutions to determine whether they comply with policy.
[90%] Garner party support for a proposed solution.
[95%] Implement solution.
[100%] Close mediation if parties consider this dispute is now resolved.

Ground rules

edit
  • Please keep all comments focused on facts. Proper editing decorum must be maintained, and as such, incivility and personal attacks must not occur.
  • All participants are asked to refrain from any editing of any of the disputed articles, including for vandalism patrolling. I've watchlisted all the articles, so can pick up vandalism, and if there are proposals to change content while the case is running, I will make them if I feel there is consensus to do so.
  • MedCab is not a formal part of the dispute resolution process, and cannot provide binding sanctions. Nevertheless, I ask that everyone involved agree to abide by the outcome of this case, or move to the next stage of dispute resoltion if you feel unable to do so.
  • Finally, your signature below also indicates your acceptance of MacMed and PhilKnight as your informal mediators.

Please sign just your username below, with four tildes (~~~~) to indicate your agreement with the ground rules and your participation in the case.

Agreement by participants to abide by ground rules
edit

2help (message me) 15:42, 15 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Seduisant (talk) 00:36, 17 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sssoul (talk) 08:30, 17 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Smoovedogg (talk) 21:22, 22 August 2009 (UTC)Reply