Wikipedia talk:Peer review/Mulholland Drive (film)/archive1

/archive1

Shouldn't the peer view not have the /archive1 extension until after the peer review gets old? —Erik (talk • contrib) - 18:12, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

It's the way it came up. The Peer Review system has changed since the last time I was here. The instructions did not say to remove the /archive. I don't know. --Moni3 (talk) 18:15, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

I'll have to ask -- WP:FILMR shows similar /archive1 extensions, yet a peer review like this doesn't. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 18:22, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Looking at WP:PR, I assume that it's a systemic change. I think this peer review is in the right place, so ones like Dirty Dancing need to be fixed. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 18:24, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

The peer review process changed a couple of months ago to avoid the page moves which create broken links. Peer reviews are now begun on the next free archive page, so they never need to be moved, and all links to them are permanent. Moving old peer reviews which are in the wrong place needs to be done with care: I've done many myself, and I admire those who are willing to fix them; it can be hard work to sort out the messed up links! Geometry guy 22:16, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Collapse section?

Would it be better to make the section with Belovedfreak's comments collapsible? It seems that they have been addressed, and we could focus on the ongoing issues. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 20:54, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Yes, that would be fine. I don't know how to do it, but after you or someone does, I'm going to take note so I don't have to write that again...--Moni3 (talk) 22:01, 15 April 2008 (UTC)