Wikipedia talk:Peer review/Space opera in Scientology scripture/archive1

Good Article

I just took a read through the entire article. It sounds great to me. Everything is well cited and it reads clearly. I don't see any POV either intended or unintend. When I get home tonight I'll copy edit the article and also check the references more thourougly, make sure there aren't any broken links or anything that is considered less then reliable. I'll also take a look and see if I think anything maybe needs to be condensed or or combined or if any re-sectioning is necessary IMO. I think it might be hard to condense anything more though since there is a lot out there on this subject. Cheers! Elhector 19:21, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

• Thanks, just curious, any reason you posted this on the talk page of the Peer Review? Curt Wilhelm VonSavage 19:24, 23 October 2007 (UTC).

In all honesty, I didn't know any better. I'm still a little new to wikipedia so I thought that's where it should go. I don't think I've ever participated in a peer review. Let me know where my comment should go and I'll move it there :-) Elhector 20:00, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

That's perfectly fine. I added it to the Peer Review. You cannot add subsections within a Peer Review, so I added the heading you used as bolded instead. Let me know if this is okay with you. Curt Wilhelm VonSavage 20:04, 23 October 2007 (UTC).

That was fine. I went ahead and fixed the signature on the comment, the auto sign bot came in and put your sig at the end of the comment, I thought that might be confusing to some people :-) Elhector 20:11, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. Curt Wilhelm VonSavage 20:19, 23 October 2007 (UTC).