Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Boris Stomakhin/Pre-Discussion

Moved from #Issues to be mediated section

Biophys removed sourced material from the article claiming that they are poorly sourced, contradict to BLP policy, that they are defamatory, controversial and etc. The underlying problem for edit warring is that Biophys holds strongly Russophobic views and maintains that criminal Boris Stomakhin, who got 5 years of prison in Russia for public calls to extremism and terrorism against Russians including me, is actually innocent dissident and there is a conspiracy against him by Russian government. Biophys took his text material inserted into the article Boris Stomakhin from blog La Russophobe. As you could see phrases in the current article Boris Stomakhin match those in Blog La Russophobe. It is evident that this Blog La Russophobe is inciting ethnic hatred at least. The page of that blog http://russophobe.blogspot.com/2006/06/why-is-lr-russophobe-why-arent-you.html says that you should hate Russians. User:Biophys insists that we should agree on exclusion from the article of citations taken from Russian respectable newspapers which evidence that Stomakhin is not really innocent peaceful dissident. Following the edit warring between me and User:Biophys, Boris Stomakhin article was protected by administrator User:Cbrown1023 who told that he would unprotect that page till I reach an agreement with User:Biophys. User:Biophys refuses to negotiate and to make any changes. Instead he forces removal of all sources which present another POV. The example of this is the following:

Sorry, but I insist to exclude this paragraph for the reasons
explained above. This is my last word. There is nothing to 
discuss here. Biophys 23:08, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Also Biophys openly hinted on me as an agent of KGB working in the internet. called me a troll on my talk page and therefore personaly attacked me. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Boris_Stomakhin#Further_actions. However the main reason is that my edits are properly sourced and present fairly another POV which Biophys deleted from the article completly.

1. I would like to reintroduce in the article deleted opinion of journalists and reporters from respectable Russian newspapers which present another point of view on Stomakhin and his activities.
2. I would like to reintroduce deleted citations taken from the Stomakhin articles published on the web, since they are not contradictory and present his (Stomakhin's) personal POV.
3. I would like to reintroduce in the article deleted full citations of charges from the court official sentence of which Stomakhin was found guilty without summarizing, because Biophys covers his real charges o extremism with the word hate speech, which distorts the real legal picture.
4. I would like to reintroduce in the article deleted citations from Stomakhin defenders Novodvorskaya and Gannushkina in which they say that Stomakhin views were not dissident, outrageous. And a citation of Novodorskaya refusing to defend Stomakhin.
5. I would like to reintroduce in the article deleted facts about disinformation which was contained in statement of Jewish Councils about Stomakhin case.
6. I would like to reintroduce the following citations of Stomakhin taken from reliable sources:

The Stomakhin's article contained the following passages written by Stomakhin: Kill, Kill, Kill! To flood all Russia with blood, to not give a quarter to anyone, to try to make at least one atomic explosion on the territory of Russian Federation -- this is like the program of radical Resistance should be, and Russian's, and Chechen's, and anyone's! Let the Russians, according to their deserts, reap as they has sownMaxim Sokolov Trap-282 Izvestia 23 November 2006, Boris Stomakhin article Death to Russia. Russians should be killed, and only killed, for there is no one among them who is normal, intelligent, or who can be talked with and for understanding of whom we could rely. Harsh collective responsibility of all Russians should be introduced, of all loyal Russian citizens for the actions of the government elected by them -- for the genocide, executions, ordeals, trade with corpses... From that moment there should be no division of killers on combatant and non-combatant, wilful or forcedBoris Stomakhin article Death to Russia.

1. I want also to restore original court sentence citations of Stomakhin without Biophys comments:

• "Bombing in Moscow subway was justified, natural and legal... The Chechens have full moral right to blow up anything they want in Russia after all that Russia and Russians did to them, none objections on humanism and philanthropy could be accepted."
• "We, 'Revolutionary Contact Association' and 'Radical Politics' are united with the Committee and are ready to cooperate with it. It is understood that we are lot more radical than it. We are for not waiting until 2008 and we shouldn't bother ourselves particularly with Constitution, but we are for calling people to overthrow and liquidate Putin's regime as soon as possible. And we at all do not see possibility of preserving of present Russian Federation as a single state. But we are for common front with all our allies, even more moderate".
• "Let tens of new Chechen snipers take their positions in the mountain ridges and the city ruins and let hundreds, thousands of aggressors fall under righteous bullets! No mercy! Death to the Russian occupiers!"
• "After all, with the same Budanov's - maniacs, blood lusting sadists, murderers and degenerates with epaulets - all Chechnya is currently filled up. And it is Russian occupation army consists of these same Budanov's".
• "In Chechnya Russian army ceased to exist as a military structure of a state, finally turned into devilish gang of marauders and killers, intoxicated with narcotics gang".

1. I would like to restore opinions of journalists from respectable newspapers:

Some journalists like M. Smolin from Komsomolskaya Pravda described his views as extremely russophobic, and suggested that Stomakhin is mentally ill. . Prominent Izvestia journalist Maksim Sokolov, described Stomakhin political views as worse than those published in Mein Kampf. Orthodox religion, according to Stomakhin opinion, should be liquidated and he called not to recognize such religion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vlad fedorov (talk • contribs)