Wikipedia talk:Successful adminship candidacies/Archive 4
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Majorly in topic Inconsistency
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Wikipedia:Successful adminship candidacies. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Inconsistency
Why is it that the RfAs at Unsuccessful requests for adminship are listed alphabetically, but here they are listed chronologically? If I want to read someones RfA but have no idea when they got the mop, how am I supposed to find it? Unschool 05:37, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
- On the User:Majorly/RfA/Stats/all chart you can click the button on Username to get an alphabetical listing. Kingturtle (talk) 10:17, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you; that's very interesting to look at. I see that it does not go back to the Big Bang, but I understand that a lot of that old stuff is permenently lost. Unschool 06:39, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- It goes back to Jan 2004 I think, with RFA being created in June 2003. None of it's lost as such, it's merely undocumented. When I feel like it, I'll go through the page history and subpage all the rest of the RFAs and add them to the data. Majorly talk 14:29, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you; that's very interesting to look at. I see that it does not go back to the Big Bang, but I understand that a lot of that old stuff is permenently lost. Unschool 06:39, 15 January 2009 (UTC)