Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/November 8, 2006
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Makemi in topic Madrigal
If a cropped image must be used on the main page, could it at least be a bit bigger? At this size it means absolutely nothing even to people who can read music. I'm sure there are constraints I don't know about, but it'd be nice if it could be somewhat bigger. If there's somewhere else I should request this and you run across this comment, let me know where I should ask. Thanks, Mak (talk) 20:50, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Main page FA images can't be overly large - 100px wide is the usual (For pictures that are very wide and not very tall, I've gone as high as 130px wide). I agree that at that size, the image of the sheet music isn't particularly meaningful, but it's the best (read: most relavant) image in the article. I personally would prefer think it would make much more sense to have a painting (or picture) of the women singing, but there isn't one in the article. Raul654 21:09, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Ok, fair enough, just thought I'd ask. I looked and looked for an image of the women, but haven't been able to find any for a number of reasons. Mak (talk) 21:17, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Madrigal
editShouldn't Madrigal direct to Madrigal (music) instead?--Forlornandshorn 15:25, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- Fixed. I thought I had checked all those links before, but I guess not. Mak (talk) 15:37, 8 November 2006 (UTC)