Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Visual arts
Related discussions: |
This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
To-do list for Wikipedia:WikiProject Visual arts:
|
This WikiProject was featured on the WikiProject report at the Signpost on 4 June 2012. |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Different artworks? Different pages?..
editHello editors,
I have a question about Follow my dreams page. It is about a hand-painted mural by the italian artist TVBoy in 2022 in the city of Barcelona. This mural was originally called "Super Alexia" where you could read in the background the phrase: "Follow your dreams" with the footballer Alexia Putellas stepped out painted in a Superwoman outfit with a cape clearly visible on her back. In 2023, due to the multitude of vandalism acts, the artist decided to redo the mural, but neither the phrase nor the drawing of the player were the same. You can see the clear differences with the 2022 painting: [1] and the 2023 updated painting: [2]
In the Talk:Follow my dreams I proposed to make different articles because the new painting of 2023 should be treated as a completely different one even if it is located in the same place and on top of the old painting. The painting and the message in the background is totally different as you can read in the article: [3]
Throughout history, many painters have painted over other paintings and they have never been treated as updates of these but yes as a different works. It is currently an active dispute with user Kingsif that recently moved the page (Super Alexia to Follow my dreams) and reverses the edits I made because he wants to fix the date of the old 2022 painting but the name "Follow my dreams" was created in the year 2023 not in 2022.
What do you think?
Request for Review of Sandbox Draft - Machiko Edmondson Article
editHi WikiProject Visual Arts Members,
I hope this message finds you well.
I have been working on a Wikipedia article draft about the artist Machiko Edmondson and have placed it in my sandbox for initial review. I would greatly appreciate it if members of WikiProject Visual Arts could take a look and provide feedback on the content, formatting, and compliance with Wikipedia’s guidelines.
Sandbox Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Xenopoiesis/sandbox
Summary:
Subject: Machiko Edmondson, an artist with extensive exhibitions in the UK and internationally.
Areas for Feedback:
Compliance with notability and verifiability standards. Formatting and structure improvements. Clarity and neutrality of the content. Thank you in advance for your time and assistance! Xenopoiesis (talk) 22:53, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Portrait of a Man (Self Portrait?)
editThere is a requested move discussion at Talk:Portrait of a Man (Self Portrait?)#Requested move 23 September 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. — BarrelProof (talk) 15:30, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Burney Relief
editBurney Relief has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:48, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Discussion of relationship between The arts, Art and Visual arts
editThere is a discussion on the relationship between The arts, Art and Visual arts at Talk:Art#Art vs The arts vs Visual arts merges that may interest members of this WikiProject. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 13:27, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
The page for "Artist" is in a depressing state. When compared to pages for "Scientist" and "Engineer" it is obviously below the quality we should expect. Even compared to more specific occupations, such as "Plumber", "Aircraft pilot," and "Graphic designer," the page for Artist looks embarrassingly thin and poorly sourced. For example, Artist has an entire section on "Dictionary definitions" that seems to copy paste dictionary definitions from the Oxford English Dictionary without actually citing the dictionary, or quoting its definitions.
I understand that some high level articles don't get much attention as people are more interested in their niche interests, but this is among the worst pages I've seen on Wikipedia for topics that are taught at the elementary school level. The park by my university has a more comprehensive page. It is beyond my expertise to bring this page up to the level I'd expect for such an important topic, so I'm posting it here in the hopes it attracts the attention of an expert in Theory of art, or Art history. Thank you for your help and time. GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 18:58, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Brachiosaurus Replica
editThere's an ongoing discussion about the creation of Brachiosaurus Replica at Talk:Brachiosaurus Replica, if any project members are interested. Happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:22, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for The Nightmare
editThe Nightmare has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:49, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Featured list candidate
editList of artwork at the United States Capitol complex has been nominated as a featured list candidate; the nomination can be found here. Since the list falls under this WikiProject's scope, I am posting this notice here. It currently needs more comments, so if you've got time, please comment on the nomination page. Thanks in advance! SirMemeGod 13:47, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Arts Club of Chicago
editArts Club of Chicago has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster (trout me!) 01:11, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Recent political art in the U.S.
editSome links to newly created articles about recent political art in the U.S., if anyone's interested in helping out:
Help improving my first article, on artist Amikam Toren
editHello, I’m an aspiring Wikipedia content creator and complete beginner. This is my first article and I would welcome all criticism and advice on how I can improve. I still have some citations to source for this – these are marked by * in the text.
What am I getting wrong about the ISBN’s cited here?
My interests are Contemporary Art, Physics, Philosophy and Literature. 2025Newbie (talk) 19:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- The issue with the ISBNs was that you put "ISBN" in the data field after the "isbn=". You don't need to do that, the Wikimedia markup software inserts that automatically for you when it renders the page.
|isbn=978-1-9993285-2-8
is correct.|isbn=ISBN 978-1-9993285-2-8
is incorrect.- Hope that helps in the future. (I've already fixed it in your draft.)
- GranCavallo (talk) 20:35, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oh thank you so much! That is really helpful. 2025Newbie (talk) 20:45, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
edit
Hello, |