Wikipedia talk:Why Heavy Bombers Are Not Useful Anymore
Latest comment: 3 days ago by Sangdeboeuf in topic "Wikipedia:HEAVY" listed at Redirects for discussion
This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
This article
editThe publication of uninformative, one sided drivel such as this is why I can't find it in myself to financially support wikipedia 2601:700:8004:7290:91DB:31C3:BA60:4423 (talk) 21:08, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Heavy bombers are indeed mostly useless. The closest thing to one the US has simply serves as a flying missile station.
- And yes, wikipedia articles will have to get shorter sometimes. Not everything is done best by one huge article. ☢️Plutonical☢️ᶜᵒᵐᵐᵘⁿᶦᶜᵃᵗᶦᵒⁿˢ 11:10, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
"Wikipedia:HEAVY" listed at Redirects for discussion
editThe redirect Wikipedia:HEAVY has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 21 § Wikipedia:HEAVY until a consensus is reached. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 21:08, 21 November 2024 (UTC)