This page is supported by the Department of Fun, which aims to provide Wikipedians with fun so that they stay on Wikipedia and keep on improving articles. If you have any ideas, do not hesitate to post them to the discussion page or access our home page to join the Department of Fun.Department of FunWikipedia:Department of FunTemplate:WikiProject Department of FunDepartment of Fun articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Primates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Primates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PrimatesWikipedia:WikiProject PrimatesTemplate:WikiProject PrimatesPrimate articles
Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I will neither confirm nor deny rumors I may have been dragged kicking and screaming into the woke world. As I encounter this nostalgic reminder of the days of my youth, however, I wonder if the WikiKing intentionally demonizes masculinity, or if the goals of gender neutrality might be better served by renaming this species of Wikifauna the WikiMonarch? Thewellman (talk) 16:09, 15 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Neutral WikiKing has a better ring to it. (No rhyme intended.) And since most who edit Wikipedia are biological men (90%), I suppose it is fair to call it a king. However I don't want to be a person standing unnecessarily in the way of progress. So if the ladies here want to change the title of WikiKing to WikiMonarch then by all means go ahead!Spannerjam (talk) 10:14, 23 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Updated I belive those who have lived the full female experience should decide on matters like this. An issue like this may seem banal to some but every little bit helps in the way towards making females more welcome to Wikipedia, which is an outspoken community goal. Spannerjam (talk) 10:03, 17 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
