Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Dentistry
 | To help centralise discussions and keep related topics together, all newly-created project talk pages are redirected to this page. |
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Dentistry and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
AAP Classification for 2017
editI would like to update the information on the Periodontology article under the Periodontal diseases section with the 2017 Disease Classification. Toothscraper (talk) 00:04, 1 March 2023 (UTC
Unsourced Dental surgery
editHello -- Dental surgery has been completely unsourced since November 2007 and is now among the oldest unsourced articles. If someone could add at least one or two academic sources that would be very helpful. Embarrassingly I've tried but failed to find an online non-commercial source that supports the use of the term as described. Thanks, Espresso Addict (talk) 10:47, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Second permanent teeth
editIs there any article about second permanent teeth/article related to dental research or future of dentistry? Eurohunter (talk) 22:06, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Human tooth
editHuman tooth has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:59, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Self-citing in dentistry related articles
editWould someone from this WikiProject mind taking a look at some of the recent contributions of Rmarshalldmd. They appear to be adding citations to their own website (like this) to various dentristry related articles that seem problematic per both WP:CITESELF and WP:MEDCOI. Perhaps they're a dentist because of their of username and the COI declaration on their user page, and may actually be a type of "subject expert"; the links themselves, howebver, seem rather WP:SPAMMY and not really in accordance with WP:MEDRS. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC)