Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Georgia (country)/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

This page is an Archive of the discussions from WikiProject Georgia (country) talk page (Discussion page). (January 2007 - December 2007) - Please Do not edit!

Georgia (country) discussion from Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals

Description

for the nation of Georgia, the only Transcaucasus nation not to have its own project

Interested Wikipedians (please add your name)

1. Chris 08:36, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
2. Josephseagullstalin 03:08, 23 March 2007 (UTC) YEAH!!! GEORGIA IS AN AWESOME NATION!!!!! IT HAS A RICH HISTORY AS A POST SOVIET STATE!!!!!
3. (although I'm not sure I'll be much use where creation of content is concerned) BigHaz - Schreit mich an 03:50, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
4. --Üñţïf̣ļëŗ (see also:ә? Ә!) 16:31, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
5. Euskera 19:50, 23 March 2007 (UTC) I can also help out with History and culture info. Thanks.
6. Aivazovsky 22:42, 23 March 2007 (UTC), I'm very interested in Georgian history.
7. Geagea 14:06, 24 March 2007 (UTC) very interested in georgian relatied articles, and trying my best to put them mostly in the hebrew wiki.
8. Kober^Talk 06:46, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Now that Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state) is running, how about one for the country Georgia? Chris 22:16, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

• Before I create it, how would you like it named? Chris 16:16, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Issue with the main template

The main "this article is part of WikiProject Georgia" template seems to keep articles in the unassessed and unknown-importance categories even after they're assessed. I'd mark the ones I've found manually, but then they'd be in two categories by assessment which would start to get a bit messy. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 10:51, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

I suspect that it's the same with the importance, in that the template will keep them marked as "unknown-importance" even if someone assigns an importance value. By the by, I've nicked the Greek project's assessment scale and set it up as ours (why Greece? Tamta was an article I tagged). It may well not be the best way of setting things up, but at least it's going to give people a vague conception of standards until something else comes along. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 11:06, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

wikibreak

Due to circumstances in my life, I need to reduce my activity in Wikipedia, and will be taking a leave of absence. I wish the Project the best of success while I am away. Chris 22:00, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Gia Getsadze

The article on Gia Getsadze, a Georgian lawyer, is presently under discussion at AfDDGG 00:34, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Standardisation?

Hi. I've just joined this project (assuming it's still active) since I'm planning to work on a few articles about Georgian history. I'm currently preparing an article on Georgia under the Russian Empire in my sandbox, which should take care of Russian Georgia mentioned on the front page here.

One thing I've noticed when reading articles on Georgian history is that there doesn't seem to be a standard way of naming Georgian kings here, e.g. the same person is variously Erekle, Irakli and Heraclius. A project like this would be the ideal way to introduce more uniformity in such matters, which would help both readers and editors alike. Any thoughts on the matter? Cheers. --Folantin 11:54, 27 September 2007 (UTC)